- Jun 23, 2001
- 27,730
- 8
- 0
http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/05/motorola-xoom-2-review/
Uh, 620? Steep pricing.
I find it interesting that those angled corners were an aspect that every here ranted on when the first pictures surfaced, and they're something the Xoom 2 gets praised for.
Still, with that 600 dollar price tag, it seems like Motorola didn't learn from the Number 1 thing that crippled the original.
Is £396 ($620) now too much to pay for a 16GB Android tablet that's merely dual-core? We'll be sure to try and answer all these right after the break.
Uh, 620? Steep pricing.
The Xoom 2 is a stylish successor to the original Honeycomb tablet. The build quality is much improved, and Motorola is on the right track with those oddly shaped corners and built-in IR emitter. There has been an explosion in Honeycomb tablets since the first Xoom launched, and while the sequel does plenty right, it isn't enough to claim the head seat at the Android tablet family table. Fortunately, the Xoom 2 has bypassed Moto's tendency to over-tinker with the core Android experience on its phones, resulting in a pretty reliable tablet, although it still behaved erratically with video content.
While camera shortcomings on a tablet may not be a massive deal-breaker, lack of tap to focus and poor auto-focus on the video camera are frustrating. Because of a lack of expandable storage (and beefier models), users will be drawn into the world of cloud media management, whether they want to or not. It's telling that the Google Music app comes preinstalled on this UK review model -- somewhere the beta isn't yet available. While the Xoom was -- for a time -- the best Honeycomb tablet, it was also the only Honeycomb tablet. But competition's a lot tougher, and while Motorola's upped its game, it's not by enough to come out on top.
I find it interesting that those angled corners were an aspect that every here ranted on when the first pictures surfaced, and they're something the Xoom 2 gets praised for.
Still, with that 600 dollar price tag, it seems like Motorola didn't learn from the Number 1 thing that crippled the original.