• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

E6600 WTF

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Duvie
commonsense would have expected those results or better...3800+ is only 2ghz and we know the 2.66ghz E6600 which is running 33% higher clock beat the FX62 (2.8ghz) chip most of the time and that was more like a 40% gain over the 3800+...

E6600 is 2.4Ghz at stock.
 
Originally posted by: Duvie
Originally posted by: phillyman36
I found it in the bios and disabled it but is still does it. It doesnt seem like a big deal i just did a test with dvd rebuilder pro and here are the results

x2-3800 it took dvd rebuilder a couple of seconds over 100 minutes
E6600 C2D it took dvd rebuilder a little over 65 minutes

Thats a 35% improvement so im happy i just wish i would have went with a mobo with a little more bling like the Asus P5w Dh

commonsense would have expected those results or better...3800+ is only 2ghz and we know the 2.66ghz E6600 which is running 33% higher clock beat the FX62 (2.8ghz) chip most of the time and that was more like a 40% gain over the 3800+...

It seems to extrapolate well...

Now that E6600 up to 3.2ghz and watch that time be in around 45minutes...

Yes, you are correct that the result are inline with expectations. Also, BTW:
E6600 = 2.4 Ghz. E6700 = 2.66 Ghz.

Edit: dexvx beat me to it
 
Originally posted by: dexvx
Originally posted by: Duvie
commonsense would have expected those results or better...3800+ is only 2ghz and we know the 2.66ghz E6600 which is running 33% higher clock beat the FX62 (2.8ghz) chip most of the time and that was more like a 40% gain over the 3800+...

E6600 is 2.4Ghz at stock.



Yep you are right!! my goof....It was the E6700 they tested versus the FX62...

Foot inserted in mouth...It seems to scale slightly better then I thought then...especially if the 3800+ was also oc'd to 2.2 or 2.4ghz


OP...


I have the board just NO E6600 from tankguys yetand I am not that impatient (in the middle of a home closing and packing) to pay a premium for an OEM chip...
 
Originally posted by: dexvx
Originally posted by: Duvie
commonsense would have expected those results or better...3800+ is only 2ghz and we know the 2.66ghz E6600 which is running 33% higher clock beat the FX62 (2.8ghz) chip most of the time and that was more like a 40% gain over the 3800+...

E6600 is 2.4Ghz at stock.


That just dawned on me thanks dexvx which mean my x2-3800 was overclocked to 2.2 i used the 10% overclock settings in the bios of the Asus A8n5x mobo i had
 
Back
Top