Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: meltdown75
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: meltdown75
I read the fvcking post QBM. The subject line might as well be, "Ever had the urge to cut someone's head off?" and then saying, "Well, I have, but I'm not going to do it. Guess I just needed to post about it."
WTF is about all I have to say to that. Go ahead, defend him. Ridiculous.
So why don't you post something like this in every other rant thread where someone feels like killing the guy who cut him off in traffic, or wants to backhand the idiot who can't use a cash register at Staples?
There's a difference between getting angry and actually beating/killing someone. Are you unable to make that distinction?
Certain issues stand out a *little* more than others. Do you at least agree with me on that?
You know what - if you can't own up to the fact that your OP is ill-advised AT BEST, I'm done here anyway.
I've witnessed violence in the home FIRST HAND so forgive me if I'm not "down" with someone asking other members if they ever "really wanted to slap their SO".
How is my post ill-advised? To be ill-advised means to be done without thought or consideration beforehand. Maybe if I was running for office, I could see how this would be ill-advised, as posting it would have an adverse effect on me, but I'm not running for office. What's the problem with this thread?
Are you saying I shouldn't have posted it becuase you disagree with me?
What exactly do you even disagree with me about? You're actually offended by something I *thought* about for an instant while I was angry this morning? Something that, as you can see from many of the replies in this thread, is pretty commonly thought about.