F@H: CLI becomes competative?!

[Rebel44]

Originally posted by: biodoc
I'm back to SMP

No word from Stanford on the p3906 WU credit yet

They probably took the weekend off

There is info in forum about this but only betatesters have access to that part of forum...

So current info is that 2 servers that have 3906 and 3907 are testing some updated software and that all returned WUs will be credited but it will take some time because they will sync those servers with rest of their systems only after they get rid of some bugs....

 

[biodoc]

Originally posted by: Rebel44

Originally posted by: biodoc
I'm back to SMP

No word from Stanford on the p3906 WU credit yet

They probably took the weekend off

There is info in forum about this but only betatesters have access to that part of forum...

So current info is that 2 servers that have 3906 and 3907 are testing some updated software and that all returned WUs will be credited but it will take some time because they will sync those servers with rest of their systems only after they get rid of some bugs....

Thanks Rebel44! Those servers must be reporting stats now 'cause I got credit for mine!

:beer:

 

[Insidious]

I think it credited me last night. (Kind of hard to tell.)

Be sure not to tell ScottV67.... if he finds out he got points for his crunching it'll ruin his whole experience. :laugh:

Keep on crunchin!

:beer:

-Sid

 

[Assimilator1]

Originally posted by: caferace

Originally posted by: Insidious
I hope some of the people we lost because they had single core machines see this...
Your relevance has been returned. :thumbsup:

It's about time Stanford realized they had "priced single core PCs out" with their outrageously generous scoring of the newer clients.

-Sid

Maybe it's time to un-retire my FX-55 proc that's been sitting in a box the last six months?

-jim

Nah ,just ship it to me instead I deal with for ya

Good to hear about this scoring re-balance [edit]I hope they sort out the missing points issue quickly!:Q

Slider76
Thanks for thr update on the GPU clients :thumbsup: ,good to hear more cards being supported ,though it's still a shame about the 8800s.

scottv67
I believe Sid meant that the score for multi core clients was disproportionally higher than single core clients (in other words way beyond the doubling/ quadrupling due to 2/4 cores & more efficient CPUs).He didn't say they they shouldn't score more.
(correct me if I'm wrong Sid :thumbsup
Personally I haven't a clue, stanfords scoring often just makes my head

markfw
So to be "green" we should all replace out single core and X2 boxes with Q6600's !

lol ,I'm surprised you guys with the large fleets haven't seriously looked into Solar panels.I hear their getting cheaper ,& getting cheaper more quickly (though I've no idea of prices I'm afraid) ,& seeing as you guys in the states have lots of land why not a full size wind turbine too
It's been some years since we've discussed solar panels around here ,I vaguely recall either LANMAN or Networkman took a serious look at it then but it was far too expensive at the time.