• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

fear my Hitlerism!

Originally posted by: Zakath15
Hitlerism = Naziism... I've made the same mistake a few times, actually.
Click to expand...

We americans are known for creating new words for the good of the english language. Don't hate.
 
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Hitlerism = Naziism... I've made the same mistake a few times, actually.
Click to expand...

yeah, I pointed that out in another thread. But in fairness, without Hilter, there wouldn't have been a "naziism".

 
Originally posted by: hagbard
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Hitlerism = Naziism... I've made the same mistake a few times, actually.
Click to expand...

yeah, I pointed that out in another thread. But in fairness, without Hilter, there wouldn't have been a "naziism".
Click to expand...

Mmm... I don't know enough about the history of the Nazi party to make a full commentary... but I would agree, mostly.
 
Why is it that the people against bush can only come up with calling him a moron or a nazi. Why don't you PROVE that sadam has absolutely no weapons until then call him a moron, because it takes one to know one.
 
Originally posted by: BigJelly
Why is it that the people against bush can only come up with calling him a moron or a nazi. Why don't you PROVE that sadam has absolutely no weapons until then call him a moron, because it takes one to know one.
Click to expand...

What about the 3 mobile bio weapons labs that Saddam has?
 
Originally posted by: BigJelly
Why is it that the people against bush can only come up with calling him a moron or a nazi. Why don't you PROVE that sadam has absolutely no weapons until then call him a moron, because it takes one to know one.
Click to expand...


No need to ask cause you won't get a decent answer, only conspiracies. One of the major fallacies of opponents of George Bush is to underestimate him.
 
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: BigJelly
Why is it that the people against bush can only come up with calling him a moron or a nazi. Why don't you PROVE that sadam has absolutely no weapons until then call him a moron, because it takes one to know one.
Click to expand...


No need to ask cause you won't get a decent answer, only conspiracies. One of the major fallacies of opponents of George Bush is to underestimate him.
Click to expand...

That was my point 😉
 
Like liberals have never made mistakes or verbal slips. Just ask Gore about "inventing the internet"......
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Zakath15
Hitlerism = Naziism... I've made the same mistake a few times, actually.
Click to expand...

We americans are known for creating new words for the good of the english language. Don't hate.
Click to expand...

You mean like normalcy (past) and hispanically (present)? 😕

Do you remember cheesy... we're still inventing words... I think friggin is pretty new. Fugly is definitely more popular than before. I'm seeing if I can get f-tard to stick. 😛
 
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: BigJelly
Why is it that the people against bush can only come up with calling him a moron or a nazi. Why don't you PROVE that sadam has absolutely no weapons until then call him a moron, because it takes one to know one.
Click to expand...


No need to ask cause you won't get a decent answer, only conspiracies. One of the major fallacies of opponents of George Bush is to underestimate him.
Click to expand...

I don't underestimate his handlers.

 
Originally posted by: flavio
Originally posted by: BigJelly
Originally posted by: flavio
PROVE that sadam has absolutely no weapons
Click to expand...

Prove that you don't have any.
Click to expand...

Just the respose i'd expect.
rolleye.gif
Click to expand...

The "rolling eyes" are pretty predictable as well, when you don't have anything to say.
Click to expand...

LOL you prove that sadam doesnt have weapons, becuase all the republicans had to prove, and they did, was that sadam wasnt disarming. Prove he doesnt have WMDs and then ill listen. Its just that, the anti war movement has NO proof it just hates republicans and bush; it's really and anti-republican movement. Where were they when clinton launched missiles at iraq.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top