First Unreal Engine 4 Screenshots now available

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
I

itzbiff

Member
May 1, 2012
129
0
76
The new engine better blow my mind.

And i hope they are not building it from the ground up with consoles in mind.
 
evident

evident

Lifer
Apr 5, 2005
12,130
749
126
itzbiff said:
The new engine better blow my mind.

And i hope they are not building it from the ground up with consoles in mind.
Click to expand...

with their current trend of doing so with UE3 games, what would make you think otherwise
 
S

soccerballtux

Lifer
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
BTRY B 529th FA BN said:
If he's lobbying to MS and Sony then there is no doubt or question anymore for me that consoles are the cash cow for gaming studios. Obviously Sony and MS are holding Epic back. Seems Epic is ready and are not sure whether to go the demanding hardware route or crap i mean console route, which is well known as not being as powerful as their PC counter-parts. My hope is that they make an Unreal Tournament IV with UT99 like menus and UT3 game-play with some additional movement options/advancements. UT3 is badass as it is for Dueling, DM, CTF, iCTF, Greed, Warfare. Diablo what?
Click to expand...

+1 UT3 menu sucks and is why nobody plays it anymore.

I still remember the "patch 2.0" notes released-- "extensive server browser UI overhaul" all they changed was making it black and displaying bots as players in the server so people would think the game was more populated. LMAO.
 
Stringjam

Stringjam

Golden Member
Jun 30, 2011
1,871
33
91
dagamer34 said:
....giving non-programmers the ability to edit game worlds in real time without having to re-compute in world lighting (which can take hours). Another example is better scripting of events, again to avoid the specialized need for programmers each time something is changed.
Click to expand...


Ah....so it's finally caught up to what CryEngine2 was doing in 2006. ;)
 
Lonbjerg

Lonbjerg

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2009
4,419
0
0
GrumpyGamerLP said:
You can't really judge a game engine from screenshots. You have to see it in action.

As far as what 3D chipsets they use in next gen hardware, they really need to keep the price down. IMHO, the only reason the Wii gained so much market share is because it was so damned cheap compared to the other consoles. Price is a major factor in a global recession. I think a big reason no one has released a new console in so long was the simple fact that it is financial suicide to try to launch a new system with the way the economy is.
Click to expand...

I remember when the first screenshots appeared of FEAR.

People where saying "MEH"..."looks bad"...then the game came out..all all those tools suddenly shut up ;)
 
WhipperSnapper

WhipperSnapper

Lifer
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
BTRY B 529th FA BN said:
Unreal Tournament III is the best out of them all, period.
Click to expand...

Lol.

That must be the reason why the original UT99 was over a hundred times more popular and successful than UT3 ever was, right? That must be the reason why UT99 had an active and vibrant clan scene and UT3 was pretty much DOA in those regards. Heck, UT 2004 also crushed UT3 in terms of popularity.

UT3 is widely regarded as a consolized abomination. The game play is OK, but everything that surrounds the game play is crap.
 
disappoint

disappoint

Lifer
Dec 7, 2009
10,132
382
126
LumbergTech said:
I hate the unreal engine....can't imagine they will make this one much better...

Anyone else feel this way? The games on the unreal engine just feel weird to me.
Click to expand...

Unreal engine was great when the original UT came out. It's been downhill ever since.
 
destrekor

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
WhipperSnapper said:
Lol.

That must be the reason why the original UT99 was over a hundred times more popular and successful than UT3 ever was, right? That must be the reason why UT99 had an active and vibrant clan scene and UT3 was pretty much DOA in those regards. Heck, UT 2004 also crushed UT3 in terms of popularity.

UT3 is widely regarded as a consolized abomination. The game play is OK, but everything that surrounds the game play is crap.
Click to expand...

Well - you also have to factor in the expanse of competitive multiplayer titles available today (and even around the releases of 2003/2004, and UT3), and then look at what was available around the original's release.

So many titles available now... I personally wouldn't expect even something like '99, released today with today's engine capabilities (minus the console-aspect), to pull in the crowd it had back then.
I was personally never a huge fan. Played the titles at LAN parties with my buddies, but beyond that, it never grabbed me.

That, and as much as some titles can really put some polish on the Unreal engine, it's quite rare, and the seemingly "default feel" of a UE-title is just godawful imho.
 
The|Hunter

The|Hunter

Member
Dec 5, 2011
145
1
81
It looks ok but nothing special, dynamic lightning and particle system looks good, but the rest meh.. I only hope they fixed that bs streaming from U3E, otherwise its double fail lol :biggrin:



Unreal tech why u no show Samaritan like type of character details, cloth, real hair, etc.? :)
 
Last edited:
Lonbjerg

Lonbjerg

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2009
4,419
0
0
The|Hunter said:
It looks ok but nothing special, dynamic lightning and particle system looks good, but the rest meh.. I only hope they fixed that bs streaming from U3E, otherwise its double fail lol :biggrin:



Unreal tech why u no show Samaritan like type of character details, cloth, real hair, etc.? :)
Click to expand...

Perhaps because what the wanted to showcase wasn't hair, cloth ect?

I swear, every tech demo should just consist of shiney, transparant or reflective surfaces..and all people would go "Oh looky...SHINEY!!!"...and not be any part wiser about what the techdemo showed or contained.
 
Stringjam

Stringjam

Golden Member
Jun 30, 2011
1,871
33
91
Lonbjerg said:
Perhaps because what the wanted to showcase wasn't hair, cloth ect?

I swear, every tech demo should just consist of shiney, transparant or reflective surfaces..and all people would go "Oh looky...SHINEY!!!"...and not be any part wiser about what the techdemo showed or contained.
Click to expand...


Well...because things like realistic hair and cloth physics are something that largely hasn't been implemented very well in video games - - so it's a big deal.

Developers can create static environments with incredible realism that make you truly feel immersed in the atmosphere.....but then some low-poly character waddles up with a plastic head and jerky animations and basically voids the whole feeling.

Granted, it's gotten a lot better, but is still not very close to believable. Having characters / clothing /etc..that moves and behaves realistically would be a huge step forward in gaming. I would love to see hair that can move like THIS in real-time - - realistic facial expressions that actually convey emotion, etc.

I think the ultimate tech demo would not consist of some flaming castle or pointy monster with fiery eyes......it would be of a normal human character interacting with the player in convincing fashion.
 
P

PrayForDeath

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2004
3,478
1
76
Stringjam said:
Granted, it's gotten a lot better, but is still not very close to believable. Having characters / clothing /etc..that moves and behaves realistically would be a huge step forward in gaming. I would love to see hair that can move like THIS in real-time - - realistic facial expressions that actually convey emotion, etc.
Click to expand...

Animation plays a huge part in making things seem realistic. Greater visual fidelity demands extremely complex animations to keep things looking realistic, and I think this is the key thing that's lacking in games today.

For example, the hair in that video looks realistic... until they start moving the head. Yeah, they've clearly spent a ton of effort on animating it, but it just doesn't move that way in real life. Maybe on a different planet with much lower gravity.
 
S

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
The video of this engine looks much more impressive than the screenshots. In certain ways it looks better than the Crysis 3 demo, but in other ways it doesn't. I like the massive world design of the Unreal demo, but I like the overall look of the foliage and the nature in Crysis 3.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom