Duron or Thunderbird? What is the main difference?

Wingnut2242

Junior Member
Nov 18, 2000
12
0
0
What is the difference? Which is better? I am looking to build a system and am not sure what CPU to use. I see the Duron is cheaper, does that mean the thunderbird is better?
 

PlunX

Golden Member
May 26, 2000
1,001
0
0
From what I've heard, the Thunderbird is about 5% - 10% better than the Duron.. The thing to do would be to buy a Duron 600MHz for about $50 and then overclock it to at least 900MHz (assuming that you're able to do this)..
 

NoreagaCNN

Banned
Sep 28, 2000
2,267
0
0
Yea what he said and T-Bird is much better, even though Duron is way cheaper. Duron isnt too much a step down.

Peace,
Nore
 

Zedfu

Senior member
Sep 26, 2000
473
0
0
the duron has less cache, resulting in slower performance, but only about 5-10% performance loss compared to the tbird, so i'll be quite worth your money.
 

GaryTcs

Senior member
Oct 15, 2000
298
0
0
it seems that the duron is a bit better at overclocking. Maybe because the T-birds are already clocked higher. (closer to the architectures ceiling.)
 

Zedfu

Senior member
Sep 26, 2000
473
0
0
on the price/performance ratio, Duron is definitely the way to go. duron 600/700 are idea for overclocking, since the d600 will often get you around 900 if not 1ghz with proper cooling, and it only costs around $60! what else can you ask for? this is a bargain. the higher clocked cpu that you buy, the less price/performance ration you get, but it will likely get you a higher clock speed.