Doesn't the senate have better things to do?

[Future Shock]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam

Originally posted by: Future Shock

Originally posted by: 6000SUX
Come on-- they HURT? Hahaha. Where'd you get that line, from "Saturday Night Fever"? Masturbation would clear that up just fine anyway. Your lack of concentration does not create a market for sex partners-- your lack of morals does.

Once again, you have totally confused cause and effect - my high sex drive is only a cause...what I do about it is an effect. And the cause has NOTHING to do with my morals...it has to do with biology, and having a healthy supply of male horomones. (Good news for you - they now have testosterone in a patch form).

And frankly, you don't know jack sh*t about my morals - the actual effect of that strong sex drive...you don't know if I have been with 10 women, 2 women, or 100 women. You don't know if I have ever paid for sex, or how often. And yet, you feel comfortable being judgemental on my state of morals....? Interesting, and very illuminating - about you.

Future Shock

Your error, in my opinion, FS, is that you assume you know yourself. If you stumble into the unconscious you will be in for a big surprise much like discovering your a battery pack for the Matrix.

Noone knows themselves - except people that have spent 20 years in analysis possibly.

But I don't have to know myself to study the EFFECT - all I have to do is look at exhibited behaviour. That is not subject to my inner drives or subconcious - it is what (and whom) I have done.

That behaviour IS subject to interpretation and values judgement of course - how many women is too many for an unmarried 40+ year old to have been with without being a sleaze? Does paying for sex ONCE in your life on a bachelor party drunken evening make you a person of no morals - or low alchohol tolerance? Is sleeping with three women in a night materially worse than sleeping with two? Not that I claim any of the above for myself - they are all just examples - but these are all value judgements, not hard and fast rules.

Future Shock

 

[thebigdude]

It should be legalized, taxed, and regulated, like alcohol or tobacco. But it won't happen.

 

[BoberFett]

Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Of course neocons do not want to give them any rights, but it may mean that when trying to lock someone up for not paying taxes it will turn into a long legal battle.

What does this have to do with "neocons" you silly troll? Have we seen Democrats push for legalization of prositution? I didn't think so, so shut your stupid hole.

 

[Moonbeam]

FS: Noone knows themselves - except people that have spent 20 years in analysis possibly.

M: A possible corollary to this understanding, then, might be that one should not take oneself too seriously or assume the validity of opinions that are just that, opinions. One should be more modest than absolute perhaps.

FS: But I don't have to know myself to study the EFFECT - all I have to do is look at exhibited behaviour. That is not subject to my inner drives or subconcious - it is what (and whom) I have done.
M: I'm sorry but I have no idea what you are saying here. Too dumb, perhaps, to figure it out.

FS: That behaviour IS subject to interpretation and values judgement of course - how many women is too many for an unmarried 40+ year old to have been with without being a sleaze? Does paying for sex ONCE in your life on a bachelor party drunken evening make you a person of no morals - or low alchohol tolerance? Is sleeping with three women in a night materially worse than sleeping with two? Not that I claim any of the above for myself - they are all just examples - but these are all value judgements, not hard and fast rules.

M: I am not interested in making value judgments about these things. I am no different than you. I think two things. The first is that we are all infected with a profound self hate that is deeply hidden. The other is that real sex, the best of sex, is that which pair bonds people in love. Put the two together and whenever or wherever I state this belief there will arise in the minds of those who do not know such sex a resentment and a feeling that I am saying it's not just their sex but their whole being which is inferior and that this fact itself becomes part of the mix of what we don't want to see.

 

[Skyclad1uhm1]

Originally posted by: BoberFett

Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1
Of course neocons do not want to give them any rights, but it may mean that when trying to lock someone up for not paying taxes it will turn into a long legal battle.

What does this have to do with "neocons" you silly troll? Have we seen Democrats push for legalization of prositution? I didn't think so, so shut your stupid hole.

Wasn't Clinton in favor of allowing whores into the White House?