• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

elfenix fail at math

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
This doesn't belong in that article:
In February 2009, consumers won't have much choice. That's when the Federal Communications Commission has mandated that all analog broadcasts cease.
 
Originally posted by: mugs
This doesn't belong in that article:
In February 2009, consumers won't have much choice. That's when the Federal Communications Commission has mandated that all analog broadcasts cease.

the whole article is stupid, from top to bottom

'who the hell is gonna buy a $70,000 tv?!?'

'you'd better start saving!'

'we're all going to have to buy plasma tvs in 2009!'

i mean, who is going to buy a maybach?
 
If I wanted that large of screen, I would just buy a projector. For even half of what you'd spend on that plasma, you could have one of the nicest 1080 projectors on the market.
 
Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: DanFungus
you are wrong

you are wrong

A 103" 16:9 TV is 89.8"x50.5". Shaq is approx 85" tall. Close enough.

This isn't a proof.

Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
EDIT: (I should know)

http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/tfinch2/IM000459.JPG

I view 4:3 DirecTV content on it too. 😛

Nemo ftw 😛

When I took that pic I was using a sucky digicam. Any of the Pixar movies are a great way to show off your display though. :thumbsup:
 
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
Originally posted by: DanFungus
you are wrong

you are wrong

A 103" 16:9 TV is 89.8"x50.5". Shaq is approx 85" tall. Close enough.

This isn't a proof.

Originally posted by: YOyoYOhowsDAjello
EDIT: (I should know)

http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/tfinch2/IM000459.JPG

I view 4:3 DirecTV content on it too. 😛

Nemo ftw 😛

When I took that pic I was using a sucky digicam. Any of the Pixar movies are a great way to show off your display though. :thumbsup:

Yeah, I should take some shots of the Incredibles sometime.

But getting back to the thread, they could have said Yao Ming or something and gotten the width just about right. (or someone who is the right height exactly... I don't do the whole "sports" thing)
 
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
It may be the same size of Shaq, but it's smarter.

More self-ownage in this thread? Shaq already has an BS and an MBA, and said he would start working on his PhD in Criminology in 2006.
 
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
It may be the same size of Shaq, but it's smarter.

More self-ownage in this thread? Shaq already has an BS and an MBA, and said he would start working on his PhD in Criminology in 2006.

i thought he had a BA in 'general studies' from louisiana state 'university'
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: tfinch2
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
It may be the same size of Shaq, but it's smarter.

More self-ownage in this thread? Shaq already has an BS and an MBA, and said he would start working on his PhD in Criminology in 2006.

i thought he had a BA in 'general studies' from louisiana state 'university'

WTF is up with the need to be disparaging about LSU in putting university in quotes??
LSU is as real as a university as any other state school out there.

Furthermore I think it is completely outstanding that you have a major sports figure who really believes in the benefit of an education. That entire "role model" thing going on.
 
Back
Top