9% > 0%
That's reason enough to get it.
In other words, there's a 91% chance it won't protect against a damn thing.
Sounds like a ponzi scheme to me... how much are these things per dose?
Looking like a bad flu season
![]()
Oh noes, according to this chart we've had a flu EPIDEMIC every fucking year! 🙄
Yes it would if you can't read the fucking chart.
The elderly have a bad immune system and giving them like 45 different strains of inactivated flu vaccine over the course of 15 years probably didn't do it much good.
Yes it would if you can't read the fucking chart.
Bottom curve is the seasonal baseline, top curve is the minimum to be considered an "epidemic", the red squiggly line is actual mortality percentages. It's not fucking rocket science.
Are you saying it would hurt? How?
If you think a one or two week spike slightly above the epidemic threshold (as they occurred in 2009 and 2012) counts as a seasonal epidemic then, as I said, you can't read the chart and have no idea what you're talking about.

250-300m per year x $20-30.... not a bad haul.
Wear out the immune systems ability to have enough memory B cells, if as an elderly person you don't have many WBC's to begin with.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_B_cell
That would be my theory why it had such a poor success rate with the elderly vs other demographics.
By now they've had 45? ~ish strains of flu vaccine?
If you started getting them when you were 55 and you are now 70 thats 15 years of flu vaccine, its a trivalent vaccine so 3 strains per year. Yuck. No one knows what that does to your immune system. Going by the 9% effectiveness rate, nothing good.
I'm sure more people got the flu from getting the shot than it prevented from getting the flu.
Really? You're going go with that statement?
And you are going to say no one in history has ever got the flu from the vaccine, right?
And you are going to say no one in history has ever got the flu from the vaccine, right?