Chaotic42
Lifer
- Jun 15, 2001
- 34,545
- 1,707
- 126
IIRC it starts in January.Isn't there a federal law about overtime now?
IIRC it starts in January.Isn't there a federal law about overtime now?
IIRC it starts in January.
1) It's a "regulation" which the labor department is supposed to enforce, not an actual law. Next president could overturn it.
2) It's been pending for a while because of lawsuits. So it'll be delayed until a couple more court rulings come down, anyway.
Being required to work more without additional compensation is something the GOP is apparently a-okay with.
Next president?
You mean the piece of shit who screws over his employees, investors, random strangers, and never pays taxes?
THAT president?
Next president?
You mean the piece of shit who screws over his employees, investors, random strangers, and never pays taxes?
THAT president?
They are lying to you.and he makes 25k a year. Since he is "management" he isn't eligible for overtime. He was recently promoted from hourly where he made 16k.
That's some American capitalism for ya,
OP didn't say what part of Fedex he worked for.They are lying to you.
Local manager here makes $79K, and we don't live in a big city.
Well obviously he just doesn't work hard enough and needs to pull himself up by his bootstraps.
Wait... what?
If the situation in the OP is true, he needs to work smarter, not harder.
Pulling oneself up by the bootstraps involves a good deal of judgment. The job in the OP is fine ... for a limited time and provided its a stepping stone to a better job. If its the peak of the career spectrum . . . time to start looking for how to make money in some other way.
It is amazing to me that so many people are willing to work themselves into the ground at a low paying job when there are plenty of opportunities in the trades to make better money and work less.
When the "OMG TRADES" goldrush taps out, the newly-minted welders, mechanics, and electricians will be working retail alongside the STEM grads and the Law School grads who didn't make the cut for the finite number of jobs in their field.
While there's no shortage of dumbasses either, I'm not willing to assume that somebody is one of them just because they work too hard for too little pay.
Look . . . people do what they do for their own reasons. There is no silver bullet to fix every situation, nor should there be. And there will ALWAYS be people who are underpaid and overworked. My point is that people who are dissatisfied with their lot in life should take steps to change that situation, and stop letting life "happen" to them. If the guy in the OP is happy with his position, fine. Who am I to judge?
But if he is not satisfied with his situation . . . the solution isn't to keep running on the hampster wheel hoping that someone else will get him out of it. There are always opportunities out there. Will finding the right opportunities take some effort? Sure. Will they take some luck? Absolutely. But if you go through life thinking that there are no opportunities because they are not intuitively obvious to you or you are too busy to pursue them, you might as well give up because you have already lost.
Succeeding in the work force is a lot like succeeding in the gym. If you don't put enough of the right effort in, with the right support and/or secondary considerations, you probably won't realize your potential. A trainer can't "make" a person fit, just like the government can't "make" a person succeed in the work force.
You're right. My point is that the "flyover States" make up the MAJORITY of the country and the ones influencing policy and making laws think their living situation is average when they're at the top.
Well obviously he just doesn't work hard enough and needs to pull himself up by his bootstraps.
Wait... what?
So the 1st 18 years was a waste and the government needs to hold their hand a little longer. Sounds like great parenting.And like making progress athletically, it takes time.
What government can and should do is make sure that people who feel like they don't have any other option at the moment, or who don't have any opportunities right this second aren't being eaten alive by their jobs. So they have the time and energy to plan and execute their self-improvement.
Also, health insurance. A LOT of people stay in crappy jobs because their kids are on some weird meds or something that cost more than rent.
1) It's a "regulation" which the labor department is supposed to enforce, not an actual law. Next president could overturn it.
2) It's been pending for a while because of lawsuits. So it'll be delayed until a couple more court rulings come down, anyway.
Being required to work more without additional compensation is something the GOP is apparently a-okay with.