Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What I want to know is how all these people with no real medical condition are able to get perscriptions?
Everybody suffers from self hate. Maybe pot can help folks to gain insight and relief from a needless disease.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What I want to know is how all these people with no real medical condition are able to get perscriptions?
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What I want to know is how all these people with no real medical condition are able to get perscriptions?
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What I want to know is how all these people with no real medical condition are able to get perscriptions?
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What I want to know is how all these people with no real medical condition are able to get perscriptions?
Everybody suffers from self hate. Maybe pot can help folks to gain insight and relief from a needless disease.
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What I want to know is how all these people with no real medical condition are able to get perscriptions?
Everybody suffers from self hate. Maybe pot can help folks to gain insight and relief from a needless disease.
You must have a severe affliction then.
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
That's his problem, and one of many reasons he's not suited for the job. Unfortunately, no one in this country remembers anything about US civics, so they don't understand the simple division of power in our government.Originally posted by: bamacre
Apparently, Obama disagreed with you when he stated he would stop the raids.
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What I want to know is how all these people with no real medical condition are able to get perscriptions?
Everybody suffers from self hate. Maybe pot can help folks to gain insight and relief from a needless disease.
You must have a severe affliction then.
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Andrew1990
Obama, Change you can believe in!
Just had to throw that in there, but I would think the economy would require more attention now then a few Drug Raids.
Yeah, unless it's you being raided for no reason.
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
If it's against federal law, and they had a warrant (both of which appear to be the case here), then there is a reason. It's not the job of the president to pick and choose which laws will be enforced: it is his job to enforce the laws on the books.Originally posted by: bamacre
Yeah, unless it's you being raided for no reason.
Apparently, Obama disagreed with you when he stated he would stop the raids.
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Originally posted by: CLite
Originally posted by: bamacre
No arrests, but their are stealing, I mean seizing, cash and goods.
stealing? come on, unless you subscribe to a conspiracy theory they are just going to destroy the evidence after the case is closed. Anyways, I agree the raid sucks but I think people are blowing this out of proportion, if it happens again well thats something different imo.
uh, seizing the cash and goods of the providers, costs them hundreds of thousands of dollars... basically, the Fed is trying to get them to fold by making them lose money...
Originally posted by: Train
Originally posted by: TallBill
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What I want to know is how all these people with no real medical condition are able to get perscriptions?
Everybody suffers from self hate. Maybe pot can help folks to gain insight and relief from a needless disease.
You must have a severe affliction then.
Shit man you haven't added him to the ignore list yet?
Havent you noticed only of handful of people ever even acknowledge his posts? Thats cuz everyone else blocked his spam years ago.
The White House said it expects those kinds of raids to end once Mr. Obama nominates someone to take charge of DEA, which is still run by Bush administration holdovers.
?The president believes that federal resources should not be used to circumvent state laws, and as he continues to appoint senior leadership to fill out the ranks of the federal government, he expects them to review their policies with that in mind," White House spokesman Nick Shapiro said.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: IGBT
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Obama should be impeached.
..that's too easy. special prosecutors, hearings, investigations and depositions are in order first.
No way. Obama had his chance to bring change. Too late now.
Originally posted by: alchemize
Stolen from Digg...
DEA continues pot raids Obama opposes
The White House said it expects those kinds of raids to end once Mr. Obama nominates someone to take charge of DEA, which is still run by Bush administration holdovers.
?The president believes that federal resources should not be used to circumvent state laws, and as he continues to appoint senior leadership to fill out the ranks of the federal government, he expects them to review their policies with that in mind," White House spokesman Nick Shapiro said.
:thumbsup:
Kerlikowske Leaving to Serve as Obama's Drug Czar
Posted by Dominic Holden on Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Several nonprofits on the East Coast have sent me emails today rumoring that Seattle Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske is a candidate for Drug Czar. The nonprofits have asked at least a dozen people around the city how Kerlikowske has performed on drug-policy issues, apparently with the task of reporting back to someone. But they refuse to identify who?presumably, someone in the Obama Administration?the rumor has come from. The SPD would not comment on the rumor. However, as I was writing this, the Seattle Times posted an article that says Kerlikowske will leave the department for "a federal law-enforcement position in the Obama Administration." An anonymous FBI source in the article says that Kerlikowske is headed to a cabinet position?maybe the drug czar seat. Based on the murmurs I'm hearing from D.C., it seems likely he is, indeed, going to be our next drug czar.
Formally known as Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, Kerlikowske would oversee federal anti-drug spending and lobby Congress to set policy. A progressive drug czar?which I think Kerlikowske would be, based on his lack of opposition to drug-policy reforms around Seattle?would support bills to allow federal funding for needle exchange, block pot raids in states with medical marijuana laws, and support anti-drug ads that make some sense; a bad drug czar would do what we've been doing for the last 20 years.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
A great warrior is he who chooses his battles.
Originally posted by: bamacre
One today...
http://www.contracostatimes.com/california/ci_11619733
Ok, so he hasn't been in office for a month yet, but when exactly does this become a broken promise? How hard is it to make a phone call or send an email saying "stop?" As someone who believes that all federal drug laws should be removed from the books, I find these raids ridiculous.
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
A great warrior is he who chooses his battles.
And a worthless empty suit chooses never to fight a battle.
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
A great warrior is he who chooses his battles.
And a worthless empty suit chooses never to fight a battle. Chalk up another lie by Obama. When is this man going to learn how to lead? He could end this tomorrow but he chooses not to because he is weak.
