Originally posted by: BoomerD
Not caring about people you don't know or have no connection to is NOT hating them...why can't you people understand that?
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I'm sure some of them said the same thing about what happened to the people of New York city or the Pentagon on 9/11/01.
Human are hard wired to hate each other...
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Not caring about people you don't know or have no connection to is NOT hating them...why can't you people understand that?
Originally posted by: buck
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Not caring about people you don't know or have no connection to is NOT hating them...why can't you people understand that?
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: buck
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Not caring about people you don't know or have no connection to is NOT hating them...why can't you people understand that?
:thumbsup:
:thumbsdown:
You can feel sad for someone without weeping or tearing your hair out. When I look at pictures of crushed five year olds, I am definitely sad. But apparently I'm in the minority.
I guess the human race has failed when there is such a lack of caring for others. The number of social deviants in this thread (who would probably care more if there processor burned out than if a child died) is truly disturbing.
Apparently the OP is already aware he is a bad person for this attitude. I'm just amazed at how many here won't even admit that fact.
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I'm sure some of them said the same thing about what happened to the people of New York city or the Pentagon on 9/11/01.
Human are hard wired to hate each other...
Katrina would be a better comparison IMO.
Originally posted by: meltdown75
it's fine that you don't care, but it is odd that you feel the need to put that out there on the internet.
you're looking for attention, nothing more, nothing less.
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I'm sure some of them said the same thing about what happened to the people of New York city or the Pentagon on 9/11/01.
Human are hard wired to hate each other...
Katrina would be a better comparison IMO.
Funny you should mention that...
Shorter article
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I'm sure some of them said the same thing about what happened to the people of New York city or the Pentagon on 9/11/01.
Human are hard wired to hate each other...
Katrina would be a better comparison IMO.
Funny you should mention that...
Shorter article
Originally posted by: StormRider
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I'm sure some of them said the same thing about what happened to the people of New York city or the Pentagon on 9/11/01.
Human are hard wired to hate each other...
Katrina would be a better comparison IMO.
Funny you should mention that...
Shorter article
Hmmm, that's interesting.
On September 2, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that it will offer $5 million along with emergency supplies, including 1,000 tents, 600 generators, bed sheets, immediately for disaster relief. China also offered to send medical care and rescue workers if they were needed.[5] This aid package consisting of 104 tons of supplies later arrived in Little Rock, Arkansas.[6] A chartered plane carrying the supplies arrived on September 7.[7]
Originally posted by: LongCoolMother
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Feldenak
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I'm sure some of them said the same thing about what happened to the people of New York city or the Pentagon on 9/11/01.
Human are hard wired to hate each other...
Katrina would be a better comparison IMO.
Funny you should mention that...
Shorter article
wow. nice article. :thumbsup: there still are people in the world who really do care for humanity. otherwise there wouldn't be organizations like the red cross. i also heard reports of american volunteers flying into the earthquake areas to help.
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: buck
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Not caring about people you don't know or have no connection to is NOT hating them...why can't you people understand that?
:thumbsup:
:thumbsdown:
You can feel sad for someone without weeping or tearing your hair out. When I look at pictures of crushed five year olds, I am definitely sad. But apparently I'm in the minority.
I guess the human race has failed when there is such a lack of caring for others. The number of social deviants in this thread (who would probably care more if there processor burned out than if a child died) is truly disturbing.
Apparently the OP is already aware he is a bad person for this attitude. I'm just amazed at how many here won't even admit that fact.
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: buck
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Not caring about people you don't know or have no connection to is NOT hating them...why can't you people understand that?
:thumbsup:
:thumbsdown:
You can feel sad for someone without weeping or tearing your hair out. When I look at pictures of crushed five year olds, I am definitely sad. But apparently I'm in the minority.
I guess the human race has failed when there is such a lack of caring for others. The number of social deviants in this thread (who would probably care more if there processor burned out than if a child died) is truly disturbing.
Apparently the OP is already aware he is a bad person for this attitude. I'm just amazed at how many here won't even admit that fact.
So...you had to see some pictures of 7 or 8 dead people to be really wrenched about 10k+ dying? Nice compassionate bravado. You probably just don't enjoy seeing dead people, just like most others.
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: buck
Originally posted by: BoomerD
Not caring about people you don't know or have no connection to is NOT hating them...why can't you people understand that?
:thumbsup:
:thumbsdown:
You can feel sad for someone without weeping or tearing your hair out. When I look at pictures of crushed five year olds, I am definitely sad. But apparently I'm in the minority.
I guess the human race has failed when there is such a lack of caring for others. The number of social deviants in this thread (who would probably care more if there processor burned out than if a child died) is truly disturbing.
Apparently the OP is already aware he is a bad person for this attitude. I'm just amazed at how many here won't even admit that fact.
So...you had to see some pictures of 7 or 8 dead people to be really wrenched about 10k+ dying? Nice compassionate bravado. You probably just don't enjoy seeing dead people, just like most others.
1. I'm a freakin' human being so I was sad when I first heard about it.
2. It is the OP and his cohorts who said even seeing pictures makes them feel nothing.
3. Idiot
4. WTF is "compassionate bravado"?![]()
Originally posted by: BoomerD
WTF are you? A 14 year old emo-kid? That's about how you're coming off.
Most of us have said that we may feel badly for the people who were hurt/killed, as that sort of thing is always a tragedy, but we really don't care about it. People die all the time...one every 6 seconds or so in fact, but we don't get all wrought up about them either.
Face it, very few people in the world care about anything that doesn't affect them and theirs directly. Sure, we can say how terrible this earthquake was, and rant about how the shoddy Chinese building practices must have contributed to the high death count, but in reality, we just don't care. It doesn't impact us.
Originally posted by: dainthomas
Originally posted by: BoomerD
WTF are you? A 14 year old emo-kid? That's about how you're coming off.
Most of us have said that we may feel badly for the people who were hurt/killed, as that sort of thing is always a tragedy, but we really don't care about it. People die all the time...one every 6 seconds or so in fact, but we don't get all wrought up about them either.
Face it, very few people in the world care about anything that doesn't affect them and theirs directly. Sure, we can say how terrible this earthquake was, and rant about how the shoddy Chinese building practices must have contributed to the high death count, but in reality, we just don't care. It doesn't impact us.
Actually the point of this thread was you people feel nothing.
I shouldn't be surprised by your defensive response.
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Myanmar on the other hand... :roll: I heard over NPR this morning that a multinational military force should be dispatched to the country to force aid to that country. If that's on the table, it should be done NOW. The more hours these people are left without aid, the more they will suffer; and more will die. Something/anything needs to be done now.
While indirectly bolstering the junta's resistance to foreign assistance, China is also shielding Burma from pressure to open up. It has led the opposition at the U.N. Security Council to proposals that humanitarian aid be authorized for Burma without the regime's consent, under the U.N. doctrine known as "responsibility to protect." Beijing also resists a milder proposal for a U.N. resolution ordering Burma to accept relief and allow rescue efforts.
Originally posted by: maddogchen
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Myanmar on the other hand... :roll: I heard over NPR this morning that a multinational military force should be dispatched to the country to force aid to that country. If that's on the table, it should be done NOW. The more hours these people are left without aid, the more they will suffer; and more will die. Something/anything needs to be done now.
the suggestion of a multi-national force has already been ruled out by............dun dun dun.....China!
While indirectly bolstering the junta's resistance to foreign assistance, China is also shielding Burma from pressure to open up. It has led the opposition at the U.N. Security Council to proposals that humanitarian aid be authorized for Burma without the regime's consent, under the U.N. doctrine known as "responsibility to protect." Beijing also resists a milder proposal for a U.N. resolution ordering Burma to accept relief and allow rescue efforts.
Text