Originally posted by: tcsenter
Sure! Me and the other five, six, seven, eight, people who have been discussing the Jetway card will go straight over there so as to not hurt your little feewings because nobody is discussing the card you want to discuss.
Grow up, baby.
Originally posted by: tcsenter
550MHz, same difference.Originally posted by: Jawadali
http://www.samsung.com/Product...tc36+&x=13&y=7
I'm guessing the tc36 means 3.6 nanoseconds, which means its rated for 555mhz.
I suspect these chips are speed binned rejects that would not run over 225MHz (450MHz DDR) because I'll be damned if I can get passed 225MHz without artifacts in UT2003 and 3DMark 2001SE. Even tried aiming a fan onto the video card - can't get passed 225MHz. The card is rock solid, though, up to 225MHz.
I thought it was overkill to put 550MHz DRAM on a card with a default clock of 400MHz. Now it makes perfect sense....
The GeCube 9550XT is essentially a Radeon 9600 PRO. This much has never been in dispute.do we also agree that the gecube 9550XT is faster @ stock than the jetway? or are you still being delusional?
The GeCube 9550XT is essentially a Radeon 9600 PRO. This much has never been in dispute
From Newegg:
Chipset/Core Speed: ATI RADEON 9550/250MHz
Memory/Effective Speed: 128MB DDR/400MHz
Its still listed as 250/400 for nearly a month now. If it weren't 250/400, surely Newegg would have changed the specs after a week, two at the most, but a month? Not likely.
That's great. If only that were the card offered in the Newegg catalog....but it isn't.
The Digit-Life Review is of the GeCube "Radeon 9550 128MB Platinum Edition". Digit-Life lists the different 9550 models being offered by Info-Tek:
Newegg's catalog:
Model# GC-R9550GU-C3
Item # N82E16814240021
Specifications:
Chipset/Core Speed: ATI RADEON 9550/250MHz
Memory/Effective Speed: 128MB DDR/400MHz
Not the same card. Thanks for playing.
Newegg's mistake....for a month now.
lol! Genius. The dispute has been whether the card in the Newegg catalog is a GeCube 9550XT, not whether the GeCube 9550XT is faster than a standard Radeon 9600 NP. Do you have any control over how abjectly stupid you make yourself look?this has never been in dispute?
isnt saying the card is only 250MHZ the same as saying its not a 9600pro? unless you can show me a 250mhz r9600pro you just inserted foot in mouth.
This is the statement to which you're referring:and as for not reading....didnt you post back on page 2 how the 9550 is slower than the jetway poop card your pushing even tho you overlook the fact that evreyone keeps telling you this card isnt 250MHZ its actually 400mhz hmmm
Never - ever - have I stated nor even implied the Jetway was faster than a Radeon 9550XT. By your own words, you clearly understood that the dispute was whether the card being sold by Newegg was in fact the higher clocked 9550XT.It should be noted the review is of the 9550 "XT" with much higher clocks than the card sold at Newegg. A better review comparison would be the Sapphire Radeon 9550 128MB DDR (250/400) 128-bit 8X AGP.
It should be noted the review is of the 9550 "XT" with much higher clocks than the card sold at Newegg. A better review comparison would be the Sapphire Radeon 9550 128MB DDR (250/400) 128-bit 8X AGP.
the dispute was whether the card being sold by Newegg was in fact the higher clocked 9550XT.
Are you high? Do you even realize how utterly stupid you habitually make yourself look? Here are you own words:I never claimed that you said the jetway was faster. so what youre defending i dont know.
By logical inference, you have accused me of having the delusion that the GeCube 9550XT is not faster than the Jetway. I stated this clearly was never the dispute, a statement which you then questioned (disputing the dispute). More of your own words:"do we also agree that the gecube 9550XT is faster @ stock than the jetway? or are you still being delusional?"
Next, you continue to prove to the world your total incompetence at following a discussion:"this has never been in dispute?"
In the same breath, you start to agree that the dispute is not about the performance of the 9550XT then immediately attempt to turn it back into a dispute about the performance of the 9550XT. More of your own words:"isnt saying the card is only 250MHZ the same as saying its not a 9600pro? unless you can show me a 250mhz r9600pro you just inserted foot in mouth."
You are having a hard time even following your own arguments!"its never been in dispute huh? enough of your mindless drivel."
"this card" is not this fantasy Radeon 9550XT that does not exist in Newegg's catalog.
WRONG the card on newegg IS the 9550XT.It should be noted the review is of the 9550 "XT" with much higher clocks than the card sold at Newegg.
WRONG the card is indeed on newegg and you can find it here. the only part the does not exist on newegg is the 2 letters X and T. of course the card and box show different but you cant see that.this card is not this fantasy Radeon 9550XT that does not exist in Newegg's catalog
WRONG I got this @ newegg but sure tell me its only 250mhz because newegg has incorrect specs. the fact that you say its "not likely" that newegg would make this mistake implies that you think the specs are correct. which implies that you are saying the card is only 250mhz, which is where you got me confused by basically saying the card the OP linked to is 250mhz which would imply its slower than the jetway, and that is why i asked if you were still being delusional.Its still listed as 250/400 for nearly a month now. If it weren't 250/400, surely Newegg would have changed the specs after a week, two at the most, but a month? Not likely.
WRONG the card @ newegg is the platinum version like ive been saying for days. exact same card as reviewed on digital-life.That's great. If only that were the card offered in the Newegg catalog....but it isn't.
The Digit-Life Review is of the GeCube "Radeon 9550 128MB Platinum Edition". Digit-Life lists the different 9550 models being offered by Info-Tek
still with the same tired argument anyone with half a brain could determine neweggs mistake by reading the reviews on newegg or even looking at the pictures.Newegg's catalog:
Model# GC-R9550GU-C3
Item # N82E16814240021
Specifications:
Chipset/Core Speed: ATI RADEON 9550/250MHz
Memory/Effective Speed: 128MB DDR/400MHz
Not the same card. Thanks for playing.
OMG you were right for once!!! newegg did make a mistake. funny how you admit newegg made the mistake but argue like the mistake is the truth, again you make no sense.Newegg's mistake....for a month now.
Your first moment of clarity, it actually makes sense for once. I was confused for a moment as you kept pasting neweggs mistake like it was truth...you kept saying its not the same card as the XT which implies that the 250mhz clockspeed you pasted is correct. then you changed up and said the argument was if the card on newegg is the XT version or not. not a very good argument as this thread was started over this card and linked to newegg by the OP and you still call it a fantasy simply because newegg left out the "XT".The GeCube 9550XT is essentially a Radeon 9600 PRO. This much has never been in dispute
Originally posted by: dallas4u
Jeez... I'm so glad I wasted my time listening to you two bicker back and forth in a Hot Deals thread. If I was a computer noob a actually looking for a decently priced video card now I would be even MORE confused than before! :roll:
Is there any particular reason that you are 'replying' to statements I wrote in SEPTEMBER as if you only just noticed them hours ago, even though you've already replied to the exact same messages at least once already? I mean some reason besides you having no argument whatsoever to stand on, and in order to keep this alive, you have to reply to month-old statements already replied to?It should be noted the review is of the 9550 "XT" with much higher clocks than the card sold at Newegg.
WRONG the card on newegg IS the 9550XT.
AmDRaDeOn,10/12/2004 5:57:51 AM
this is the best deal for a midrange card! it comes clocked at 400/300 (same as 9600 pro) and it is recognized as a 9600XT in windows. This also comes with hynix 2.2ns memory. Got 13k in 3dmark01 at stock settings! great price for such a good card!
care to show me where i may find the expiration date of your statements, as i had no idea they could spoil.Is there any particular reason that you are 'replying' to statements I wrote in SEPTEMBER as if you only just noticed them hours ago
Makes no sense. let me make it clear for you. I agree the argument is about whether the card in the newegg catolog is or is not a radeon 9550XT. now refer to my above post where i make it blatantly obvious that the card is infact a 9550XT and so the argument that we both now agree we are having ...you lost.You have materially failed to show a single statement that is inconsistent with my position that the dispute has always been about whether the card in the Newegg catalog was or was not a Radeon 9550XT with 400MHz core and 500MHz memory. My position and the statements in support of them have been clear and consistent.
Ive made it clear exactly where you suggested that the jetway was faster. I even accepted the blame for letting your nonsense confuse me. let me paste it for you again.You are the one who has been confused about the nature of the dispute, arguing that the Radeon 9550XT is faster than the Jetway, as though someone said it was not, when nobody had suggested any such thing at any time
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Its still listed as 250/400 for nearly a month now. If it weren't 250/400, surely Newegg would have changed the specs after a week, two at the most, but a month? Not likely.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WRONG I got this @ newegg but sure tell me its only 250mhz because newegg has incorrect specs. the fact that you say its "not likely" that newegg would make this mistake implies that you think the specs are correct. which implies that you are saying the card is only 250mhz, which is where you got me confused by basically saying the card the OP linked to is 250mhz which would imply its slower than the jetway, and that is why i asked if you were still being delusional.
who is EVERYONE? do you have a gerbil up your @ss? Quotes please as I see only you and I...where is the everyone? hahahawhen it is clear to EVERYONE except you that this was never the case.
and at some point dont you begin to ask yourself, "Could the whole world be the problem...or perhaps I'm an idiot who just doesnt make sense."I've encountered TONS of imbeciles who couldn't follow my arguments
Instead of me disputing this with you...go dispute it with the reviewer at bit-tech who makes a nice chart showing price/performance compared to a R9600 and a 9600PRO.And I see you completely ignore that the GeCube is not any sort of a 'Hot Deal' by any sane definition
you could come to the conclusion that the GeCube 9550XT Platinum Edition offers value that could be labelled with words similar to the steal of the century.
Based on a price differential of nearly $50.00 between the 9550XT and 9600 PRO. What does that price differential have to do with the less than $10.00 price differential between 9550XT and 9600 PRO in the Newegg catalog? Have you ever thought about what you were going to say before you say it? Oh wait, we have the answer below...Instead of me disputing this with you...go dispute it with the reviewer at bit-tech who makes a nice chart showing price/performance compared to a R9600 and a 9600PRO.
I suppose that's as much of a confession as we're going to get that you are hopelessly confused. Even though it incorrectly blames me for your confusion, when a child can follow my clear and consistent statements without getting confused, I'm going to overlook that because the important part is where you confess to being confused. I'm glad you agree with me and I'd like to thank you for your candor - nuff said.I even accepted the blame for letting your nonsense confuse me.
Can you read? what part of go dispute it with the reviewer dont you understand? "What I'm going to say" is actually what he said....sheesh there is no getting through to you what so ever...im talking to someone with the IQ of a spoon.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instead of me disputing this with you...go dispute it with the reviewer at bit-tech who makes a nice chart showing price/performance compared to a R9600 and a 9600PRO.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on a price differential of nearly $50.00 between the 9550XT and 9600 PRO. What does that price differential have to do with the less than $10.00 price differential between 9550XT and 9600 PRO in the Newegg catalog? Have you ever thought about what you were going to say before you say it? Oh wait, we have the answer below...
More BS. And somehow you cant answer my yes or no question for the 2nd time and we both know why, either answer makes you look like a fool. keep responding and ignoring my questions....you look so intelligent.quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I even accepted the blame for letting your nonsense confuse me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose that's as much of a confession as we're going to get that you are hopelessly confused. Even though it incorrectly blames me for your confusion, when a child can follow my clear and consistent statements without getting confused, I'm going to overlook that because the important part is where you confess to being confused. I'm glad you agree with me and I'd like to thank you for your candor - nuff said.
Sentences are your friend dude.You are the one who has been confused about the nature of the dispute, arguing that the Radeon 9550XT is faster than the Jetway, as though someone said it was not, when nobody had suggested any such thing at any time, then becoming indignant when it was pointed out that nobody had suggested any such thing at any time, and you wanting to ARGUE about whether someone had, when it is clear to EVERYONE except you that this was never the case.