Originally posted by: caferace
Originally posted by: Insidious
I hope some of the people we lost because they had single core machines see this...
Your relevance has been returned. :thumbsup:
It's about time Stanford realized they had "priced single core PCs out" with their outrageously generous scoring of the newer clients.
-Sid
Maybe it's time to un-retire my FX-55 proc that's been sitting in a box the last six months?
😉
-jim
Nah ,just ship it to me instead I deal with for ya
😉
Good to hear about this scoring re-balance
🙂 [edit]I hope they sort out the missing points issue quickly!:Q
Slider76
Thanks for thr update on the GPU clients :thumbsup: ,good to hear more cards being supported
🙂 ,though it's still a shame about the 8800s.
scottv67
I believe Sid meant that the score for multi core clients was
disproportionally higher than single core clients (in other words way beyond the doubling/ quadrupling due to 2/4 cores & more efficient CPUs).He didn't say they they shouldn't score more.
(correct me if I'm wrong Sid :thumbsup
🙂
Personally I haven't a clue, stanfords scoring often just makes my head
😕
markfw
So to be "green" we should all replace out single core and X2 boxes with Q6600's !
lol
😀 ,I'm surprised you guys with the large fleets haven't seriously looked into Solar panels.I hear their getting cheaper ,& getting cheaper more quickly (though I've no idea of prices I'm afraid) ,& seeing as you guys in the states have lots of land why not a full size wind turbine too
😉
It's been some years since we've discussed solar panels around here ,I vaguely recall either LANMAN or Networkman took a serious look at it then but it was far too expensive at the time.
