- Oct 24, 2000
- 29,767
- 33
- 81
DPreview.com Exclusive: Canon EOS 350D Hands-On Preview
- Thread starter GTaudiophile
- Start date
Nice find. Looks like they are still posting the review on the site. I can't go any further than page 3.
Sucks that I just bought a 20D. This looks just as good.
Sucks that I just bought a 20D. This looks just as good.
- Oct 24, 2000
- 29,767
- 33
- 81
Eh, I bought one too...so it's a sunk cost
But I still think the 20D is better-built, designed to take more of a licking. Then again, since I baby my stuff, it would have probably made more sense for me to have bought a 350D and some nice L glass instead.
Damn.
This thing has the same battery as the Powershot S60 which I have and the Optura 500 which I also have. It would have been nice to be able to swap the same battery between all of them.
This thing has the same battery as the Powershot S60 which I have and the Optura 500 which I also have. It would have been nice to be able to swap the same battery between all of them.
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Eh, I bought one too...so it's a sunk cost
But I still think the 20D is better-built, designed to take more of a licking. Then again, since I baby my stuff, it would have probably made more sense for me to have bought a 350D and some nice L glass instead.
hahah, does the L series lens cost more than most camera?
Originally posted by: toant103
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Eh, I bought one too...so it's a sunk cost
But I still think the 20D is better-built, designed to take more of a licking. Then again, since I baby my stuff, it would have probably made more sense for me to have bought a 350D and some nice L glass instead.
hahah, does the L series lens cost more than most camera?
I think there is an L series lens that costs $70,000.
- Oct 24, 2000
- 29,767
- 33
- 81
Originally posted by: toant103
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Eh, I bought one too...so it's a sunk cost
But I still think the 20D is better-built, designed to take more of a licking. Then again, since I baby my stuff, it would have probably made more sense for me to have bought a 350D and some nice L glass instead.
hahah, does the L series lens cost more than most camera?
Cheapest L lens is like $800 I think. Then the sky is the limit.
Any serious photographer will spend much more on lenses than camera bodies.Originally posted by: toant103
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Eh, I bought one too...so it's a sunk cost
But I still think the 20D is better-built, designed to take more of a licking. Then again, since I baby my stuff, it would have probably made more sense for me to have bought a 350D and some nice L glass instead.
hahah, does the L series lens cost more than most camera?
- Oct 24, 2000
- 29,767
- 33
- 81
Originally posted by: ggnl
Any serious photographer will spend much more on lenses than camera bodies.Originally posted by: toant103
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Eh, I bought one too...so it's a sunk cost
But I still think the 20D is better-built, designed to take more of a licking. Then again, since I baby my stuff, it would have probably made more sense for me to have bought a 350D and some nice L glass instead.
hahah, does the L series lens cost more than most camera?
Though I must say that Canon is being a biatch about new lenses. What they offer now are pretty old designs (aside from the EF-S lenses). L lenses, though great, do tend to be heavy too. Canon needs to revamp their lineup, and I am excited to see Sigma and Tamron taking up some of the slack.
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Originally posted by: toant103
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Eh, I bought one too...so it's a sunk cost
But I still think the 20D is better-built, designed to take more of a licking. Then again, since I baby my stuff, it would have probably made more sense for me to have bought a 350D and some nice L glass instead.
hahah, does the L series lens cost more than most camera?
I think there is an L series lens that costs $70,000.
damn, got a link?
Originally posted by: toant103
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Originally posted by: toant103
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Eh, I bought one too...so it's a sunk cost
But I still think the 20D is better-built, designed to take more of a licking. Then again, since I baby my stuff, it would have probably made more sense for me to have bought a 350D and some nice L glass instead.
hahah, does the L series lens cost more than most camera?
I think there is an L series lens that costs $70,000.
damn, got a link?
Text
- Oct 28, 1999
- 62,484
- 8,345
- 126
:frown:
I'm thinking I'll wait for the 20D successor to come out and use that as my next upgrade path. Keep the 300D as a backup cam or second cam if I get into sports shooting and want a different optical range without swapping lenses on the main.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter