E. Warren could beat H. Clinton if they both run.

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
Hillary Clinton must be stopped as must Christie, but i think that E Warren could beat H. Clinton because although E. Warren is a better politician (and certainly not quite as evil)... for example, the latter is much better at pretending to balance between special interests and the common man. And to illustrate the aforementioned example, Elizabeth Warren is in AIPAC's court and AIPAC is in her court, but she can also come across as a populist unlike Hillary Clinton as Warren comes up with and supports popular bills while Hillary Clinton never came up with anything popular nor can is she remembered for championing anything popular.

Also, if Obama's support isn't a liability in 2016, then Warren would probably get it. Then another reason Warren could beat Hillary is the fact that Warren certainly isnt dumber than Hellary Clinton, as Hellary Clinton is unprepared (or at least she was in '08) and cant see the big picture like i cant.

Finally, Hellary Clinton isnt really a feminist because she thinks that females should be limited for their own good (how they dress for example) and that really comes across as elitist/conservative/islamically extremist rather than having faith in the people like Samuel J Tilden's ghost still does.
 
Last edited:

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
Both have the same problem, they will be in their late 60's come 2016.

Hillary Clinton born October 26, 1947 (will be 69 in 2016)

Elizabeth Warren born June 22, 1949 (will be 67 in 2016)
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
She wouldn't. I bet you 95% of people in America have never heard of Elizabeth warren. If I'm wrong, let's say 85% haven't and that is very generous. Go poll 100 average joes they will say they haven't heard of her.
 

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
She wouldn't. I bet you 95% of people in America have never heard of Elizabeth warren. If I'm wrong, let's say 85% haven't and that is very generous. Go poll 100 average joes they will say they haven't heard of her.
obama was like a bat out of hell.

and the fact that so many people do know of hillary clinton may be to her disadvantage.
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
The Dems had damn well better shit a great candidate if they don't want to lose in 2016. Hillary is not the one and she's not gonna run anyway.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,520
48,010
136
If Elizabeth Warren runs, she will have my enthusiastic vote.


Same here, that is the kind of woman I want in a position of leadership - not that brain donor puppets like Palin and Bachmann. Collins is good, but even though I like her I don't consider her on the same playing field as Warren. That lady kicks ass. I don't think I'd vote for Hillary, but she'd probably be preferable to whatever nutcase/pundit the GOTP selects.
 
Last edited:

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
If Elizabeth Warren runs, she will have my enthusiastic vote.

Yeah, you and the ~ 10-12 percent of Americans who identify as populists. She would get destroyed in the general election, perhaps by a worse margin than McGovern. Sarah Palin might be the only person who would lose against Warren, a perceived moderate like Christie would squash her like a bug.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
actually, the libertarian movement under Dr. Paul was populist and t. jefferson was a populist.

Yeah, that 10-12% includes libertarian populists too. Your anacho-capitalist fellow travellers may comprise 0.00001% of that 10-12%. And as a civil libertarian and moderate "big L" libertarian, I find your beliefs quite naive and don't doubt for a minute that Ron Paul is a racist scumbag.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Sadly, if she were running and had a realistic chance of winning, she'd probably get assassinated by corporate interests and/or interests in the military/industrial complex.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Sadly, if she were running and had a realistic chance of winning, she'd probably get assassinated by corporate interests and/or interests in the military/industrial complex.

She can't win because she is a moron. She is a socialist and people who supports her need to have their heads examined. This woman doesn't believe in freedom at all.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,453
136
She can't win because she is a moron. She is a socialist and people who supports her need to have their heads examined. This woman doesn't believe in freedom at all.

Crying-baby.jpg





LOL, happy holidays indigestible.
Just for you
safe_image.php
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Sadly, if she were running and had a realistic chance of winning, she'd probably get assassinated by corporate interests and/or interests in the military/industrial complex.

Don't worry, the "realistic chance" part isn't happening. National political figures rarely even give more than a passing semblance of populist positions, Pat Bucahan was the last in 1992 election perhaps? Even Warren is only making a handful of populist gestures, not embracing a full populist platform. For that matter, when was the last time a populist candidate won anything in a U.S. election? Andrew Jackson? William Jennings Bryant, who lost in the late 19th century?
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,453
136
So you came in the thread to attack me. Warren is a scumbag and socialist.

Have a Merry Christmas you miserable idiot and pathetic excuse for a human being.

I will, and my family will too. Here's wishing your 2014 brings you everything you deserve.

And Elizabeth Warren has more humanity, empathy and intellect in her navel fuzz than any tea party fucktard has in their entire being.

Warren 2016! (but she'd get tromped on in the general, unfortunately, too many idiots like indigestible out there)
 
Last edited:
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
I will, and my family will too. Here's wishing your 2014 brings you everything you deserve.

And Elizabeth Warren has more humanity, empathy and intellect in her navel fuzz than any tea party fucktard has in their entire being.

Warren 2016! (but she'd get tromped on in the general, unfortunately, too many idiots like indigestible out there)

Thank you:)

You're wrong about Warren. The Tea Party wants to stop out of control spending and obey the Constitution.

Warren is a socialist unlike obama who is a corporatist.

The fact that you support this piece of shit says a lot about you.

And you're right she would get her ass kicked so hard because of all the people who believe in freedom telling the scumbag NO!
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,453
136
Thank you:)

You're wrong about Warren. The Tea Party wants to stop out of control spending and obey the Constitution.

Warren is a socialist unlike obama who is a corporatist.

The fact that you support this piece of shit says a lot about you.

And you're right she would get her ass kicked so hard because of all the people who believe in freedom telling the scumbag NO!

LOL, right. Ok indigestible. Believe whatever your myopic views allow you to.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,453
136
Keep acting like an idiot. And you still haven't addressed the fact that warren is a socialist scumbag.

Because I don't equate socialism with the level of vitriol you do, you moronic, goat-fucking, corporatist.

Your "socialism" boogieman is long dead. The good old USA™ is too entrenched in the corporate environment to be called anything other than Oligarchy. But we are long overdue for someone to come in and try to not only limit, but eliminate corporate sway from our elected officials.

Yea, I know that's beyond a pipe-dream. But I have hope that someone like Warren would have the balls to do that.

Suck it, indigestible.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Because I don't equate socialism with the level of vitriol you do, you moronic, goat-fucking, corporatist.

Your "socialism" boogieman is long dead. The good old USA™ is too entrenched in the corporate environment to be called anything other than Oligarchy. But we are long overdue for someone to come in and try to not only limit, but eliminate corporate sway from our elected officials.

Yea, I know that's beyond a pipe-dream. But I have hope that someone like Warren would have the balls to do that.

Suck it, indigestible.

So you won't condemn socialism you moronic, goat-fucking, socialist.

Because I don't equate socialism with the level of vitriol you do

Such as the same hatred you have for the Tea Party?

The US is entrenched in the corporate environment because of too much government power but you're too stupid to understand that. This is just big government and its failure.

Suck it, moron.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,061
31,021
136
So you won't condemn socialism you moronic, goat-fucking, socialist.

Cool, you guys agree on your choice of farm animals to make sweet love to.

If they both run and some woman runs on the GOP side in 2016 who will Hustler get to play them in the inevitable porno?
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Cool, you guys agree on your choice of farm animals to make sweet love to.

If they both run and some woman runs on the GOP side in 2016 who will Hustler get to play them in the inevitable porno?

Cool, You're still an idiot and you guys have agreed on your choice of farm animals to make sweet love to. Still claiming to be a Christian?

No idea about them but warren is just disgusting especially considering she doesn't believe in freedom and the Constitution.