Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: sandorski
Ok, I see. Troll away then. :roll:
Oh damn your dumb. I take it you have literacy problems of some type? I mean, I *clearly* stated "Read my previous post" and you obviously couldnt do it.
Deny it all you want, the EU (Or more directly the UN) DOES want to undermine our Constitution.
He asked for examples, didn't he? I haven't seen any.
I'll give you an example. But not that other incredibly dense dumbass.
Article
Think its just an off the cuff article? Its not. It actually came up for debate, in fact I watched the debate. The main proponent for this was some crazy Communist Australian chick. The spokesman from America did a very fine job of putting her back in her place, but the point it they wanted to BLATANTLY disregard our Constitution and the Rights it affords us.
In fact, I might even be able to find the video from the debate if I dig around my hard drive if anyone is truly interested.
If that is true, yes I agree, it's fvcked up, I definitely don't share your views on guns, but it's not my place, nor anyone else's but the citizens of the US to decide.
However, I don't exactly trust that article, it's not exactly written in an unbiased or even remotely professional manner, and searching Google for "united nations global ban on guns" yields almost nothing but relatively extremist pages, your link being the first.
The second link however was interesting, I don't know if that's what you're talking about, but it doesn't seem to be quite as bad as what you're trying to imply:
Statement of Philip Alpers, Gun Policy Researcher, United Nations
A few others further down:
"United Nations Attack On Gun Ownership" -
www.posse-comitatus.org
"UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL COMMUNISM AGENDA" -
www.alpinesurvival.com
"UN Wants Global Gun Ban [Free Republic]" -
www.freerepublic.com
Seems like some people are blowing this way out of proportion, especially if what this Philip Alpers says is true:
"As you know, this is far from the truth. You know that this initiative is part of a United Nations initiative which began in Cairo in 1995.
You know that 138 member nations voted unanimously to give this process its mandate."
Which would imply that the US voted for this.
Would in turn makes sense, since it's not actually a "global ban on guns".