Elton John says religion promotes homophobia

Sureshot324

Diamond Member
Feb 4, 2003
3,370
0
71
LONDON ? Organized religion fuels anti-gay discrimination and other forms of bias, pop star Elton John said in an interview published Saturday.

?I think religion has always tried to turn hatred towards gay people,? John said in the Observer newspaper's Music Monthly Magazine. ?Religion promotes the hatred and spite against gays.?

?But there are so many people I know who are gay and love their religion,? he said. ?From my point of view, I would ban religion completely. Organized religion doesn't seem to work. It turns people into really hateful lemmings and it's not really compassionate.?

Religious leaders have also failed to do anything about tensions and conflicts around the world, he said.

?Why aren't they having a conclave? Why aren't they coming together?? he asked.

John said those in his own field have been similarly lax.

?It's like the peace movement in the '60s. Musicians got through to people by getting out there and doing peace concerts, but we don't seem to do them any more,? he said. ?If John Lennon were alive today, he'd be leading it with a vengeance.?

Wow. That's a pretty huge generalization, but I can't say I disagree entirely. Many religious people are resistant to social change because they feel like they would be betraying their religion.
 

mrSHEiK124

Lifer
Mar 6, 2004
11,488
2
0
If he thinks he can freely say religion should be banned entirely, how is that any different from homophobes who want to eliminate homosexuality? Fvcking hypocrite...
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Gays are an easy target. It isn't cool to hate on Jewish people any more. Get this - it was actually the Catholic Church who initiated the tradition of forcing all Jewish people in a village to wear yellow stars. After WWII they couldn't get way with their Jew hatred any more.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
I'm not the most religious person in the world, but you can't simply ban religion, people will believe what they wish. 'Banning' it will only force it under ground, nothing more.

Secondly, many charitable groups are religious based, so they are responsible for a lot of good in the world.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
If he thinks he can freely say religion should be banned entirely, how is that any different from homophobes who want to eliminate homosexuality? Fvcking hypocrite...

:thumbsup: Exactly
 

eflat

Platinum Member
Feb 27, 2000
2,109
0
0
The cause of 90% + of all wars: You guessed it.

And thou shalt (not) kill
 
Nov 3, 2004
10,491
22
81
Originally posted by: CitizenDoug
The cause of 90% + of all wars: You guessed it.

And thou shalt (not) kill


really? vietnam, iraq, iraq ii, wwi, wwii, civil war, korean war, falkland islands, mexican war, revolutionary war, war of 1812, 100 years war, ...
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
If he thinks he can freely say religion should be banned entirely, how is that any different from homophobes who want to eliminate homosexuality? Fvcking hypocrite...

banning organized religion is like banning the nuclear bomb - it benefits everyone.

whereas criminalizing homosexuality doesn't benefit anyone.


edit: it is idiotic to think Elton John actually wants all religion to be banned. it is quite obvious that his comments are an expression of his frustration at the perverted, corrupting influence that christianity has on the lives of its adherents and the harmful effects christianity has on the lives of lesbians and gays. People tend to make exaggerated, extreme statements when they are frustrated. I am 100% certain that if you were to ask him if he SERIOUSLY thinks it would be a good idea, or even feasible, to completely ban religion, on reflection he would say no.
 
S

SlitheryDee

I know lot's of really good people who consider themselves Christians.

Most of them are also terribly intolerant of things that fall outside of their concept of how things "should be". I can manage to be around them without incident because I avoid politics in conversation and I never EVER talk religion with them. To most of them my silence is the same as approval and that allows me to be fit neatly somewhere their world view.

I often wonder what they'd say if I told them that I am an agnostic who couldn't care less what the gay population did. I somehow think that these "good" people wouldn't be so nice to me anymore...
 
Nov 3, 2004
10,491
22
81
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
If he thinks he can freely say religion should be banned entirely, how is that any different from homophobes who want to eliminate homosexuality? Fvcking hypocrite...

banning organized religion is like banning the nuclear bomb - it benefits everyone.

whereas criminalizing homosexuality doesn't benefit anyone.


banning homosexuality would allow us to lock up an idiot like you.

---

And banning you would allow us to be rid of one more bigot.

Lighten up, or go elsewhere. If you cannot manage the first option, we can enforce the second one.

AnandTech Moderator
 

mrSHEiK124

Lifer
Mar 6, 2004
11,488
2
0
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
If he thinks he can freely say religion should be banned entirely, how is that any different from homophobes who want to eliminate homosexuality? Fvcking hypocrite...

banning organized religion is like banning the nuclear bomb - it benefits everyone.

whereas criminalizing homosexuality doesn't benefit anyone.

Sorry to tell you buddy, you're just as big of a hypocrite as Sir Elton John here. The right to follow a religion, and the right to be homosexual, are both choices anyone is free to make. The difference between you and I is that I have absolutely no problem with you being gay, although I might not agree with it, I'm not going to try and stop you. You on the other hand, seem to have a big problem with religion. Well, you can bite me for all I care, because you're a hypocrite and have the reasoning of a homophobic 5 year old.
</rant>
 

Midlander

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 2002
2,456
1
0
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Gays are an easy target. It isn't cool to hate on Jewish people any more. Get this - it was actually the Catholic Church who initiated the tradition of forcing all Jewish people in a village to wear yellow stars. After WWII they couldn't get way with their Jew hatred any more.

Where do you get this stuff? I'm not saying the Catholic Church was blameless, but they didn't come up with the idea, either.

Yellow Star
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,860
6,396
126
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
If he thinks he can freely say religion should be banned entirely, how is that any different from homophobes who want to eliminate homosexuality? Fvcking hypocrite...

Not really:

Religion--Point of view, Philosophy
Homosexual---Human Being

Not that I agree with banning Religion, but I agree that it holds back progress in many cases.
 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,666
21
81
I think he has a point. The only problem is how to get people to stay spiritual when there is no organized religion.

Though It may just be that Religion is a perfect escape goat on how the human race is so hateful and primitive.
 

Ronstang

Lifer
Jul 8, 2000
12,493
18
81
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
If he thinks he can freely say religion should be banned entirely, how is that any different from homophobes who want to eliminate homosexuality? Fvcking hypocrite...

:thumbsup: Exactly

Pretty much what I was thinking. I say we abolish BOTH. That would solve the issue.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: Midlander
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Gays are an easy target. It isn't cool to hate on Jewish people any more. Get this - it was actually the Catholic Church who initiated the tradition of forcing all Jewish people in a village to wear yellow stars. After WWII they couldn't get way with their Jew hatred any more.

Where do you get this stuff? I'm not saying the Catholic Church was blameless, but they didn't come up with the idea, either.

Yellow Star

who is Abbassid caliph Haroun al-Raschid?

doesn't your link confirm that the first time this occurred on a major scale (or at least, the first time that we know of, that is well documented) was on account of catholic church policy in Europe in the middle ages..?
 

mrSHEiK124

Lifer
Mar 6, 2004
11,488
2
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
If he thinks he can freely say religion should be banned entirely, how is that any different from homophobes who want to eliminate homosexuality? Fvcking hypocrite...

Not really:

Religion--Point of view, Philosophy
Homosexual---Human Being

Not that I agree with banning Religion, but I agree that it holds back progress in many cases.

Uh, no; the proper comparison is as follows:

Religion: Point of view, philosophy
Homosexuality: Point of view, sexual orientation

You have to compare apples to apples, not to oranges. If you wanted to say Homosexual, you'd have to use.....Religious Person.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
If he thinks he can freely say religion should be banned entirely, how is that any different from homophobes who want to eliminate homosexuality? Fvcking hypocrite...

banning organized religion is like banning the nuclear bomb - it benefits everyone.

whereas criminalizing homosexuality doesn't benefit anyone.

Sorry to tell you buddy, you're just as big of a hypocrite as Sir Elton John here. The right to follow a religion, and the right to be homosexual, are both choices anyone is free to make. The difference between you and I is that I have absolutely no problem with you being gay, although I might not agree with it, I'm not going to try and stop you. You on the other hand, seem to have a big problem with religion. Well, you can bite me for all I care, because you're a hypocrite and have the reasoning of a homophobic 5 year old.
</rant>

blah blah blah

it is idiotic to think Elton John actually wants all religion to be banned. it is quite obvious that his comments are an expression of his frustration at the perverted, corrupting influence that christianity has on the lives of its adherents and the harmful effects christianity has on the lives of lesbians and gays. People tend to make exaggerated, extreme statements when they are frustrated. But I am 100% certain that if you were to ask him if he SERIOUSLY thinks it would be a good idea, or even feasible, to completely ban religion, on reflection he would say no it is not a good idea.

 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
If he thinks he can freely say religion should be banned entirely, how is that any different from homophobes who want to eliminate homosexuality? Fvcking hypocrite...

banning organized religion is like banning the nuclear bomb - it benefits everyone.

whereas criminalizing homosexuality doesn't benefit anyone.


banning homosexuality would allow us to lock up an idiot like you.

ibCriesOfPrejudice :p

- M4H
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
who gives a shite what elton john thinks? I mean really... he is elton john!!!

I'm always interested to hear what he has to say. He's grown into the role of elder statesman of the gay community, and he is representative of a certain (older) generation of gay men. I'm much more interested in his opinion than say the opinion of some kook like the Pope.