Europe, the failure in the making

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
The US does the same thing!

You maroon, thats NOT the same thing! Not even REMOTELY.
Show me where in ANY Constituion for ANY European country abortion is protected. Cant do it can you?
Now show me in OUR Consitution where gun ownership is protected....

See the difference?
Yes I do but in the larger picture the US is trying to force it's moral views on others which is not that much different.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,892
46,813
136
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: sandorski
Ok, I see. Troll away then. :roll:

Oh damn your dumb. I take it you have literacy problems of some type? I mean, I *clearly* stated "Read my previous post" and you obviously couldnt do it.
Deny it all you want, the EU (Or more directly the UN) DOES want to undermine our Constitution.

He asked for examples, didn't he? I haven't seen any.

I'll give you an example. But not that other incredibly dense dumbass.

Article

Think its just an off the cuff article? Its not. It actually came up for debate, in fact I watched the debate. The main proponent for this was some crazy Communist Australian chick. The spokesman from America did a very fine job of putting her back in her place, but the point it they wanted to BLATANTLY disregard our Constitution and the Rights it affords us.
In fact, I might even be able to find the video from the debate if I dig around my hard drive if anyone is truly interested.

If that is true, yes I agree, it's fvcked up, I definitely don't share your views on guns, but it's not my place, nor anyone else's but the citizens of the US to decide.

However, I don't exactly trust that article, it's not exactly written in an unbiased or even remotely professional manner, and searching Google for "united nations global ban on guns" yields almost nothing but relatively extremist pages, your link being the first.
The second link however was interesting, I don't know if that's what you're talking about, but it doesn't seem to be quite as bad as what you're trying to imply:
Statement of Philip Alpers, Gun Policy Researcher, United Nations
A few others further down:
"United Nations Attack On Gun Ownership" - www.posse-comitatus.org
"UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL COMMUNISM AGENDA" - www.alpinesurvival.com
"UN Wants Global Gun Ban [Free Republic]" - www.freerepublic.com

Seems like some people are blowing this way out of proportion, especially if what this Philip Alpers says is true:
"As you know, this is far from the truth. You know that this initiative is part of a United Nations initiative which began in Cairo in 1995.
You know that 138 member nations voted unanimously to give this process its mandate."
Which would imply that the US voted for this.
Would in turn makes sense, since it's not actually a "global ban on guns".

The UN is pushing for (and getting) countries to destroy all surplus small arms. The only real market for most of these small arms is for collectors in the US

Australia recently agreed to destroy thousands of L1A1s at UN request rather than sell them for kits to US collectors. Eastern European countries are coming under increased pressure to destroy their stocks of surplus arms (mostly Russian and captured German WWII era firearms) that are waiting out the 5 year delay for the import of Russian owned surplus.


 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
The US does the same thing!

You maroon, thats NOT the same thing! Not even REMOTELY.
Show me where in ANY Constituion for ANY European country abortion is protected. Cant do it can you?
Now show me in OUR Consitution where gun ownership is protected....

See the difference?
Yes I do but in the larger picture the US is trying to force it's moral views on others which is not that much different.


In that regard it is similiar, but also very different. Yes we're trying to forced our views on them, but the issue isnt protected by their Founding Fathers either!! So in the abortion case we want to enforce our views on them, and thats that. In thegun issue, they want to enforce their views on us AND undermine our most basic of rights afforded to us by our very own Constitution. If that were to happen we might as well just scrap the whole damned Constitution and adopt whatever the UN thinks we should.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
The US does the same thing!

You maroon, thats NOT the same thing! Not even REMOTELY.
Show me where in ANY Constituion for ANY European country abortion is protected. Cant do it can you?
Now show me in OUR Consitution where gun ownership is protected....

See the difference?
Yes I do but in the larger picture the US is trying to force it's moral views on others which is not that much different.


In that regard it is similiar, but also very different. Yes we're trying to forced our views on them, but the issue isnt protected by their Founding Fathers either!! So in the abortion case we want to enforce our views on them, and thats that. In thegun issue, they want to enforce their views on us AND undermine our most basic of rights afforded to us by our very own Constitution. If that were to happen we might as well just scrap the whole damned Constitution and adopt whatever the UN thinks we should.

LOL - you are entertaining in a very "I'm A Moron" kind of way

keep it going!!!!!!

 

Sunner

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
11,641
0
76
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
The US does the same thing!

You maroon, thats NOT the same thing! Not even REMOTELY.
Show me where in ANY Constituion for ANY European country abortion is protected. Cant do it can you?
Now show me in OUR Consitution where gun ownership is protected....

See the difference?
Yes I do but in the larger picture the US is trying to force it's moral views on others which is not that much different.


In that regard it is similiar, but also very different. Yes we're trying to forced our views on them, but the issue isnt protected by their Founding Fathers either!! So in the abortion case we want to enforce our views on them, and thats that. In thegun issue, they want to enforce their views on us AND undermine our most basic of rights afforded to us by our very own Constitution. If that were to happen we might as well just scrap the whole damned Constitution and adopt whatever the UN thinks we should.

Most countries don't have "founding fathers".
And I fail to see how it's different, if some Muslim country wanted to ban alcohol across the globe, would that be fine because the specific right to drink alcohol isn't covered by your(or anyone else's) constitution?

Feel free to replace alcohol with just about anything as I just grabbed whatever subject I could think of, and I don't know what the US constitution does and does not specifically protect.

To me it's the same, the UN has no business telling the US how to handle domestic gun laws, and the US has no business telling anyone else how to handle domestic abortion laws.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Why don't you just invade Europe already. Come on!!! Will be a calkwalk like Iraq.

Now why would we want to invade Europe? THere was a reason why the majority of our ancestors left in the first place. We wouldnt want to insult their intelligence by going back.

Just think though. We would rather go into that dump of Iraq before going back to old Europe.


As for the OP. Birth rates will be the decline of the white, christian Europe. In 60 years when white Christians are the minority they will finally figure it out. But the problem is it will be too late. Will America take the last remaining Europeans?


 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
19,954
7,049
136
As if UN would ever have a chance of changing the american gun law..........................
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: Sunner
Most countries don't have "founding fathers".
And I fail to see how it's different, if some Muslim country wanted to ban alcohol across the globe, would that be fine because the specific right to drink alcohol isn't covered by your(or anyone else's) constitution?

Feel free to replace alcohol with just about anything as I just grabbed whatever subject I could think of, and I don't know what the US constitution does and does not specifically protect.

To me it's the same, the UN has no business telling the US how to handle domestic gun laws, and the US has no business telling anyone else how to handle domestic abortion laws.

Neither case is really "right", but on one hand its forcing your views and on the other its rewriting the very fabric of the government. Banning alcohol across the globe does not undermine ANY government. Trying to ban guns in America is in direct contrast to the very document which lays out our Rights and government.
It would be like it America told France it had to adopt a new form of government rather then just pass a law prohibiting some action.
 

imported_Pedro69

Senior member
Jan 18, 2005
259
0
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: Pedro69
Why don't you just invade Europe already. Come on!!! Will be a calkwalk like Iraq.

You guys crack me up. You think to know so much about Europe that you are sure it will sink soon, but most of you never where for a longer term in Europe.

PS: I love it everytime when W comes beggin for help in Iraq and gets that nice smirk from European leaders. Competition sucks, doesn't it.
You seem to have it a bit backwars. It's the European leaders who were expecting Iraq to crash in a fiery disaster so they could rush in and provide salvation, scooping up the financial goodies in the process. Except that hasn't happened so now they are begging the US for a piece of the action there, whining about their lack of access to contracts and jockeying themselves to get an edge. So Bush says, "Sure, you can have a piece of the action. Commit some kind of help is all you need to do. So they refuse and the US throws them a scrawny bone anyway just to kep them tight on their leash and begging for more.

Sad little doggies, they are.

Oh, and I lived in Germany for three years so I'm slightly familiar with Europe. What about you?

Oh let's see..I was born in Germany and I spend the first 26 years of my life in Germany. Thru my business I spend each year at least 3 months in Europe. So what about you?
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: freegeeks
LOL - you are entertaining in a very "I'm A Moron" kind of way

keep it going!!!!!!

Dont feel threaened by my intelligence. I understand you do by the fact you just make snide passing comments and cant really address the issue at hand but really, I'm not a threat to you.
 

dpm

Golden Member
Apr 24, 2002
1,513
0
0
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Sensationalism :) Europe has been around long before the US and it will be quite fine in the coming years.

The United States of America is the oldest democracy (or is it republic?) in the world.

The USA is a (de facto) Republic, rather than a democracy (though the meanings of both words have changed somewhat since they were coined), and is one of, but certainly not the, oldest or the longest lasting examples of either.

However, to forestall any (predictable) responses to this; the US is certainly the oldest, still extant, continuous*, based on an unchanging constitution (1), sovereign, representative democratic (2) country (3) in the world (4)

* not counting secessionist periods and / or changes in territorial makeup
(1) not counting amendments
(2) although not necessarily offering universal suffrage
(3) a country of, by and for a significant proportion, though not necessarily a majority of, the people.
(4) Void where prohibited by law.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: freegeeks
LOL - you are entertaining in a very "I'm A Moron" kind of way

keep it going!!!!!!

Dont feel threaened by my intelligence. I understand you do by the fact you just make snide passing comments and cant really address the issue at hand but really, I'm not a threat to you.

keep them coming!!!!!!!!!
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
If we decide to attack them then they have no chance
If I was a betting man I'd say that Europe could quite handidly defend itself from the US. Remember it was only 50 years ago that Germany brought Europe to its knees. Put all those countries together and it's a great power. Only war could truly unite them though, so as it stands they are just a bunch of individuals. In fact the more friction between the US and European countries, the stronger they will become (my enemy's enemy is my friend). It was only 60 years ago Germany was marching through Paris and now look at those two countries snuggling under the covers!
The United States of America is the oldest democracy (or is it republic?) in the world.
That's great, but the US is a speck on the ass of time compared to other countrys' long reigns of power, from a historical perspective. The US has only been the most powerful country for a number of decades.

Reality is that no country can remain the strongest forever. There is constant change. Power comes and goes. I've actually read statements from Americans who think that the US will be the world's super power indefinitely. Such sillyness.

Specop 007 Europe can stay out of the US' business no more than the US can stay out of Europe's. We live in a connected world with economic and political implications that can't simply be pushed aside. As with any relationship, all sides want something out of it. Europe wants their part and the US wants its. Of course I have some bad things to say about Europe, but it's not like the same things you're saying about them nosing around can't be said exactly about the US as well.
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Look guys, I dunerstand we nose in their business as much as they nose in ours.
The BASIC difference is they do it in complete disregard to our very founding documents and laws!!

As an aside, if we rbought our full military weight to bear we'd stop Euopres ass up one side and right down the other.
The ENTIRETY of Europe. But thats another topic for another thread.
 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
19,954
7,049
136
As long as countries stick to diplomacy I can't see anything wrong with pushing your own agenda.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
As an aside, if we rbought our full military weight to bear we'd stop Euopres ass up one side and right down the other.
The ENTIRETY of Europe. But thats another topic for another thread.
A fantasy thread with unicorns and griffins.
 

Sunner

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
11,641
0
76
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Look guys, I dunerstand we nose in their business as much as they nose in ours.
The BASIC difference is they do it in complete disregard to our very founding documents and laws!!

As an aside, if we rbought our full military weight to bear we'd stop Euopres ass up one side and right down the other.
The ENTIRETY of Europe. But thats another topic for another thread.

The UN "global ban on guns", which doesn't even seem to be anywhere near what you claim it to be, isn't targeting your constitution.
And to me, drinking alcohol, along with many other things that may or may not be controversial in other parts of the world, premarital sex, listening to heavy metal all night, etc etc, are basic freedoms, and just because we don't have constitutional laws that specify that citizens have the right to all of those things doesn't mean they're somehow lesser than your right to bear arms.

Does something have to written in the constitution to be a basic liberty to you?
How about eating junk food(or whatever you prefer)? I'm guessing your constitution doesn't specifically mention it, but would you consider it a lesser issue?

And anyone thinking an all out war between Europe and the US wouldn't be utterly devastating for everyone involved, and probably anyone in the vicinity, is a moron.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Look guys, I dunerstand we nose in their business as much as they nose in ours.
The BASIC difference is they do it in complete disregard to our very founding documents and laws!!

As an aside, if we rbought our full military weight to bear we'd stop Euopres ass up one side and right down the other.
The ENTIRETY of Europe. But thats another topic for another thread.

I see that inbreeding also has an effect on your English skills :D
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: freegeeks
LOL - you are entertaining in a very "I'm A Moron" kind of way

keep it going!!!!!!

Dont feel threaened by my intelligence. I understand you do by the fact you just make snide passing comments and cant really address the issue at hand but really, I'm not a threat to you.
Your intelligence is comprised of weak parroting of extremist commentators.
You admitted this above.
Also, you fail to recognize the word "you're".
Your intelligence seems to be swamped with ignorance and stubbornness.
I am not even going to attempt to reason with your type, as you simply don't.
I can talk to my brick wall anytime i want, i don't need you to fill the void.
 

Sunner

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
11,641
0
76
Originally posted by: biostud
As long as countries stick to diplomacy I can't see anything wrong with pushing your own agenda.

True, if someone tells me I'd look great in a pink dress I'd think he was a moron or just plain weird, or both, but still, he can think that all he wants, so long as he doesn't try to pull anything fishy.
 

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
19,954
7,049
136
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: biostud
As long as countries stick to diplomacy I can't see anything wrong with pushing your own agenda.

True, if someone tells me I'd look great in a pink dress I'd think he was a moron or just plain weird, or both, but still, he can think that all he wants, so long as he doesn't try to pull anything fishy.


:camera:'s ?
 

imported_Pedro69

Senior member
Jan 18, 2005
259
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Why don't you just invade Europe already. Come on!!! Will be a calkwalk like Iraq.

Now why would we want to invade Europe? THere was a reason why the majority of our ancestors left in the first place. We wouldnt want to insult their intelligence by going back.

Just think though. We would rather go into that dump of Iraq before going back to old Europe.


As for the OP. Birth rates will be the decline of the white, christian Europe. In 60 years when white Christians are the minority they will finally figure it out. But the problem is it will be too late. Will America take the last remaining Europeans?

Oh NOOO white Christians will be the minority in Europe!! And who cares? I don't.

Why are you so obsesed with skin color and religion? Are you afraid some Muslim or Frenchman will steal your candy?
 

Stunt

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,717
2
0
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Look guys, I dunerstand we nose in their business as much as they nose in ours.
The BASIC difference is they do it in complete disregard to our very founding documents and laws!!

As an aside, if we rbought our full military weight to bear we'd stop Euopres ass up one side and right down the other.
The ENTIRETY of Europe. But thats another topic for another thread.
That statement is contradictory to what you said above...
quit flip-flopping.
sandorski pointed this out already, good job pointing out his intelligence, and your lack of...
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Look guys, I dunerstand we nose in their business as much as they nose in ours.
The BASIC difference is they do it in complete disregard to our very founding documents and laws!!

As an aside, if we rbought our full military weight to bear we'd stop Euopres ass up one side and right down the other.
The ENTIRETY of Europe. But thats another topic for another thread.

I see that inbreeding also has an effect on your English skills :D

Holy Jeebus.... :Q
LOL!! Yeah, I hate this early morning stuff......
 

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
Originally posted by: Stunt
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Look guys, I dunerstand we nose in their business as much as they nose in ours.
The BASIC difference is they do it in complete disregard to our very founding documents and laws!!

As an aside, if we rbought our full military weight to bear we'd stop Euopres ass up one side and right down the other.
The ENTIRETY of Europe. But thats another topic for another thread.
That statement is contradictory to what you said above...
quit flip-flopping.
sandorski pointed this out already, good job pointing out his intelligence, and your lack of...

What did I say above?? :confused: