Don't assume for a second that the value of the stock is based on anything but the group mentality of a stupid, irrational, greedy mass of people looking for their own selfish gain. Even though AMD CPU's are better than Intel CPU's in every conceivable category, and have been proven as such by every objective industry observer, that means nothing to the millions of investors looking for that next quick turn-around.
Another big problem is the idiotic corporate mentality: "No one ever got fired for buying Intel." In other words, if you recommend Intel and something goes wrong, it's blamed on software or hardware other than Intel, but if you recommend AMD and something goes wrong, it's blamed on you and AMD. Of course, AMD platforms are exactly as stable as Intel platforms and no one has ever shown otherwise, but this means nothing to mindless middle-management types who would rather waste money and contribute to a near-monopoly than give an underdog a chance and promote competition while achieving a better value for their slimy corporate dollar.
And worst of all are the evil, slick salesmen in Best Buy and Future Shop that steer you towards the latest overpriced Intel garbage and tow the party line of "a better Internet experience". To the first-time buyers wandering the glittering isles of the mega-stores, armed with only the cruel misinformation of corrupt supermarket rags like PC Magazine, urging them to actually consider a name brand computer system from Dell or HP or Compaq as possibly serving some valuable purpose in this universe, for which of course they should be shot and their brains sold as bulk cattle feed.
What was I saying?
Modus