His utter lack for the truth is overshadowed by his own personal political agenda in the Columbine movie that even the mainstream media was quick to point out it was more fiction than fact. He has made very clear he is an opponent to the Bush administration and gun owners in general. So I was wondering about a couple points that maybe the good folks at ATOT can help clear up for me.
How does Michael Moore expect anybody to take his new film, Fahrenheit 911, seriously when he lost all of his creditability with Bowling for Columbine?
How can he even call either of these movies a ?documentary? when they are full of lies and half-truths?
Reference Link for Bowling for Columbine
How does Michael Moore expect anybody to take his new film, Fahrenheit 911, seriously when he lost all of his creditability with Bowling for Columbine?
How can he even call either of these movies a ?documentary? when they are full of lies and half-truths?
Reference Link for Bowling for Columbine