DX11 Benchmark

[nyker96]

Found the following DX11 benchmark, see what you get on your card, here's my results:

My system: x4 620@3,25 :: GTX 460/786@869core.

download: http://www.computemark.com/cm.php?show=download

 

[MoMeanMugs]

I got 2840 with the same settings as you, but I have MLAA on. Let me turn it off and see what I get.

Q9300@3.0GHz
5870 Crossfire@stock

 

[MoMeanMugs]

I got 3044 with MLAA off. Doesn't look like it's using Crossfire very much, if at all. The most the second card ever pulled was 5.42 amps, while a lot of the time it turned off. The primary card got as high as 61.55 amps. I got these numbers from HWMonitor.

 

[Will Robinson]

 

[nyker96]

The radeon 58xx looks pretty good in this benchmark I must say.

 

[Tsavo]

Odd benchmark.

Core i5 750 @ 3.2 GHz, GTX 460 1GB at 800, score was 2200 and change. Wicked the core and mem clock up a bit and just barely nailed down 2000.

 

[nemesismk2]

I got 1560 with my Palit GeForce GTS 450 Sonic used with Athlon II X2 240

 

[Skurge]

Norton Flags the exe as a virus.

If it weren't for my idiot brother I wouldn't be using an AV.

Anyway.
Got 1862 with a stock 5770, Phenom X3 720 @ 3.1Ghz

 

[bryanW1995]

I got 3044 with MLAA off. Doesn't look like it's using Crossfire very much, if at all. The most the second card ever pulled was 5.42 amps, while a lot of the time it turned off. The primary card got as high as 61.55 amps. I got these numbers from HWMonitor.

um, wow, 61.55 amps is a LOT more current than most 5870 users have for the psu. hx 620 is only 51 a for example, you'd need about a 730a psu for that single. card. most likely hwmonitor is confused and is showing the current from both cards combined, but even then I don't think that even two 5870's get enough power to run 61.55 amps.

 

[MoMeanMugs]

um, wow, 61.55 amps is a LOT more current than most 5870 users have for the psu. hx 620 is only 51 a for example, you'd need about a 730a psu for that single. card. most likely hwmonitor is confused and is showing the current from both cards combined, but even then I don't think that even two 5870's get enough power to run 61.55 amps.

That's at 1.44V, not 12V. I'm a EE that designs electronics, so I know when the magic smoke is about to come pouring out!

 

[MoMeanMugs]

Also, how is my little Q9300 system beating out the i7's? I got 3088 when running it one more time last night. I figured someone would come in and steal my thunder. Maybe I need to turn off Crossfire and see if it is indeed making a difference.

 

[dguy6789]

Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 3.4Ghz
Radeon HD 5870

http://pfxfqa.bay.livefilestore.com...o_15BpPvNS79MEXcl1MoQp/computemark.JPG?psid=1

 

[nyker96]

Odd benchmark.

Core i5 750 @ 3.2 GHz, GTX 460 1GB at 800, score was 2200 and change. Wicked the core and mem clock up a bit and just barely nailed down 2000.

somehow this fluid dynamics sim doesn't respond well to gtx architecture, upping ram/core don't seem to buy you much here.

Norton Flags the exe as a virus.

If it weren't for my idiot brother I wouldn't be using an AV.

Anyway.
Got 1862 with a stock 5770, Phenom X3 720 @ 3.1Ghz

right, Norton, better get a real AV. keep using Norton and it'll make a mess of your system ;] but decent score for a stock 57xx. I think this bench seriously favors ATI cards.

This ain't fair, I'd petition NV to pay them $2million to 're-optimiza' their code base so NV cards run at least 30% faster than any ATI card. ;]

 

[busydude]

Are you guys running that benchmark at 1024 X 600?

It is going to be severely CPU bottlenecked I guess, anyway I will run it once I get back home.

 

[MoMeanMugs]

Are you guys running that benchmark at 1024 X 600?

It is going to be severely CPU bottlenecked I guess, anyway I will run it once I get back home.

Results show otherwise.

 

[ZimZum]

3028

i7 930 @ 4.2ghz
5850

Interesting benchmark, cpu utilization was absolutely nil throughout.

 

[nyker96]

3028

i7 930 @ 4.2ghz
5850

Interesting benchmark, cpu utilization was absolutely nil throughout.

I think this bench is pretty pure gpu test.

 

[MrK6]

3471

Interesting benchmark. It would be nice to see those kind of flame effects in games.

 

[OmegaShadow]

i'm getting this error

"this application has failed to start because d2d11.dll was not found. re-installing the application may fix this problem."

reinstalled and still same problem.

 

[iGas]

Odd. Could be CPU constrain.

AMD 940BE @ 3.0 GHz.

2404 = 811MHz GTX 460
2452 = 1001MHz GTX 460

 

[AdamK47]

It doesn't play nice with SLI.

 

[busydude]

i'm getting this error "this application has failed to start because d2d11.dll was not found. re-installing the application may fix this problem." reinstalled and still same problem.

Assuming you installed this in system shown in your signature:

Because this is a DX 11 benchmark.. and XP does no support DX 11.

 

[OmegaShadow]

damn, i see.... alright thanks.

 

[iGas]

AMD 940BE @ 3.0 GHz.

2404 = 811MHz GTX 460
2452 = 1001MHz GTX 460


AMD 940BE @ 3.6 GHz.

2459 = 811MHz GTX 460
221945 = 902MHz GTX 460

 

[IGemini]

Yeah, not a CPU test at all. No activity other than switching the models.

Got around a 1930 with my system. Card is a 5770 factory OCed to 875/1225.