• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Duron or Thunderbird? What is the main difference?

Wingnut2242

Junior Member
What is the difference? Which is better? I am looking to build a system and am not sure what CPU to use. I see the Duron is cheaper, does that mean the thunderbird is better?
 
From what I've heard, the Thunderbird is about 5% - 10% better than the Duron.. The thing to do would be to buy a Duron 600MHz for about $50 and then overclock it to at least 900MHz (assuming that you're able to do this)..
 
the duron has less cache, resulting in slower performance, but only about 5-10% performance loss compared to the tbird, so i'll be quite worth your money.
 
it seems that the duron is a bit better at overclocking. Maybe because the T-birds are already clocked higher. (closer to the architectures ceiling.)
 
on the price/performance ratio, Duron is definitely the way to go. duron 600/700 are idea for overclocking, since the d600 will often get you around 900 if not 1ghz with proper cooling, and it only costs around $60! what else can you ask for? this is a bargain. the higher clocked cpu that you buy, the less price/performance ration you get, but it will likely get you a higher clock speed.
 
Back
Top