Red Hawk
Diamond Member
- Jan 1, 2011
- 3,266
- 169
- 106
We won't be agreeing anytime soon, I see. I do wonder if your stance will change as the micro transactions continue to grow unchecked like a cancer in games though. Are you prepared to pay 70 dollars for a game, a monthly fee for multiplayer, plus the MTs for weapons, characters, classes, maps, etc? Thats the road gaming is on, and one that some seem proud to be on.
Well there's an argument to be made that, with inflation and expanding game development costs, that games should be $70, but no publisher is brave enough to start selling games at that price, so they've snuck it in through things like day 1 DLC and "deluxe" editions of games. But that's tangential to the discussion about multiplayer.
All I'm saying is that I found ME3's multiplayer system to be fair and that it benefited both paying and non-players. I don't pay anything, under that system, but I still get the maps, weapons, characters, etc. If they keep it that way, I'm fine with it. If they do something like charge monthly for multiplayer or what not -- which, you know, is not really that outlandish of an idea, as evidenced by the success of paid MMORPGs. But the decline of paid MMORPGs is also an indication that other multiplayer games won't head that direction -- then I'll respond by not paying for it. I enjoyed Mass Effect 3's multiplayer, but I wouldn't pay extra for it past the cost of buying the game.