PCResources
IF you were trained as you say, you would know there is absolutely no way to tell how someone will react in a given situation trained or no.
As for the AK74, it kicked a bit less that the 47, but split cases because of margunal ammo were a real problem with the 7.62X39 ammo as nearly every country in the world started to make it. the '74 had a slightly and more complex trigger mechanism that slowed the rate of fire. The Ak47 was always known for it's incredible reliability under adverse conditions and the new trigger group just added to the legend as far as I'm concerned. The new round was called 'poison bullets' by the Afgans and they were the first to find out. I'm a fan of the new NATO 5.56 and prefer Canadien made SS109 ammo and have shot several Chinese variants that shhot either the NATO or the Rssian round. The 5.56 has less muzzle rise, but that varies with the design of the brake and there are plenty of those to experiment with! I shot a RPK version with a 'cutts' compensor that was dead level in full auto...no muzzle climb at all...drums of ammo were literally a blast!
myputer
I do not mean to poke fun at your concern, but there is no known correlation between training and actual use of a firearm during a stressful situation. Most that apply for a carry permit already are quite proficient with firearms and how to handle them safely. According to the FBI, a legal Citizen carrying a firearm is less apt to be involved in ANY crime and have a quit a bit less chance of being a vicyim simple because the responsibility makes that person more aware and thus more careful where he might go.
<< Why aren't people prosecuted when a child gets their gun and kills someone? >>
More State Laws are addressing this and they are supported by the NRA and other pro-gun groups.
<< What is the problem with a waiting period, why do people flip out over this? >>
There are no statistics that show waiting periods do anything. The Brady Law was only passed by a bi-partisan vote and with the consent of the NRA as part of the agreement was after 5 years it would revert to instant background checks. We can argue what the FBI did with the millions that were supposed to be spent on the system, but as of yet it is not perfect. Lately, you here rheortic about 'Closing The Gun Show Loophole.' That would prevent individuals from selling to individuals and make all sorts of notifications and liability the responsibility of the Gun Show Promoter. Dealers and individuals already have a quagmire of laws to obey. This is simply an attempt to make someone liable and to bankrupt a businessman through litigation.
The anti-gun groups have made it known that a complete disarming of the public is their goal. The NRA and like groups have gone along with law after law. Over 22,000 laws are on the books and another law was NEVER the answer to the crime rate.
Good questions!