• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

DOJ to hold 11:00 AM EST live announcement

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
pauldun170 said:
Considering the jackasses running the show, I'm guessing its a BS announcement to shape narratives ahead of the VP debate tonight and to shift conversation away from Idiots boy's tweetstorming covid shitstorm
Click to expand...

I'm not so sure that this is the result of Trumps 7 days covid riddled drug fest.
I think this was preplanned for release today.

Hilarious redaction is hilariously redacted.
To sum up for those not willing to be bothered...CIA reported that someone alleged that Clinton approved a plan to vilify Trump....
during a disinformation campaign by the Russia.

What you are witnessing is the DOJ doing the "Some people are saying...." thing Trump does all the time and trying top pass it off as fact.

It's a shitnugget for a specific demographic of the Foxnews watching crowd.
DOJ is basically releasing key words for all the little content generation houses.
They might be worried about the 65+ demographic reacting to a Woman making a "Precious Christian White Man" look bad in tonights debate. "Hillary Clinton" still tests well as a way to increase unfavorable opinions of professional women.

By reintroducing "Hillary Clinton" into news feed, you increase animosity to any women who do not observe the subservient keep your mouth shut ideal preferred by older Christian voters.


I wish I had free time to today. I could grab a couple of memos apply the same BS
 
I was sure it was going to be an announcement of the retribution indictments against those who participated in the Russia probe. Maybe that's next week's October surprise.
 
Fanatical Meat said:
I do like how basically no news network plays into the Presidents Circus anymore.

Nothing on CNN
Nothing but a brief mention on msnbc
Nothing on local Fox station

I’ll wait for experts to dig thru the material. Whole thing sounds like the President is trying to recreate the magic of 2016.
Click to expand...
MSNBC had complete coverage, and only pulled away during the questioning. Not sure which country you are in.
 
Jaskalas said:
Did I see a nothing burger?
Click to expand...
This is a good thing (the indictments). The timing, as with everything is suspicious only, as just another way of getting people to not pay any attention to the mad man in the WH tweeting like he' on a 3 day meth run.
 
Last edited:
Does anybody care about this?
i haven’t heard anything about if on the radio news and none of my deplorable’s are raging about it on Facebook *I do have about half my deplorable’s blocked until post election
 
Saw this come up on the news feed. Read about the ISIS Beatles many years ago. Also knew they were a few captured years ago. Could only conclude that they were back in the news as a political stunt. yep...pretty much that. Oh...they wre shipped to the US to face life in prison charges...on top of their already life in prison charges....yeah I guess maybe something for the very few American families involved in this.
 
At this point in time, if it has anything to do with people in Trump's administration that he can bully into compliance, all roads lead back to his attempts at winning an election he clearly does not deserve to win. Fvck all with any other thing he's personally responsible for as POTUS.

He was a virtual unknown as a politician back in '16 where he could say anything he wanted to, promise anything he could think of and freely lie his ass off with no restrictions that a prior political record would hold him to.

Well now he has a disgraceful criminally indicative record he has to defend along with how his personality disorders and highly suspect dealings with his Russian financiers (among so many other failings of his) he needs to account for yet will have to refuse to fess up to.
 
tweaker2 said:
At this point in time, if it has anything to do with people in Trump's administration that he can bully into compliance, all roads lead back to his attempts at winning an election he clearly does not deserve to win. Fvck all with any other thing he's personally responsible for as POTUS.

He was a virtual unknown as a politician back in '16 where he could say anything he wanted to, promise anything he could think of and freely lie his ass off with no restrictions that a prior political record would hold him to.

Well now he has a disgraceful criminally indicative record he has to defend along with how his personality disorders and highly suspect dealings with his Russian financiers (among so many other failings of his) he needs to account for yet will have to refuse to fess up to.
Click to expand...

Funny thing is Barr was also AG back in Papa Bush's Administration (1991-93) and by all accounts, was then a fairly normal, noncontroversial AG. Put him in a criminal Administration and he enthusiastically participates willingly in whatever his boss wants without regard to the law or his duties to the Constitution.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top