- Jun 28, 2004
- 1,791
- 201
- 106
Originally posted by: Duvie
commonsense would have expected those results or better...3800+ is only 2ghz and we know the 2.66ghz E6600 which is running 33% higher clock beat the FX62 (2.8ghz) chip most of the time and that was more like a 40% gain over the 3800+...
Originally posted by: Duvie
Originally posted by: phillyman36
I found it in the bios and disabled it but is still does it. It doesnt seem like a big deal i just did a test with dvd rebuilder pro and here are the results
x2-3800 it took dvd rebuilder a couple of seconds over 100 minutes
E6600 C2D it took dvd rebuilder a little over 65 minutes
Thats a 35% improvement so im happy i just wish i would have went with a mobo with a little more bling like the Asus P5w Dh
commonsense would have expected those results or better...3800+ is only 2ghz and we know the 2.66ghz E6600 which is running 33% higher clock beat the FX62 (2.8ghz) chip most of the time and that was more like a 40% gain over the 3800+...
It seems to extrapolate well...
Now that E6600 up to 3.2ghz and watch that time be in around 45minutes...
Originally posted by: dexvx
Originally posted by: Duvie
commonsense would have expected those results or better...3800+ is only 2ghz and we know the 2.66ghz E6600 which is running 33% higher clock beat the FX62 (2.8ghz) chip most of the time and that was more like a 40% gain over the 3800+...
E6600 is 2.4Ghz at stock.
Originally posted by: dexvx
Originally posted by: Duvie
commonsense would have expected those results or better...3800+ is only 2ghz and we know the 2.66ghz E6600 which is running 33% higher clock beat the FX62 (2.8ghz) chip most of the time and that was more like a 40% gain over the 3800+...
E6600 is 2.4Ghz at stock.