• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Firefox 43 64 bit

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Easiest way to confirm you've got the 64-bit version is type "about:" in the address bar. All the build info is right there.
 
What's the purpose of a 64 bit browser when a 32 bit browser does the same.

In theory, building in 64-bit mode lets the compiler count on some extra registers being present in the CPU. It sometimes translates into minor performance gains.
 
What's the purpose of a 64 bit browser when a 32 bit browser does the same.

Because computers are 64 bit and have been 64 bit with 32 bit backwards compatibility for over a decade now. We need 64 bit Firefox for the same reason we needed a 32 bit Notepad. Eventually, we need to get programs all running in a 64 bit world.
 
FF 43 - more pocket ads, forces new search mode with single search engine (same as in Chrome).

I've finally stopped using it for good.
 
A far more direct way of confirming whether your version is 64-bit, run it, and run Task Manager to see whether its process is labelled as Firefox.exe *32 or just Firefox.exe.

IIRC Win10's TM doesn't tell you about 32-bit processes, so run Process Explorer, right-click on the process in question and click on Properties. 'Image' will say 32 or 64-bit.

Win10 task manager is the same basic thing as Win8 and it has (32 bit) marked next to 32 bit programs.
 
I can't believe that Firefox is now harassing me for donations every time I launch the browser now.

Thanks, but I've looked at their latest IRS filing, and they are making a hell of a lot more in income than I am. If Mozilla really needs more cash, perhaps they should stop paying their director $220K a year.

http://990s.foundationcenter.org/990_pdf_archive/200/200097189/200097189_201312_990.pdf

Anyone else seeing this? If so, it is a good reason to keep an older version.
 
I wish that I would have made it up:

BbLNXYw.png
 
I wish that I would have made it up:
Mine opened my home page and a tab like in your pic. I closed that tab and removed a little bit of code at the end of my homepage url. I did this where you set your home page and everything works normal now.

To be clear my homepage is https://duckduckgo.com/ and I removed the junk that was after .com/

I have no idea if just closing the nag tab or removing the code fixed the problem.

 
Last edited:
FF 64bit has been pretty good so far, good enough that I removed Waterfox.

But that donation nagging... what the f-, haven't gotten that.
 
Why my firefox is too slow and always hookup my PC?

It's a primitive browser that does all its heavy lifting in a single process. This is why the UI stutters/hangs when it's rendering a complex (or lots of simple) web page(s). See:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Multiprocess_Firefox

In current versions of desktop Firefox, the entire browser runs in a single operating system process. In particular, the JavaScript that runs the browser UI (also known as "chrome code") runs in the same process as the code in web pages (also known as "content" or "web content").
 
It's a primitive browser that does all its heavy lifting in a single process. This is why the UI stutters/hangs when it's rendering a complex (or lots of simple) web page(s). See:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Multiprocess_Firefox
Oh come on they have plugin handler running in a separate process 😀

On a serious note, they use threads, albeit not optimally, because I never can see Firefox use more than one CPU effectively, not even when multiple tabs are loading.
 
Back
Top