JohnCU
Banned
- Dec 9, 2000
- 16,528
- 4
- 0
Originally posted by: ElFenix
i dunno if it's actually much tougher though. the only team that they've played so far that has beaten anyone of consequence is arkansas.Originally posted by: dullard
The key is that USC won. And USC played a much tougher schedule. Think about Ohio State when they won their last championship - they were losing in about half of their games with a minute or so left. A good team pulls out the win in a tough situation.Originally posted by: ElFenix
wv gets style points. they have yet to allow a team they should be dominating hang with them until time expires. USC has both the last two weeks.
i guess i could do the same and say that the only team ohio state has played that has beaten anyone of consequence is texas.
but one of each doesn't mean USC has had a 'much tougher' schedule. none of the other teams on USC's and OSU's schedule are all that great. i'd say iowa is probably better than nebraska, but i'm not sure of it. give them 10 games iowa probably wins 6.
Originally posted by: JohnCU
we beat FSU when they were #9. we have scored over 50 points in 3 games this year.
i don't like this 'when they were' stuff. FSU is a middle of the pack football team at best this year. it's like when goalposts came down when texas went 4-7 in 1997. oh boy you beat a crappy football team!
as i just explained, USC has only played 1 team who has beaten anyone else this year. until they beat oregon, cal, and notre lame, their schedule isn't really any more difficult than anyone else's.Originally posted by: mpitts
People here don't give USC credit because they all think that the PAC-10 is weak. The truth is that it isn't. USC will probably wind up with one of the five toughest schedules in the nation. USC is going to have their tests against Notre Dame and California.
yeah i agree FSU sucks but we'll show everyone how good we are when we play GA Tech next Saturday.
