Originally posted by: slick230
Wow, NFS4 hasn't stopped by to chime in on this yet? He must only like to comment when it's a domestic automaker with recall troubles. :roll:
hahahaha
Originally posted by: slick230
Wow, NFS4 hasn't stopped by to chime in on this yet? He must only like to comment when it's a domestic automaker with recall troubles. :roll:
Originally posted by: slick230
Wow, NFS4 hasn't stopped by to chime in on this yet? He must only like to comment when it's a domestic automaker with recall troubles. :roll:
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
can anyone explain why, in the minds of some here, the Ford Recall generates such a response and the Ferrari recall almost none?
is it acceptable for ferrari to issue a recall and unacceptable for Ford to do so?
At the same time, whose fault is it that Ford's earned a rep for fault-ridden products? It's their own fault.Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
can anyone explain why, in the minds of some here, the Ford Recall generates such a response and the Ferrari recall almost none?
is it acceptable for ferrari to issue a recall and unacceptable for Ford to do so?
Originally posted by: halik
ferrari * > ford *
the burden of proof was on fords side - they were trying to show off to ferrari, not the other way around. Ferrraris aren't know for reliability or cheap maintenance... you must be thinking honda.
Either way you're missing the point. If you buy a ferrari, you make a statement about yourself. If you buy a ford...you buy a ford.
Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: halik
ferrari * > ford *
the burden of proof was on fords side - they were trying to show off to ferrari, not the other way around. Ferrraris aren't know for reliability or cheap maintenance... you must be thinking honda.
Either way you're missing the point. If you buy a ferrari, you make a statement about yourself. If you buy a ford...you buy a ford.
What statement? That you're a pompous money grabbing jackass who doesn't think it's enough to only have money, but you have to show the rest of the world that you have it too?
95% of Ferrari owners almost never drive their cars, and if they ever do, they rarely ever extract any sort of its potential.
Someone that buys a Ford GT on the other hand, is much more likely to be a car enthusiast who can actually appreciate what they have..
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
can anyone explain why, in the minds of some here, the Ford Recall generates such a response and the Ferrari recall almost none?
is it acceptable for ferrari to issue a recall and unacceptable for Ford to do so?
nothing wrong with going 200mph under the right conditions (as in not on the highwayOriginally posted by: austin316
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
What do you expect? It's a Ferrari.
Funny thread, by the way.
Agreed. A car that can go 200+ MPH and the word safety should not be used in the same sentence.
Originally posted by: yllus
At the same time, whose fault is it that Ford's earned a rep for fault-ridden products? It's their own fault.Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
can anyone explain why, in the minds of some here, the Ford Recall generates such a response and the Ferrari recall almost none?
is it acceptable for ferrari to issue a recall and unacceptable for Ford to do so?
The stigma might not be fair and akin to fighting an uphill battle, but they made their bed.
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: yllus
At the same time, whose fault is it that Ford's earned a rep for fault-ridden products? It's their own fault.Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
can anyone explain why, in the minds of some here, the Ford Recall generates such a response and the Ferrari recall almost none?
is it acceptable for ferrari to issue a recall and unacceptable for Ford to do so?
The stigma might not be fair and akin to fighting an uphill battle, but they made their bed.
BS, Look at JD Powers, Year after Year there are many manufacturers that worse than Ford.
i'll take JD powers word over the kind of stupidity that i read on a forum to judge a car manufacturers quality control.
fact is, fords are not NEARLY as bad as most of you antiamericans make them out to be. matter of fact many years in the mid to late 90's fords were better quality wise than Nissans.
That makes no sense whatsoever.Originally posted by: bR
maybe because people who can afford $300k cars couldn't give a crap if their cars break down?
Originally posted by: Wingznut
That makes no sense whatsoever.Originally posted by: bR
maybe because people who can afford $300k cars couldn't give a crap if their cars break down?
Well, if we are basing all of our opinions of quality on recalls, I guess Honda sucks too...Originally posted by: halik
Ferrraris aren't know for reliability or cheap maintenance... you must be thinking honda.
Ignition Flaw Leads to Honda Recall
November 1, 2003
Honda is recalling about 652,000 cars, minivans and sport utility vehicles to fix an ignition system flaw. The defect could allow the vehicles to roll after they've been stopped and the keys removed, federal regulators said.
The recall affects 1997 to 1999 Acura sedans, 1998 and 1999 Accord sedans, 1999 Odyssey minivans and 2002 CRV sport utilities, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said.
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
Originally posted by: yllus
At the same time, whose fault is it that Ford's earned a rep for fault-ridden products? It's their own fault.Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
can anyone explain why, in the minds of some here, the Ford Recall generates such a response and the Ferrari recall almost none?
is it acceptable for ferrari to issue a recall and unacceptable for Ford to do so?
The stigma might not be fair and akin to fighting an uphill battle, but they made their bed.
BS, Look at JD Powers, Year after Year there are many manufacturers that worse than Ford.
i'll take JD powers word over the kind of stupidity that i read on a forum to judge a car manufacturers quality control.
fact is, fords are not NEARLY as bad as most of you antiamericans make them out to be. matter of fact many years in the mid to late 90's fords were better quality wise than Nissans.
Originally posted by: halik
ferrari * > ford *
the burden of proof was on fords side - they were trying to show off to ferrari, not the other way around. Ferrraris aren't know for reliability or cheap maintenance... you must be thinking honda.
Either way you're missing the point. If you buy a ferrari, you make a statement about yourself. If you buy a ford...you buy a ford.
Originally posted by: KPSHAH316
Originally posted by: halik
ferrari * > ford *
the burden of proof was on fords side - they were trying to show off to ferrari, not the other way around. Ferrraris aren't know for reliability or cheap maintenance... you must be thinking honda.
Either way you're missing the point. If you buy a ferrari, you make a statement about yourself. If you buy a ford...you buy a ford.
this man is right.
And yes, when you buy a Ferrari, you are in a different class. The moron who posted that should DIAF. You buy a Ferrari 90% to show off to your friends and the rest of the world, 10% to drive it. I'll stick to good ole Benzes![]()
Originally posted by: bR
Originally posted by: KPSHAH316
Originally posted by: halik
ferrari * > ford *
the burden of proof was on fords side - they were trying to show off to ferrari, not the other way around. Ferrraris aren't know for reliability or cheap maintenance... you must be thinking honda.
Either way you're missing the point. If you buy a ferrari, you make a statement about yourself. If you buy a ford...you buy a ford.
this man is right.
And yes, when you buy a Ferrari, you are in a different class. The moron who posted that should DIAF. You buy a Ferrari 90% to show off to your friends and the rest of the world, 10% to drive it. I'll stick to good ole Benzes![]()
Heh. You maybe right... this country is full of showoffs. But then again there are more Benz showoffs than Ferrari showoffs.![]()
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
common, anyone that knows anything knows that ferraris aren't known for the quality, they are known for their "class". yup. every classy guy i know drives a ferrari.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know many classy guys, do you?
classy != flashy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i guess you missed the sarcasm there.
someone in the Ford GT thread said that the ferrari had more "class" than the ford.
obviously that's about as stupid a statement as someone can make about cars as neither car has anything to do with class.
Originally posted by: Gulzakar
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: PlatinumGold
common, anyone that knows anything knows that ferraris aren't known for the quality, they are known for their "class". yup. every classy guy i know drives a ferrari.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know many classy guys, do you?
classy != flashy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i guess you missed the sarcasm there.
someone in the Ford GT thread said that the ferrari had more "class" than the ford.
obviously that's about as stupid a statement as someone can make about cars as neither car has anything to do with class.
that would be me...
explain, oh mighty wise jackass how the ferrari lacks any class... so quick to punch...