- Dec 18, 2001
- 24,036
- 21
- 81
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: PG
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: Quixfire
The big problem with ethanol is it's a sugar based. When burning it for a long period of time it will carbonize your engine. Methanol is a better solution if it wasn't so poisonous.
you can't use methanol. energy is produced by breaking carbon-carbon bonds. methanol contains only one carbon atom (and 4 hydrogens, i.e. CH4) which is unlinked to any other carbons. you can't stick this into anything and expect combustion.
WTF? Please tell me you are joking.
If not, well.. I have no further comment.
Man, this sure will come as news to all the methanol burning go-karters out there..........
And the race car crews that burn methanol, such as all cars at the Indy 500 since 1964.
http://www.innerauto.com/innerauto/text/fact17.html
hmm, well i stand corrected. i know nothing about cars, but in my metabolics classes my profs would always make connections between metabolism in animals and combustion engines. in biological organisms energy is produced from breaking C-C bonds. i figured the same was true w/ engines.
doh.
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: PG
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: Quixfire
The big problem with ethanol is it's a sugar based. When burning it for a long period of time it will carbonize your engine. Methanol is a better solution if it wasn't so poisonous.
you can't use methanol. energy is produced by breaking carbon-carbon bonds. methanol contains only one carbon atom (and 4 hydrogens, i.e. CH4) which is unlinked to any other carbons. you can't stick this into anything and expect combustion.
WTF? Please tell me you are joking.
If not, well.. I have no further comment.
Man, this sure will come as news to all the methanol burning go-karters out there..........
And the race car crews that burn methanol, such as all cars at the Indy 500 since 1964.
http://www.innerauto.com/innerauto/text/fact17.html
hmm, well i stand corrected. i know nothing about cars, but in my metabolics classes my profs would always make connections between metabolism in animals and combustion engines. in biological organisms energy is produced from breaking C-C bonds. i figured the same was true w/ engines.
doh.
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: PG
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: Quixfire
The big problem with ethanol is it's a sugar based. When burning it for a long period of time it will carbonize your engine. Methanol is a better solution if it wasn't so poisonous.
you can't use methanol. energy is produced by breaking carbon-carbon bonds. methanol contains only one carbon atom (and 4 hydrogens, i.e. CH4) which is unlinked to any other carbons. you can't stick this into anything and expect combustion.
WTF? Please tell me you are joking.
If not, well.. I have no further comment.
Man, this sure will come as news to all the methanol burning go-karters out there..........
And the race car crews that burn methanol, such as all cars at the Indy 500 since 1964.
http://www.innerauto.com/innerauto/text/fact17.html
hmm, well i stand corrected. i know nothing about cars, but in my metabolics classes my profs would always make connections between metabolism in animals and combustion engines. in biological organisms energy is produced from breaking C-C bonds. i figured the same was true w/ engines.
doh.
No biggie.Isn't chemistry awesome? Did you know that Diesel contains hundreds of varying carbon-chain molecules, the longer chains have more energy potential but burn slow, and the smaller chains burn faster but with much less heat/force output. Diesel engines are more efficient than gasoline engines only because the extremely high 22:1 compression ratio (or higher) creates a heat capable of combusting the higher chain molecules - but even then there is a lot of potential energy lost, otherwise there would be so much black exhaust. The gasoline is much more refined, but still contains varying degrees of carbon chain molecules. However, since combustion takes place within a colder chamber and must be spark ignited, many of the heavy compounds don't ignite, and by the time much of the fuel has been turned into heat and exhaust, the chamber has expanded and the mixture is cooled.
I think a disel design applied to an ethanol engine would be awesome. Plus, ethanol being nearly a single compound, would ensure to burn more completely. The trick now to increase efficiency of the engine is to reduce the need of radiating excess heat.
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: etech
Ethanol For Fuel Fundamentally Uneconomic, Study Says
"Neither increases in government subsidies to corn-based ethanol fuel nor hikes in the price of petroleum can overcome what one Cornell University agricultural scientist calls a fundamental input-yield problem: It takes more energy to make ethanol from grain than the combustion of ethanol produces.
At a time when ethanol-gasoline mixtures (gasohol) are touted as the American answer to fossil fuel shortages by corn producers, food processors and some lawmakers, Cornell's David Pimentel takes a longer range view.
"Abusing our precious croplands to grow corn for an energy-inefficient process that yields low-grade automobile fuel amounts to unsustainable, subsidized food burning," says the Cornell professor in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
..."
I don't think it is a good idea. The reasons are in the article.
That article is flawed, you can use the unused corn stalks for ethanol product. And that article talks about "extracting" ethanol from grain, which is silly. You can produce ethanol using micro-organisms from plant matter that doesn't necessarily contain any ethanol.
It is certainly possible, and there should be little doubt that alcohol is a superiod fuel to gasoline.
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: etech
Ethanol For Fuel Fundamentally Uneconomic, Study Says
"Neither increases in government subsidies to corn-based ethanol fuel nor hikes in the price of petroleum can overcome what one Cornell University agricultural scientist calls a fundamental input-yield problem: It takes more energy to make ethanol from grain than the combustion of ethanol produces.
At a time when ethanol-gasoline mixtures (gasohol) are touted as the American answer to fossil fuel shortages by corn producers, food processors and some lawmakers, Cornell's David Pimentel takes a longer range view.
"Abusing our precious croplands to grow corn for an energy-inefficient process that yields low-grade automobile fuel amounts to unsustainable, subsidized food burning," says the Cornell professor in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
..."
I don't think it is a good idea. The reasons are in the article.
That article is flawed, you can use the unused corn stalks for ethanol product. And that article talks about "extracting" ethanol from grain, which is silly. You can produce ethanol using micro-organisms from plant matter that doesn't necessarily contain any ethanol.
Just one comment about using the stalks. If you use the stalks, you're not letting them return to the soil, which means you need a lot more fertilizers to offset the loss.
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: etech
Ethanol For Fuel Fundamentally Uneconomic, Study Says
"Neither increases in government subsidies to corn-based ethanol fuel nor hikes in the price of petroleum can overcome what one Cornell University agricultural scientist calls a fundamental input-yield problem: It takes more energy to make ethanol from grain than the combustion of ethanol produces.
At a time when ethanol-gasoline mixtures (gasohol) are touted as the American answer to fossil fuel shortages by corn producers, food processors and some lawmakers, Cornell's David Pimentel takes a longer range view.
"Abusing our precious croplands to grow corn for an energy-inefficient process that yields low-grade automobile fuel amounts to unsustainable, subsidized food burning," says the Cornell professor in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
..."
I don't think it is a good idea. The reasons are in the article.
That article is flawed, you can use the unused corn stalks for ethanol product. And that article talks about "extracting" ethanol from grain, which is silly. You can produce ethanol using micro-organisms from plant matter that doesn't necessarily contain any ethanol.
Just one comment about using the stalks. If you use the stalks, you're not letting them return to the soil, which means you need a lot more fertilizers to offset the loss.
Originally posted by: Fausto1
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: PG
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: Quixfire
The big problem with ethanol is it's a sugar based. When burning it for a long period of time it will carbonize your engine. Methanol is a better solution if it wasn't so poisonous.
you can't use methanol. energy is produced by breaking carbon-carbon bonds. methanol contains only one carbon atom (and 4 hydrogens, i.e. CH4) which is unlinked to any other carbons. you can't stick this into anything and expect combustion.
WTF? Please tell me you are joking.
If not, well.. I have no further comment.
Man, this sure will come as news to all the methanol burning go-karters out there..........
And the race car crews that burn methanol, such as all cars at the Indy 500 since 1964.
http://www.innerauto.com/innerauto/text/fact17.html
hmm, well i stand corrected. i know nothing about cars, but in my metabolics classes my profs would always make connections between metabolism in animals and combustion engines. in biological organisms energy is produced from breaking C-C bonds. i figured the same was true w/ engines.
doh.
You release energy any time you break any kind of molecular bond. The high-E bond in methanol is the double bond between the Carbon and the Oxygen. Any time you move, you're utilizing energy from the phosphate bonds in ATP.
But where do you get the fertilizers?... It's all one big cycle. Once you're done using the stalks, maybe they can be composted as a fertilizer. The cool part about ethanol is that it's exhaust is basically carbon dioxide and water vapor, which is taken back by plantlife anyway. The energy of ethanol came from the Sun, everything else is just a carrier. So is the case for gasoline/oil, however, it took hundreds of years of vegetation and thousands of years of compression - plus all those nutrients used in the process are useless now - I would have to say ethanol production is by far more efficient
That's too general of a statement and it isn't really true. Air is run through the engine so you end up with oxides of Nitrogen, etc. which are pollutants and there's always some Carbon that will not combust fully so there's some CO instead of CO2.The cool part about ethanol is that it's exhaust is basically carbon dioxide and water vapor, which is taken back by plantlife anyway.
Get an old, simple motorcycle and learn to work on it. Elbow-deep is a good way to learn a lot quickly about engines.Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: Fausto1
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: PG
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: theNEOone
Originally posted by: Quixfire
The big problem with ethanol is it's a sugar based. When burning it for a long period of time it will carbonize your engine. Methanol is a better solution if it wasn't so poisonous.
you can't use methanol. energy is produced by breaking carbon-carbon bonds. methanol contains only one carbon atom (and 4 hydrogens, i.e. CH4) which is unlinked to any other carbons. you can't stick this into anything and expect combustion.
WTF? Please tell me you are joking.
If not, well.. I have no further comment.
Man, this sure will come as news to all the methanol burning go-karters out there..........
And the race car crews that burn methanol, such as all cars at the Indy 500 since 1964.
http://www.innerauto.com/innerauto/text/fact17.html
hmm, well i stand corrected. i know nothing about cars, but in my metabolics classes my profs would always make connections between metabolism in animals and combustion engines. in biological organisms energy is produced from breaking C-C bonds. i figured the same was true w/ engines.
doh.
You release energy any time you break any kind of molecular bond. The high-E bond in methanol is the double bond between the Carbon and the Oxygen. Any time you move, you're utilizing energy from the phosphate bonds in ATP.
that is true, but the mechanism in our bodies uses the energy from breaking C-C bonds specifically, not C-O. because my prof always made parallels between the 2 systems it seemed natural to think that the same was true of engines.
i know nothing about cars, but i'd really like to learn. i hate being ignorant, especially with something as common as engine mechanics. not to say that learning about engines is easy, but we do interact w/ cars and such on a daily basis.
grrrrrrrrr. :|
Originally posted by: Roger
It is certainly possible, and there should be little doubt that alcohol is a superiod fuel to gasoline.
No it is not, alcohol as a fuel has a much lower BTU rating, therefor you must burn more fuel per mile than gasoline.
The facts
Originally posted by: Roger
It is certainly possible, and there should be little doubt that alcohol is a superiod fuel to gasoline.
No it is not, alcohol as a fuel has a much lower BTU rating, therefor you must burn more fuel per mile than gasoline.
The facts
Just because it has a lower BTU rating doesen't mean that it is a poor fuel
Originally posted by: Roger
Just because it has a lower BTU rating doesen't mean that it is a poor fuel
I did not say it was a poor fuel, I was only pointing out that it was not a Superior fuel gasoline.![]()
Originally posted by: Fausto1
You release energy any time you break any kind of molecular bond. The high-E bond in methanol is the double bond between the Carbon and the Oxygen. Any time you move, you're utilizing energy from the phosphate bonds in ATP.
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: etech
Ethanol For Fuel Fundamentally Uneconomic, Study Says
"Neither increases in government subsidies to corn-based ethanol fuel nor hikes in the price of petroleum can overcome what one Cornell University agricultural scientist calls a fundamental input-yield problem: It takes more energy to make ethanol from grain than the combustion of ethanol produces.
At a time when ethanol-gasoline mixtures (gasohol) are touted as the American answer to fossil fuel shortages by corn producers, food processors and some lawmakers, Cornell's David Pimentel takes a longer range view.
"Abusing our precious croplands to grow corn for an energy-inefficient process that yields low-grade automobile fuel amounts to unsustainable, subsidized food burning," says the Cornell professor in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.
..."
I don't think it is a good idea. The reasons are in the article.
That article is flawed, you can use the unused corn stalks for ethanol product. And that article talks about "extracting" ethanol from grain, which is silly. You can produce ethanol using micro-organisms from plant matter that doesn't necessarily contain any ethanol.
Just one comment about using the stalks. If you use the stalks, you're not letting them return to the soil, which means you need a lot more fertilizers to offset the loss.
First, the bolded.. You really should know something about what you're talking about before you speak. No plant that I know of actually contains alcohol, lol..
Yeast convert simple sugars into alcohol. That's the traditional way of making it.
Now, as for the fertilizer comment.. that's probably true, but there are certainly other ways of enriching the soil without using chemical fertilizers.
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: Roger
Just because it has a lower BTU rating doesen't mean that it is a poor fuel
I did not say it was a poor fuel, I was only pointing out that it was not a Superior fuel gasoline.![]()
I guess it depends on your fuel criteria... lol.
I consider ethanol to be superior to gasoline because it's pure, non-carcinogenic, has a high octane rating, and can be made from renewable resources...
Originally posted by: SagaLore
I guess fermentation requires micro-organisms too.![]()
