Favorite toothbrush?

[TridenT]

you are comparing your iphone to a camera.

this is why you are stupid.

You're comparing a camera to a camera.

My Canon Powershot SD400 from 5 years ago will take photos that are about just as shitty, maybe a bit better but not much.

It's all about the fucking equipment.

 

[Malak]

It's all about the fucking equipment.

That's what she said.

 

[zinfamous]

You're comparing a camera to a camera.

My Canon Powershot SD400 from 5 years ago will take photos that are about just as shitty, maybe a bit better but not much.

It's all about the fucking equipment.

lol, trident, lol. I love me a good SLR, (And I have a modern DSLR as well as an AE1-Program, c. 1978, I think?) but you honestly don't understand the argument, do you?



anyway, as far as the toothbrush argument goes:sure there is a qualitative difference between the electric class and the manual class, but I think within those classes, it's still nothing but marketing BS with a bunch of nebulous "studies" tossed in to create some perceived difference of 0.05% value.

I tend to liken the electric toothbrush industry to the razor industry. --especially now that we have "vibrating" razors! OOOOO!

the funny thing is, from straight razor to safety razor, there has been no discernible increase in tool quality. The safety razor (today's standard), only added the greater safety of shaving, which is certainly true. But other than that, the quality of the shave is still rather inferior to a tool that has been around since Roman times--whose biggest advancement came with the development of superior mirrors (you could now shave yourself!).

2 blades? 3 blades...5 blades? lol. vibrating blades? lol. Pure BS.


Amazing, the pack of lies and BS upon which companies like Gillette have built their fortunes; and god bless them for it. 😀

 

[ElFenix]

sonicare

 

[TridenT]

lol, trident, lol. I love me a good SLR, (And I have a modern DSLR as well as an AE1-Program, c. 1978, I think?) but you honestly don't understand the argument, do you?



anyway, as far as the toothbrush argument goes:sure there is a qualitative difference between the electric class and the manual class, but I think within those classes, it's still nothing but marketing BS with a bunch of nebulous "studies" tossed in to create some perceived difference of 0.05% value.

I tend to liken the electric toothbrush industry to the razor industry. --especially now that we have "vibrating" razors! OOOOO!

the funny thing is, from straight razor to safety razor, there has been no discernible increase in tool quality. The safety razor (today's standard), only added the greater safety of shaving, which is certainly true. But other than that, the quality of the shave is still rather inferior to a tool that has been around since Roman times--whose biggest advancement came with the development of superior mirrors (you could now shave yourself!).

2 blades? 3 blades...5 blades? lol. vibrating blades? lol. Pure BS.


Amazing, the pack of lies and BS upon which companies like Gillette have built their fortunes; and god bless them for it. 😀

There is very significant difference in camera equipment. No matter how good the fucking photographer is, they will get shit photos with a shit camera in a non-ideal situation.

I don't give a shit about the whole electric toothbrush stuff. I'm just saying you're wrong about cameras.

 

[zinfamous]

There is very significant difference in camera equipment. No matter how good the fucking photographer is, they will get shit photos with a shit camera in a non-ideal situation.

I don't give a shit about the whole electric toothbrush stuff. I'm just saying you're wrong about cameras.

...yet you are still incapable of understanding the argument, it seems.

Lenses are a technical argument, but they don't take pictures. Photographers do.

And I'm pretty certain that I own far more camera equipment: lenses, filters, flashes than you do.