Skyclad1uhm1
Lifer
- Aug 10, 2001
- 11,383
- 87
- 91
A better solution would be to follow the drone back to its owner and beat the owner holding the transmitter over the head with the drone.
'Kill' two birds with one drone :awe:
wasn't me. feces are my weapon of choice. haven't figured out sticks yet.
Would not work, most, including mine have a failsafe function, and will return to where they were launched, and land if they lose signal. Mine will climb 75 feet before doing so.
EDIT; perhaps if you were to jam most, if not all 6 GPS satellites that guide it?
He's saying that "drone" is a misnomer when applied to these small UAVs. These are simply UAVs. Technically, it's only a "drone" if it flies itself to the coordinates you give it, and enters a holding pattern automatically -- with no need to be piloted directly.
Anyway, the air above your property is sometimes occupied by aircraft.
Semantics.
As for aircraft, that's why the signal wouldn't be that powerful.
I'm just saying it would be a fun engineering project. I doubt I'll ever find the time to figure out all the field theory.
Then I guess that what I have IS a droneI can program 3 waypoints with a smartphone, it will hover briefly at each one then return to launch site.
I don't even think it's really "semantics." If you have to pilot the thing, it's not a "drone." I have no idea why that name stuck.
We have a neighbor with a quadcopter who succeeded in pissing off the entire neighborhood one weekend. he insisted what he was doing was legal. We made it clear that no matter what, it was not going to be worth the hassle. He gave up
A BB gun would probably take one down and you would not be charged with discharging a firearm in a dangerous fashion. I've got one of those old Daisy one's from the '50's that will sink a BB into marine plywood.
Buy a bunch of dirt-cheap quadcopters on Amazon. Kamikaze's making a comeback.A BB gun would probably take one down and you would not be charged with discharging a firearm in a dangerous fashion. I've got one of those old Daisy one's from the '50's that will sink a BB into marine plywood.
We have a neighbor with a quadcopter who succeeded in pissing off the entire neighborhood one weekend. he insisted what he was doing was legal. We made it clear that no matter what, it was not going to be worth the hassle. He gave up
he was hovering down into the trees on our property, into the yard itself. An overflight of the trees would be at ~120' or so, he came in over the trees and let down to 40'. Wife was not pleased.
The other neighbors yard is much more open and accessible, and he was buzzing around in it at ~10'.
Buy a bunch of dirt-cheap quadcopters on Amazon. Kamikaze's making a comeback.
Or go for something pricey and sophisticated, and do a synchronized Zerg rush to escort it out of your airspace.
Or...outfit it with something suitable for capture. Increase your fleet size.
He was below Chimp With Stick (CWS) altitude, and more like Lightly Tossed Rock ( LTR) or Garden Hose (GH) altitude.
The neighbors he riled up were too slow or they could have just chased it down![]()
There's a ton you can do with these multirotors. Out of the box my low end Phantom 1 can use its on-board GPS to:
![]()
- Fly home automically if it loses com with the controller
- Fly home if the battery voltage drops to low
- Hold postion in the wind
Automatic Return to Home
Mine has a top speed of 20-25mph and a listed range of 300m/1000ft. However that range is excessively conservative. On YouTube you can find folks who've taken them up over 2000ft or miles away. It also can carry a GoPro.
With the appropriate add-ons you can do first person view flying out of linear sight.
![]()
Phantom chases down a cruise ship 2.3KM
So I consider it a Drone platform. It has autonomous, semi-autonomous, and beyond visual sight capabilities just like military drones. They really aren't toys.