What about boycotting that business to pressure them to keep the racially offensive name? That must also be wrong using this "logic."
That falls under the futhering 'asshole' purposes I was talking about.
That's freedom!
What about boycotting that business to pressure them to keep the racially offensive name? That must also be wrong using this "logic."
Thank you. I wish everyone would lighten up and quit looking for stuff to complain about.
A private business makes a private decision to change its name (for commercial reasons or even perhaps because they themselves now feel a bit uncomfortable about it) and (presumably) pro-private-business Conservatives get worked up about it. I find that strange.
I could understand there would be something to argue about if it were the government ordering them to change against their wishes, but its their business, if they now feel they need to change the name (which pretty obviously will offend quite a lot of people and probably needs constant explaining and defending to potential customers) its their prerogative to change it. What's the problem?
I definitely agree that what _does_ say something sad about the modern world is that it needed an outside 'consultant' to tell Joe to call his steak place 'Joe's steaks'. How did that conversation go? "Wow, I was going to go with 'Tim's Tofu' but, 'Joe's Steaks' works much better, that's brilliant!"