• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

E90 M3

Originally posted by: TuffGuy
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
WTH designed that, Rice Magazine? 🙁
Click to expand...

WTF are you talking about? What's ricey about it?
Click to expand...

Something about everything below the "belt-line" IMO, too much going on. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
WTH designed that, Rice Magazine? 🙁
Click to expand...

Liter/type/valves 3.2/inline 6/24

Displacement 3246 cu cm

Bore/stroke 3.43/3.58 inch

Nominal output/rpm 333/7900 hp

Max. torque/rpm 262/4900 lb-ft

-Lifted from BMW North America-

Those are the spec.s for the current model M3, the E90 will be at least as powerful. To me at least that doesn't say ricer in any way.
 
Originally posted by: SilentRavens
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
WTH designed that, Rice Magazine? 🙁
Click to expand...

Liter/type/valves 3.2/inline 6/24

Displacement 3246 cu cm

Bore/stroke 3.43/3.58 inch

Nominal output/rpm 333/7900 hp

Max. torque/rpm 262/4900 lb-ft

-Lifted from BMW North America-

Those are the spec.s for the current model M3, the E90 will be at least as powerful. To me at least that doesn't say ricer in any way.
Click to expand...

IMO, the body panels say otherwise SilentRavens.
 
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: SilentRavens
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
WTH designed that, Rice Magazine? 🙁
Click to expand...

Liter/type/valves 3.2/inline 6/24

Displacement 3246 cu cm

Bore/stroke 3.43/3.58 inch

Nominal output/rpm 333/7900 hp

Max. torque/rpm 262/4900 lb-ft

-Lifted from BMW North America-

Those are the spec.s for the current model M3, the E90 will be at least as powerful. To me at least that doesn't say ricer in any way.
Click to expand...

IMO, the body panels say otherwise SilentRavens.
Click to expand...

IMHO, rice is more than just styling, the car has to have no power either for my rice rating. Plus its missing the most important part of that styling; the giant unnecessary wing. 😀
 
Originally posted by: SilentRavens
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: SilentRavens
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
WTH designed that, Rice Magazine? 🙁
Click to expand...

Liter/type/valves 3.2/inline 6/24

Displacement 3246 cu cm

Bore/stroke 3.43/3.58 inch

Nominal output/rpm 333/7900 hp

Max. torque/rpm 262/4900 lb-ft

-Lifted from BMW North America-

Those are the spec.s for the current model M3, the E90 will be at least as powerful. To me at least that doesn't say ricer in any way.
Click to expand...

IMO, the body panels say otherwise SilentRavens.
Click to expand...

IMHO, rice is more than just styling, the car has to have no power either for my rice rating. Plus its missing the most important part of that styling; the giant unnecessary wing. 😀
Click to expand...

It's probably one of the options though! 😛
 
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: SilentRavens
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: SilentRavens
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
WTH designed that, Rice Magazine? 🙁
Click to expand...

Liter/type/valves 3.2/inline 6/24

Displacement 3246 cu cm

Bore/stroke 3.43/3.58 inch

Nominal output/rpm 333/7900 hp

Max. torque/rpm 262/4900 lb-ft

-Lifted from BMW North America-

Those are the spec.s for the current model M3, the E90 will be at least as powerful. To me at least that doesn't say ricer in any way.
Click to expand...

IMO, the body panels say otherwise SilentRavens.
Click to expand...

IMHO, rice is more than just styling, the car has to have no power either for my rice rating. Plus its missing the most important part of that styling; the giant unnecessary wing. 😀
Click to expand...

It's probably one of the options though! 😛
Click to expand...

:beer:😉
 
It looks nice. More messy and busy then usual but it looks 'mean'.

I prefer the more clean cut lines though.

Koing
 
Originally posted by: SilentRavens
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: SilentRavens
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: SilentRavens
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
WTH designed that, Rice Magazine? 🙁
Click to expand...

Liter/type/valves 3.2/inline 6/24

Displacement 3246 cu cm

Bore/stroke 3.43/3.58 inch

Nominal output/rpm 333/7900 hp

Max. torque/rpm 262/4900 lb-ft

-Lifted from BMW North America-

Those are the spec.s for the current model M3, the E90 will be at least as powerful. To me at least that doesn't say ricer in any way.
Click to expand...

IMO, the body panels say otherwise SilentRavens.
Click to expand...

IMHO, rice is more than just styling, the car has to have no power either for my rice rating. Plus its missing the most important part of that styling; the giant unnecessary wing. 😀
Click to expand...

It's probably one of the options though! 😛
Click to expand...

:beer:😉
Click to expand...


In case you haven't noticed, none of the current M series has the option of a wing(well a large one anyway). Besides this is a photochop of a Mustang so it may or may not look anything like that...
 
Originally posted by: SilentRavens
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
WTH designed that, Rice Magazine? 🙁
Click to expand...

Liter/type/valves 3.2/inline 6/24

Displacement 3246 cu cm

Bore/stroke 3.43/3.58 inch

Nominal output/rpm 333/7900 hp

Max. torque/rpm 262/4900 lb-ft

-Lifted from BMW North America-

Those are the spec.s for the current model M3, the E90 will be at least as powerful. To me at least that doesn't say ricer in any way.
Click to expand...

Its actually going to have a new V8 with ~ 400 HP
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top