• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Exclusive: First charges filed in Mueller investigation

Page 27 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
K1052 said:
Steele was paid $168K

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...rump-dossier-u-s-firm-discloses-idUSKBN1D15XH

Also there is a subtle difference between paying (an ex brit spy in this case) for opposition research and actively engaging a hostile foreign government in coordination to use illegally obtained documents in order to sway the election in you favor...presumably in exchange for some later favorable treatments.
Click to expand...
if proven to be true everyone involved should go to jail I think the biggest problem we face now is, who is telling the truth and how can we be sure? Sure is looking like both sides are no good.
 
Doc Savage Fan said:
The question was incredibly convoluted, rambling and confusing imo.
Click to expand...

Gawd. Sessions volunteered a false answer that didn't answer the question directly.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...ons_about_russia_in_confirmation_hearing.html

He could have just said "Well, I'd have to look into it." Easy-peasy & skate right on by. But that's not what happened. If his meeting with Kislyak ever became public knowledge he could say nobody asked him about it & be telling the truth.

As you've said, it can be easy to forget. OTOH, I seriously doubt that Sessions forgot about meeting with Kislyak in his own office a few months earlier. It's not something he'd do everyday.
 
J.Wilkins said:
I'm sorry but you're the idiot that fell for "Obama gave Russia 20% of US uranium"...

She's right about you, you're not intelligent enough to understand anything that you are not spoon fed by right wing propaganda.
Click to expand...
Thanks J! My self-esteem appreciates an intelligent person's affirmation!
 
Younigue said:
Thanks J! My self-esteem appreciates an intelligent person's affirmation!
Click to expand...

I would love to say "at your service" as that is an Englishmans go to but in this case... This fucker needs to buy a brain because he just cannot think.

Also, I noted the compliment and if I may be so bold, milady, I shall return the sentiment. 😉
 
Doc Savage Fan said:
LOL...this place rocks!
Click to expand...
In part because of me? BUT, I'm fairly certain we established a while back you don't particularly like me. I DO Rock though. Look at you getting it right once. Cause for some sort of celebration or is this a hide under your bed until the scary goes away or you fall asleep, whichever comes first. Suggestion: though [be advised] you might get a kink in your neck from watching under your bed, watch Franken question Sessions.
 
J.Wilkins said:
I would love to say "at your service" as that is an Englishmans go to but in this case... This fucker needs to buy a brain because he just cannot think.

Also, I noted the compliment and if I may be so bold, milady, I shall return the sentiment. 😉
Click to expand...
Right on J!
 
Jhhnn said:
Gawd. Sessions volunteered a false answer that didn't answer the question directly.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...ons_about_russia_in_confirmation_hearing.html

He could have just said "Well, I'd have to look into it." Easy-peasy & skate right on by. But that's not what happened. If his meeting with Kislyak ever became public knowledge he could say nobody asked him about it & be telling the truth.

As you've said, it can be easy to forget. OTOH, I seriously doubt that Sessions forgot about meeting with Kislyak in his own office a few months earlier. It's not something he'd do everyday.
Click to expand...


I'm not sure why someone who is supposed to be smarter that we are (only the best in government, right?) would have trouble understand the question. It was dead simple. Sessions is either senile and therefore unable to perform the duties of his office or he lied. I'm going with the second.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
I'm not sure why someone who is supposed to be smarter that we are (only the best in government, right?) would have trouble understand the question. It was dead simple. Sessions is either senile and therefore unable to perform the duties of his office or he lied. I'm going with the second.
Click to expand...

I'm confused, I know we were supposed to hate Sessions but then Mueller happened and it seemed we were supposed to like Sessions, now we're supposed to hate Sessions again?
Ugh this year is so confusing
 
Fanatical Meat said:
I'm confused, I know we were supposed to hate Sessions but then Mueller happened and it seemed we were supposed to like Sessions, now we're supposed to hate Sessions again?
Ugh this year is so confusing
Click to expand...
when were we supposed to like sessions, hes an archaic tool to the million power.
 
hey look, it's that volunteer coffee boy again...

DNlsPGfU8AAATtH.jpg
 
Fanatical Meat said:
I'm confused, I know we were supposed to hate Sessions but then Mueller happened and it seemed we were supposed to like Sessions, now we're supposed to hate Sessions again?
Ugh this year is so confusing
Click to expand...


I don't hate Sessions, that is an emotion which requires much effort to maintain. Instead I find it sad that for whatever reason he has been dishonest. In any case he is responsible for his actions and is accountable for them, or should be.

I'd rather Sessions not have done this because his recusal has been a buffer between Trump and Mueller.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top