My take is:
1. I don't support para-social relationships with public figures; I don't own a Tesla or Tesla stock. I have no investment outside of idle forum discussion. I
do think the cars are pretty cool & I like to follow self-driving technology!
2. What Elon chooses to do & how he chooses to represent himself is 100% up to him. I take a lot of business, marketing, and advertising courses as part of my ongoing professional education & his behavior constantly comes up in case studies, so much of my interest is in studying how leadership affects companies. From what I've learned over the years, I don't think you can be involved in politics &
not be corrupt because of the way the system is structured. The most recent example of the Verizon vs. Starlink FAA contract is a prime example of that.
From a business & PR perspective, Elon
could fix his public reputation overnight, should he choose to do so. Would that change who he is or his behavior? No. Would it change your perception of him? Also no, because you know how he
really acts. He has a history of broken promises when it comes to specs & timelines and poor behavior when it comes to how he treats people & business partners (ex. Twitter advertisers). And Tesla itself isn't just overvalued, it's
insanely overvalued.
3. I view the products separately. When you put something out into the world, it gets absorbed by the culture. How each individual chooses to view & support those products is a personal choice. A recent example is JK Rowling's public behavior vs. the Harry Potter franchise: some people choose to separate the product from the creator & continue to enjoy the it (HBO is even releasing a new Harry Potter TV show next year!), while others went as far as choosing to get their tattoos removed because they didn't want to be associated with her.
I 100% understand why people would not want to be associated with the Tesla brand as a result of Elon Musk's behavior. However, as a second discussion point, I also find it largely hypocritical when people
only boycott what they see in the current news cycle without doing
any further research into other companies that behave poorly as well & then applying an equal amount of protesting as well. For those who chose to boycott Chick-fil-A,
why are they choosing to conveniently ignore the other 243 companies with similar issues?
Again, it's up to each person to decide how they want to view public personas & what they choose to support after that. I've seen people who were strongly opposed to either Biden or Trump who didn't leave the country, despite not wanting to be branded "Americans" anymore, yet they wanted to continue to enjoy all of the benefits of living here, despite a disagreement in leadership & representation.
As far as domestic vehicles go? Ford Motor Company just agreed to pay the United States
$365 million to resolve "allegations" that it violated the Tariff Act of 1930. VW's DieselGate debacle has cost them
over $33 billion worldwide so far & contributed to wrecking the environment further. The world is a mess & will always
be a mess.
Shein is awful.
Amazon is a union-busting, trillion-dollar company that violates workers rights. The majority of chocolate is made with
slave labor.
There's a LOT of corruption in the world; thanks to the Internet, more & more of it is getting exposed to the public. I think personal views & what people choose to support is up to them. It can be difficult to have
truly ethical consumption in
any domain under capitalism, whether it's the car you drive, the food you eat, or the clothes you wear. People judge other people for driving a Tesla, but then turn a blind eye to
Fiat Chrysler,
Mitsubishi,
Subaru,
Nissan, and literally
every other brand of car who lie, cheat, steal, and damage the environment.