Hillary Clinton must be stopped as must Christie, but i think that E Warren could beat H. Clinton because although E. Warren is a better politician (and certainly not quite as evil)... for example, the latter is much better at pretending to balance between special interests and the common man. And to illustrate the aforementioned example, Elizabeth Warren is in AIPAC's court and AIPAC is in her court, but she can also come across as a populist unlike Hillary Clinton as Warren comes up with and supports popular bills while Hillary Clinton never came up with anything popular nor can is she remembered for championing anything popular.
Also, if Obama's support isn't a liability in 2016, then Warren would probably get it. Then another reason Warren could beat Hillary is the fact that Warren certainly isnt dumber than Hellary Clinton, as Hellary Clinton is unprepared (or at least she was in '08) and cant see the big picture like i cant.
Finally, Hellary Clinton isnt really a feminist because she thinks that females should be limited for their own good (how they dress for example) and that really comes across as elitist/conservative/islamically extremist rather than having faith in the people like Samuel J Tilden's ghost still does.
Also, if Obama's support isn't a liability in 2016, then Warren would probably get it. Then another reason Warren could beat Hillary is the fact that Warren certainly isnt dumber than Hellary Clinton, as Hellary Clinton is unprepared (or at least she was in '08) and cant see the big picture like i cant.
Finally, Hellary Clinton isnt really a feminist because she thinks that females should be limited for their own good (how they dress for example) and that really comes across as elitist/conservative/islamically extremist rather than having faith in the people like Samuel J Tilden's ghost still does.
Last edited:
