• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Duron or Thunderbird? What is the main difference?

Wingnut2242

Junior Member
Nov 18, 2000
12
0
0
What is the difference? Which is better? I am looking to build a system and am not sure what CPU to use. I see the Duron is cheaper, does that mean the thunderbird is better?
 

PlunX

Golden Member
May 26, 2000
1,001
0
0
From what I've heard, the Thunderbird is about 5% - 10% better than the Duron.. The thing to do would be to buy a Duron 600MHz for about $50 and then overclock it to at least 900MHz (assuming that you're able to do this)..
 

NoreagaCNN

Banned
Sep 28, 2000
2,267
0
0
Yea what he said and T-Bird is much better, even though Duron is way cheaper. Duron isnt too much a step down.

Peace,
Nore
 

Zedfu

Senior member
Sep 26, 2000
473
0
0
the duron has less cache, resulting in slower performance, but only about 5-10% performance loss compared to the tbird, so i'll be quite worth your money.
 

GaryTcs

Senior member
Oct 15, 2000
298
0
0
it seems that the duron is a bit better at overclocking. Maybe because the T-birds are already clocked higher. (closer to the architectures ceiling.)
 

Zedfu

Senior member
Sep 26, 2000
473
0
0
on the price/performance ratio, Duron is definitely the way to go. duron 600/700 are idea for overclocking, since the d600 will often get you around 900 if not 1ghz with proper cooling, and it only costs around $60! what else can you ask for? this is a bargain. the higher clocked cpu that you buy, the less price/performance ration you get, but it will likely get you a higher clock speed.