FarCry or HL2? It has been polled.

[VIAN]

I chose FarCry.

Inspiration for this thread goes to this thread.

 

[Unkno]

HL2.

 

[clamum]

Half-Life 2

 

[xTYBALTx]

Originally posted by: Unkno
HL2.

 

[CKent]

FC >>> D3 >>>>> HL2

 

[homercles337]

HL2 hands down.

/thread

 

[BW86]

Originally posted by: RBachman
FC <<<< D3 <<<< HL2

fixed

 

[Parkre]

where's the both button?

 

[VIAN]

FC >>> D3 >>>>> HL2

I think I agree with you on this one.

 

[EpsiIon]

Originally posted by: RBachman
FC >>> D3 >>>>> HL2

I can not respect the opinion of anybody who rates that crapfest tech demo higher than HL2.

 

[Jon855]

Originally posted by: BW86

Originally posted by: RBachman
FC <<<< D3 <<<< HL2

fixed

I will SECOND THAT

/thread

 

[yukichigai]

HL2 will have more expansions

FarCry has x64 support and is the most beautiful game I've ever played

So... HL2, narrowly. The plot's pretty good, but I know I'm going to wind up playing a lot more HL2 content than FarCry content.

 

[Cobalt]

I just got FarCry two days ago, so far I'm liking it more. There is just more to do, etc. I also believe HL2 was one of the most overrated games ever.

 

[Czar]

farcry

hl2 was alot more polished, better story, better characters but

farcry was by far more impressive, better gameplay and you felt more like a part of the world

 

[monster64]

HL2 by far

 

[Nextman916]

FAR CRY graphics are far better HL2. HL2 engine isnt really anything demanding as most computers can play it used to on my old mx440 on med settings. Althought i still admit it looks quite good but far cry just a smidge better. Also i enjoyed far cry's story more.

 

[mode101wpb]

FAR CRY, because it's the best $20.00 I spent on a game since the original Half-Life and Deus Ex. I have yet to buy HL2.

 

[Slogun]

Originally posted by: Nextman916
HL2 engine isnt really anything demanding as most computers can play it used to on my old mx440 on med settings.

That's hardly something to criticize a game for. Smart developers make a game scalable to play on as many home computers as possible, hence a chance at more sales...

 

[Nextman916]

Originally posted by: Slogun

Originally posted by: Nextman916
HL2 engine isnt really anything demanding as most computers can play it used to on my old mx440 on med settings.

That's hardly something to criticize a game for. Smart developers make a game scalable to play on as many home computers as possible, hence a chance at more sales...

I agree it was smart but it still doesnt look as good as far cry, expecially if you have seen in 64-bit with sm 3.0.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Far Cry, although not by too much. Both completely pwn Doom 3 though.

 

[skace]

All 3 games are good at different things, yet people continue to try to pick one above the others for some reason. I don't get it, oh well. I for one am glad I played and beat all 3.

 

[Nextman916]

screw doom 3 that game sucked

 

[duragezic]

Wow, HL2 is so well-programmed that it can run on some pretty old, oudated machines, yet this is an aspect that receives criticism. What do you want them to do? Make it dual-core only so you and 3% of gamers can play it?

Although I pick HL2 for having superior multiplayer (HUGE, +excellent mod support makes a game that lasts, much more important than other parts), story, sound, performance, etc etc, Far Cry did blow me away with it's amazing environments and graphics. I bought a Barton and a 9800Pro and Far Cry was one of the first I tried with my new computer. Very immersive game, but the whole package wasn't quite on par with HL2, although it did get released a bit earlier (still, fvck the a-hole hackers that delayed HL2 in the first place).

 

[duragezic]

Originally posted by: EpsiIon

Originally posted by: RBachman
FC >>> D3 >>>>> HL2

I can not respect the opinion of anybody who rates that crapfest tech demo higher than HL2.

:thumbsup: Wow, couldn't resist.

 

[BFG10K]

Far Cry because Steam sucks chunks.