Don't you think it'd be cool if the government...

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: schizoid

I know! Perhaps we should hold a "National Day for Homeless people to Have Homes" Day. That way, we could stop homelessness because all the homeless people would have homes, thereby not being homeless.

WHY HASN'T SOMEONE DONE THIS ALREADY?

Well, it just occured to me that we'd need money for the homes, right? So, perhaps we could, like, hold auctions and stuff. See, what we'd do is, if you made a certain amount of money, and had a bunch of nice stuff, then the government could take it and auction it off and use the money to pay for homes for the homeless so the homeless would have homes and thereby not be homeless.

Sound good?

hey, and the homeless could be employed building the houses! so, not only would they not be homeless, they'd also have jobs!

 

[schizoid]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: schizoid

I know! Perhaps we should hold a "National Day for Homeless people to Have Homes" Day. That way, we could stop homelessness because all the homeless people would have homes, thereby not being homeless.

WHY HASN'T SOMEONE DONE THIS ALREADY?

Well, it just occured to me that we'd need money for the homes, right? So, perhaps we could, like, hold auctions and stuff. See, what we'd do is, if you made a certain amount of money, and had a bunch of nice stuff, then the government could take it and auction it off and use the money to pay for homes for the homeless so the homeless would have homes and thereby not be homeless.

Sound good?

hey, and the homeless could be employed building the houses! so, not only would they not be homeless, they'd also have jobs!

Right! And then the homeless could just EAT other homeless people who weren't working quite as well, so hunger wouldn't be a problem.

And then we could just kill all the Mexicans too!

THEN OUR WORLD WOULD BE PERFECT*

















































































*Eventually you'd figure the quality of mexican food would suffer, given that there'd be no Mexican people left alive.

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: schizoid


*Eventually you'd figure the quality of mexican food would suffer, given that there'd be no Mexican people left alive.

yeah, i couldn't live without mexican food

 

[Crazymofo]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: schizoid


*Eventually you'd figure the quality of mexican food would suffer, given that there'd be no Mexican people left alive.

yeah, i couldn't live without mexican food

same here, wouldn't want to miss out on my qdobas!!

 

[schizoid]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: schizoid


*Eventually you'd figure the quality of mexican food would suffer, given that there'd be no Mexican people left alive.

yeah, i couldn't live without mexican food

Me neither.

Ok, so scrap the idea to kill all the mexicans.

How about we kill all the small-dicked, right-wing, psuedo-technie punks with overly conservative, secretly-racist and ulitmately self-defeating world-views. I don't think that would have quite the same impact on the quality of mexican food.

Which would be good.

 

[schizoid]

Uhh...double post.

So I'll take this moment to mourn the passing of the club chalupa, the king of all chalupas. May you rest in peace.

 

[schizoid]

Triple post.

I'd like to take this moment to point out that Jim Jackson is an over-rated defender.

 

[schizoid]

fourth-le post.

So, while I've got ya', I might as well mention that Amaya is one of the hottest chicks to ever be on the real world.

 

[AvesPKS]

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: schizoid

I know! Perhaps we should hold a "National Day for Homeless people to Have Homes" Day. That way, we could stop homelessness because all the homeless people would have homes, thereby not being homeless.

WHY HASN'T SOMEONE DONE THIS ALREADY?

Well, it just occured to me that we'd need money for the homes, right? So, perhaps we could, like, hold auctions and stuff. See, what we'd do is, if you made a certain amount of money, and had a bunch of nice stuff, then the government could take it and auction it off and use the money to pay for homes for the homeless so the homeless would have homes and thereby not be homeless.

Sound good?

hey, and the homeless could be employed building the houses! so, not only would they not be homeless, they'd also have jobs!

And they could pay...themselves...to...build...their...own...homes...
/*head explodes

 

[schizoid]

Originally posted by: AvesPKS

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: schizoid

I know! Perhaps we should hold a "National Day for Homeless people to Have Homes" Day. That way, we could stop homelessness because all the homeless people would have homes, thereby not being homeless.

WHY HASN'T SOMEONE DONE THIS ALREADY?

Well, it just occured to me that we'd need money for the homes, right? So, perhaps we could, like, hold auctions and stuff. See, what we'd do is, if you made a certain amount of money, and had a bunch of nice stuff, then the government could take it and auction it off and use the money to pay for homes for the homeless so the homeless would have homes and thereby not be homeless.

Sound good?

hey, and the homeless could be employed building the houses! so, not only would they not be homeless, they'd also have jobs!

And they could pay...themselves...to...build...their...own...homes...
/*head explodes

That was actually funny!

KUDOS AND ACCOLADES!

 

[So]

Originally posted by: schizoid

Originally posted by: AvesPKS

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: schizoid

I know! Perhaps we should hold a "National Day for Homeless people to Have Homes" Day. That way, we could stop homelessness because all the homeless people would have homes, thereby not being homeless.

WHY HASN'T SOMEONE DONE THIS ALREADY?

Well, it just occured to me that we'd need money for the homes, right? So, perhaps we could, like, hold auctions and stuff. See, what we'd do is, if you made a certain amount of money, and had a bunch of nice stuff, then the government could take it and auction it off and use the money to pay for homes for the homeless so the homeless would have homes and thereby not be homeless.

Sound good?

hey, and the homeless could be employed building the houses! so, not only would they not be homeless, they'd also have jobs!

And they could pay...themselves...to...build...their...own...homes...
/*head explodes

That was actually funny!

KUDOS AND ACCOLADES!

Who pays for the materials? Jesus?

I think I hate you Schitzoid.

 

[ElFenix]

Originally posted by: So

Originally posted by: schizoid

Originally posted by: AvesPKS

Originally posted by: ElFenix

Originally posted by: schizoid

I know! Perhaps we should hold a "National Day for Homeless people to Have Homes" Day. That way, we could stop homelessness because all the homeless people would have homes, thereby not being homeless.

WHY HASN'T SOMEONE DONE THIS ALREADY?

Well, it just occured to me that we'd need money for the homes, right? So, perhaps we could, like, hold auctions and stuff. See, what we'd do is, if you made a certain amount of money, and had a bunch of nice stuff, then the government could take it and auction it off and use the money to pay for homes for the homeless so the homeless would have homes and thereby not be homeless.

Sound good?

hey, and the homeless could be employed building the houses! so, not only would they not be homeless, they'd also have jobs!

And they could pay...themselves...to...build...their...own...homes...
/*head explodes

That was actually funny!

KUDOS AND ACCOLADES!

Who pays for the materials? Jesus?

I think I hate you Schitzoid.

you suck at reading posts that you quoted!

Well, it just occured to me that we'd need money for the homes, right? So, perhaps we could, like, hold auctions and stuff. See, what we'd do is, if you made a certain amount of money, and had a bunch of nice stuff, then the government could take it and auction it off and use the money to pay for homes for the homeless so the homeless would have homes and thereby not be homeless.

 

[schizoid]

Seriously...here's my idea:

We take the homeless, and pay them a real wage to build houses, thereby decreasing homelessness and unemployment. Those people who HAVE homes, but are unemployed, we kick out of their houses, making them homeless. We stick homeless people in their newly vacated houses, so now we've decreased homelessness even more. The new guy, who is now homeless will just build a house and not be homeless any more! And we've gained something because if we remember, that guy wasn't employed, and now he has a job: building a house for himself!

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Your are really bored.

 

[So]

Originally posted by: schizoid
Seriously...here's my idea:

We take the homeless, and pay them a real wage to build houses, thereby decreasing homelessness and unemployment. Those people who HAVE homes, but are unemployed, we kick out of their houses, making them homeless. We stick homeless people in their newly vacated houses, so now we've decreased homelessness even more. The new guy, who is now homeless will just build a house and not be homeless any more! And we've gained something because if we remember, that guy wasn't employed, and now he has a job: building a house for himself!

This is extremely shortsighted.

1. Once again, where will the $$ for the materials come from
2. Where are you going to get the land for this?
3. Who is going to train these guys with building skills?
4. What do they do once they finish their house? Don't say building other houses....this can't bew a perpetual cycle. Besides, if you made houses free, people would just leave their apartments and become homeless then they would get a free house.

 

[schizoid]

Originally posted by: So

Originally posted by: schizoid
Seriously...here's my idea:

We take the homeless, and pay them a real wage to build houses, thereby decreasing homelessness and unemployment. Those people who HAVE homes, but are unemployed, we kick out of their houses, making them homeless. We stick homeless people in their newly vacated houses, so now we've decreased homelessness even more. The new guy, who is now homeless will just build a house and not be homeless any more! And we've gained something because if we remember, that guy wasn't employed, and now he has a job: building a house for himself!

This is extremely shortsighted.

1. Once again, where will the $$ for the materials come from
2. Where are you going to get the land for this?
3. Who is going to train these guys with building skills?
4. What do they do once they finish their house? Don't say building other houses....this can't bew a perpetual cycle. Besides, if you made houses free, people would just leave their apartments and become homeless then they would get a free house.

Ok, I know I may have been joking before, but perhaps you should give some SERIOUS thought to an economics class. If you can't see how this would work, you probably shouldn't be using a computer.

I mean, seriously guys....

 

[Jzero]

Originally posted by: schizoid

Originally posted by: So

Originally posted by: schizoid
Seriously...here's my idea:

We take the homeless, and pay them a real wage to build houses, thereby decreasing homelessness and unemployment. Those people who HAVE homes, but are unemployed, we kick out of their houses, making them homeless. We stick homeless people in their newly vacated houses, so now we've decreased homelessness even more. The new guy, who is now homeless will just build a house and not be homeless any more! And we've gained something because if we remember, that guy wasn't employed, and now he has a job: building a house for himself!

This is extremely shortsighted.

1. Once again, where will the $$ for the materials come from
2. Where are you going to get the land for this?
3. Who is going to train these guys with building skills?
4. What do they do once they finish their house? Don't say building other houses....this can't bew a perpetual cycle. Besides, if you made houses free, people would just leave their apartments and become homeless then they would get a free house.

Ok, I know I may have been joking before, but perhaps you should give some SERIOUS thought to an economics class. If you can't see how this would work, you probably shouldn't be using a computer.

I mean, seriously guys....

They can be like Doozers on Fraggle Rock, endlessly building day after day only to have the Fraggles show up and eat their labor as a midnight snack.

 

[So]

Originally posted by: schizoid

Originally posted by: So

Originally posted by: schizoid
Seriously...here's my idea:

We take the homeless, and pay them a real wage to build houses, thereby decreasing homelessness and unemployment. Those people who HAVE homes, but are unemployed, we kick out of their houses, making them homeless. We stick homeless people in their newly vacated houses, so now we've decreased homelessness even more. The new guy, who is now homeless will just build a house and not be homeless any more! And we've gained something because if we remember, that guy wasn't employed, and now he has a job: building a house for himself!

This is extremely shortsighted.

1. Once again, where will the $$ for the materials come from
2. Where are you going to get the land for this?
3. Who is going to train these guys with building skills?
4. What do they do once they finish their house? Don't say building other houses....this can't bew a perpetual cycle. Besides, if you made houses free, people would just leave their apartments and become homeless then they would get a free house.

Ok, I know I may have been joking before, but perhaps you should give some SERIOUS thought to an economics class. If you can't see how this would work, you probably shouldn't be using a computer.

I mean, seriously guys....

I HAVE taken an economics class. Clearly, you have not.

 

[schizoid]

Originally posted by: So

Originally posted by: schizoid

Originally posted by: So

Originally posted by: schizoid
Seriously...here's my idea:

We take the homeless, and pay them a real wage to build houses, thereby decreasing homelessness and unemployment. Those people who HAVE homes, but are unemployed, we kick out of their houses, making them homeless. We stick homeless people in their newly vacated houses, so now we've decreased homelessness even more. The new guy, who is now homeless will just build a house and not be homeless any more! And we've gained something because if we remember, that guy wasn't employed, and now he has a job: building a house for himself!

This is extremely shortsighted.

1. Once again, where will the $$ for the materials come from
2. Where are you going to get the land for this?
3. Who is going to train these guys with building skills?
4. What do they do once they finish their house? Don't say building other houses....this can't bew a perpetual cycle. Besides, if you made houses free, people would just leave their apartments and become homeless then they would get a free house.

Ok, I know I may have been joking before, but perhaps you should give some SERIOUS thought to an economics class. If you can't see how this would work, you probably shouldn't be using a computer.

I mean, seriously guys....

I HAVE taken an economics class. Clearly, you have not.

Ooooh...good comeback!

For real, man. It's too bad people like you vote. I can't see how you could not understand the logic behind this. Can you really tell me you can find a flaw?

Didn't think so.