• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ebay scammer on Judge Judy

"A fool and his money are soon parted"

I hate scammers, but I also don't really feel sorry for people that fall for these scams.
 
Originally posted by: MisterJackson
Check out the chick @ 3:16-3:18 on the right hand side of the mother in the background.

Good gawd.
Click to expand...

There's at least 4 hot chicks in that courtroom.
 
Jugement for $5000.00 for the plaintif!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!EXCELLENT!!!

Had I been there it would have been dificult for me not to jump over to the blond lady's side and PUNCH HER IN THE fucking MOUTH.

Despicable conduct I know but ho so satisfying.

 
Originally posted by: OVerLoRDI
I love the end... "Judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of 5000 dollars." OWNED so hard.
Click to expand...

This was discussed in the last (few) threads about this video. The way those shows work is the show puts up a "prize fund" out of which the judgment is paid. The rest is split between the plaintiff and the defendant. So if she was awarded $500 out of a $5000 prize fund, then she'd really get $2750 and the defendant would get $2250.

Judge Judy awarded $5000 so the defendant wouldn't get any money.
 
I have a question. Just how enforcable are these rulings?

If you are ruled $5000 against you, when do you have to pay by? What if you don't pay them? What kind of REAL negative impact does it bear on the person? Does it go on their credit rating? Do they get a warrant issued to them?
 
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
I have a question. Just how enforcable are these rulings?

If you are ruled $5000 against you, when do you have to pay by? What if you don't pay them? What kind of REAL negative impact does it bear on the person? Does it go on their credit rating? Do they get a warrant issued to them?
Click to expand...
See Mugs' post.

Although, my recollection was a bit different than what Mugs posted. I thought the total pot was $10k, not $5k (each side would get $5k +- the judgement amount). For example, the plantiff would get $5k + the $5k judgement = $10k, the defendant would get $5k-$5k judgement = $0. Although, I could be wrong as it has been years since I watched those shows.

Either way, it doesn't matter. The person with the money ruled against him/her never pays a penny. Instead, he/she just gets less money for doing the show. There is no deadline, no "not paying", no real negative impact on the person, no credit report, no warrant, etc.
 
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
I have a question. Just how enforcable are these rulings?

If you are ruled $5000 against you, when do you have to pay by? What if you don't pay them? What kind of REAL negative impact does it bear on the person? Does it go on their credit rating? Do they get a warrant issued to them?
Click to expand...
See Mugs' post.

Although, my recollection was a bit different than what Mugs posted. I thought the total pot was $10k, not $5k (each side would get $5k +- the judgement amount). For example, the plantiff would get $5k + the $5k judgement = $10k, the defendant would get $5k-$5k judgement = $0. Although, I could be wrong as it has been years since I watched those shows.

Either way, it doesn't matter. The person with the money ruled against him/her never pays a penny. Instead, he/she just gets less money for doing the show. There is no deadline, no "not paying", no real negative impact on the person, no credit report, no warrant, etc.
Click to expand...

I'm talking about real verdicts in small claims courts. If this 'show' was a real court.
 
Originally posted by: dullard
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
I have a question. Just how enforcable are these rulings?

If you are ruled $5000 against you, when do you have to pay by? What if you don't pay them? What kind of REAL negative impact does it bear on the person? Does it go on their credit rating? Do they get a warrant issued to them?
Click to expand...
See Mugs' post.

Although, my recollection was a bit different than what Mugs posted. I thought the total pot was $10k, not $5k (each side would get $5k +- the judgement amount). For example, the plantiff would get $5k + the $5k judgement = $10k, the defendant would get $5k-$5k judgement = $0. Although, I could be wrong as it has been years since I watched those shows.

Either way, it doesn't matter. The person with the money ruled against him/her never pays a penny. Instead, he/she just gets less money for doing the show. There is no deadline, no "not paying", no real negative impact on the person, no credit report, no warrant, etc.
Click to expand...

It's $5,000. And the rulings on the show are overturned many times, usually when Judge Judy oversteps her arbitrary bounds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top