Vic
Elite Member
- Jun 12, 2001
- 50,415
- 14,305
- 136
Remember when being Presidential actually meant something?
Betteridge's law of headlines - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Asking a question in such a manner allows people to peddle bullshit with 0 supporting evidence.
It also places a burden of proof on the accused rather than the accuser, and proving a negative is virtually impossible. Unless you'd like to prove to all of us that you do not in fact have relations with goats. Maybe you do? Who am I to judge? Someone should investigate it though 🙄🙄
You know what the intent of his Tweet was, don't you?There is a lot of difference between what he said and an outright accusation, that is obvious.
I'm surprised you can't tell the difference.
Glad you agree that Trump's Tweet is stupid.As to your BS about goats, I'll just ignore the stupidity.
You know what the intent of his Tweet was, don't you?
There is a lot of difference between what he said and an outright accusation, that is obvious.
I'm surprised you can't tell the difference.
There is a lot of difference between what he said and an outright accusation, that is obvious.
I'm surprised you can't tell the difference.
He's being a literalist just to piss people off. It probably gets him off at night.jesus fucking christ
He's being a literalist just to piss people off. It probably gets him off at night.
You do realize that the English language is not confined to literalism, don't you?Sorry you don't like the English language.
I'm not going to accuse you of being stupid. Some people think so. Why is pcgeek11 so stupid they ask? I don't know?
There is a lot of difference between what he said and an outright accusation, that is obvious.
I'm surprised you can't tell the difference.
I think the context that you are missing is that this isn't political points scoring, its insinuating that someone is guilty of murder and trying to use your influence to force a malicious prosecution.Don't quote me out of context:
All politicians use word play to make political points.
Do you know what a question mark is?
I know you do.
I think the context that you are missing is that this isn't political points scoring, its insinuating that someone is guilty of murder and trying to use your influence to force a malicious prosecution.
He's poking stupid people in the stupid part of their brains.I sure do.
Stirring up the old wasp nest... I see it is working.
Maybe geek? Should go to the airport? Go through security? And say stupid shit about bombs? But just put a question mark after every sentence? He could also send a letter to the POTUS? See what happens?So you agree with me.
I agree it is a play on words just as all politicians play this game. I also understand the punctuation marks at the end of the sentence. It wouldn't ever hold water in any court.
You do realize that the English language is not confined to literalism, don't you?
Do you believe his tweet was intended to smear Scarborough, or do you believe it was a lie?
Trump raised a question, which in and of itself was grossly inappropriate given that there is no mystery to what happened to that staffer. But he didn't stop there. He gave his own opinion as to the answer.
Tell me this. What did Trump mean by the phrase "isn't it obvious?" If it doesn't mean what I think it means, then provide another reasonable interpretation please.
I think the context that you are missing is that this isn't political points scoring, its insinuating that someone is guilty of murder and trying to use your influence to force a malicious prosecution.
Or just to slime the guy and ruin his reputation.
If everyone who Trump has defamed actually sued him, it's possible he could be liable for 100x his net worth.
What do you "think" it means? Answer that and maybe I can answer your question.
When will they open a Cold Case on the Psycho Joe Scarborough matter in Florida. Did he get away with murder? Some people think so. Why did he leave Congress so quietly and quickly? Isn’t it obvious? What’s happening now? A total nut job!
In my opinion after over three years it is glaringly obvious that he loves to stir the pot.
It is also obvious that he is quite good at pot stirring.
I'm not sure why you think that makes it better or less egregious.It is an Old Conspiracy theory that has been around the block since 2001. Nothing new to see.
PolitiFact: Donald Trump’s Pants on Fire ‘unsolved mystery’ attack on Joe Scarborough
A renewed attack on the MSNBC host still doesn’t rate.www.tampabay.com
Here it is in full for reference:
In the sequence of things, he says it is obvious that he left Congress so "quickly" and "quietly" because he killed his staffer. Or is there another reason for him allegedly leaving Congress so "quickly" and "quietly" that Trump is thinking about? If so, he doesn't say what it is.
BTW, if that is Trump's insinuation, and I see no other possible interpretation, the fact is the staffer died after Scarborough announced his resignation, not before. It was during the period of over three months notice that Scarborough gave for his resignation.
Jacksonville.com: U.S. Rep. Scarborough to resign 5/25/01
Rep. Joe Scarborough of Florida, a charter member of the Republican Revolution of 1994, said Friday he would resign to spend more time with his two sons.web.archive.org
Also, the fact the media reported on May 25 that he was resigning effective September 6 means, by definition, his resignation was neither "quick" nor "quiet." I just disproved three assertions made by Trump with a simple google search and one old article.
Is this the sort of behavior we really want from our President?