Do you want to see an AT BF2 server?

[venk]

Originally posted by: Qosis

Originally posted by: RaDragon
We should post our BF2 names, too.

<--- RaDragon

<-- Qosis.

We're so creative!

<--- venk

Fo' Real yo.

 

[The Batt?sai]

i would play bf2 if someone would trade me for it (have quake 4 dvd and call of duty 2
:-D )

 

[DukeN]

I want an AT GF server

 

[etalns]

Bump!

Also, if anyone who plays a lot of BF2 (and knows the multiplayer aspe t well) can contact me on AIM (my aim is Qosis55) I'll be willing to give them admin access if they are helpful.

 

[gabemcg]

1) the more the merrier
2)yes
3)more so than non-ranked
4)City maps, larger sizes (lotsa vehicles)
5)?
6)not that I can think of...

 

[etalns]

Originally posted by: gabemcg
1) the more the merrier
2)yes
3)more so than non-ranked
4)City maps, larger sizes (lotsa vehicles)
5)?
6)not that I can think of...

At this point I am wondering whether I Should og for 16 or 32.

I think it will be dependant on what maps are played on the server.

Any help on what maps I should use?

 

[gabemcg]

Strike at Karkland is a fav
Wake Island 2006
umm...

 

[A5]

Originally posted by: Qosis

Originally posted by: gabemcg
1) the more the merrier
2)yes
3)more so than non-ranked
4)City maps, larger sizes (lotsa vehicles)
5)?
6)not that I can think of...

At this point I am wondering whether I Should og for 16 or 32.

I think it will be dependant on what maps are played on the server.

Any help on what maps I should use?

I'd go for 32.

Maps:
The standard rotation is good - I personally dislike Songhua Stalemate, but everything else is pretty good.

<-- a5ehren

 

[JRich]

32 player.

<---DarthDubbya


edit: Wake Island is the shizzle

 

[dartworth]

I have a BF2 server running if anyone wants to try it out.


69.57.191.10 port 16567


It is a fairly fast server too

 

[dartworth]

Originally posted by: dartworth
I have a BF2 server running if anyone wants to try it out.


69.57.191.10 port 16567


It is a fairly fast server too

Server is up and running.

I'm getting a great ping of 34ms

 

[Goosemaster]

Originally posted by: dartworth

Originally posted by: dartworth
I have a BF2 server running if anyone wants to try it out.


69.57.191.10 port 16567


It is a fairly fast server too

Server is up and running.

I'm getting a great ping of 34ms

I'll join you people later (just got home from work..eating and stuff)

 

[etalns]

Bump!

Just wanted to let everyone know I'm in the process of having the server set up.

 

[flyboy84]

<---Resonant Cowboy

Ranked is a must, and I'd say at least 32 players.

 

[Oakenfold]

All the map packs are a great imo.
16 players isn't enough, if this community can support 32-64 players super.
Non Ranked is actually how I play since I do most of my gaming over @ TG.
It keeps stat padding and quite a few of the kiddies away.
You could make it a requirement for people to join squads, make it a rule to listen to their sl, make it a rule for sl's to listen to their CO.
If you like teamwork that is.

 

[Malak]

32 player minimum. Is this special forces or just standard BF2? Special forces is a great expansion, added a lot, would be silly not to do it.

 

[Oakenfold]

Originally posted by: Malak
32 player minimum. Is this special forces or just standard BF2? Special forces is a great expansion, added a lot, would be silly not to do it.

Might be good to add that to the poll, I'd be interested to see how many play SF here.
I for one don't but that's because where I play it doesn't seem to be favored.

 

[Malak]

Originally posted by: Oakenfold

Originally posted by: Malak
32 player minimum. Is this special forces or just standard BF2? Special forces is a great expansion, added a lot, would be silly not to do it.

Might be good to add that to the poll, I'd be interested to see how many play SF here.
I for one don't but that's because where I play it doesn't seem to be favored.

You really should. It added some neat maps and some cool new toys. Not to mention 3 new armies complete with even some new weapons and unlocks. I like some of the new weapons a lot. Plus when I got the expansion it gave me like 4 more unlocks!

 

[LiquidImpulse]

Unranked servers are usually empty, so it'd be best to go ranked . Also, best maps IMO are Strike at Karkand,Mashtuur City,Dalian Plant,Sharqi Peninsula, and Wake 2007

oh yes, and BF2 name --------------> liquid_impulse
go figure.

As for SF, I really dont think you should go that way. EA's got enuf bugs and glitches under its belt with BF2 and they decide to release SF?!? big no no. I suggest only going for a SF server when all the bugs and glitches have been sorted out, As well as a larger majority of people playing it. I for one, am sticking to BF2 for now.

 

[dguy6789]

I would prefer:

Ranked
64 Players
All Maps
No Time limit

I do not have SF at the moment, but will likely purchase it in the relatively near future.

 

[psihog]

I like Spec Ops for the extra weapons, but still prefer to play original BF2 city maps. Strike, Mashur..
And will AT server be bunny hopper friendly? (people still complain after the patch..)

 

[dguy6789]

Pending Patch 1.21>Patch 1.2>*

 

[Nextman916]

Originally posted by: Qosis
Ping this IP also, it's DeviousTraps. He's another option for hosting.

72.21.34.26

51ms
64.27.3.134
75ms

I live on the east coast, Florida to be exact.

 

[xtknight]

Thanks for the server! Here's my ping:

Pinging 64.27.3.134 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.27.3.134: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.27.3.134: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.27.3.134: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=47
Reply from 64.27.3.134: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=47

Pinging 72.21.34.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.21.34.26: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=46
Reply from 72.21.34.26: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=46
Reply from 72.21.34.26: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=46
Reply from 72.21.34.26: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=46

 

[imported_Crusader]

Ping from Chicago area:

Pinging 72.21.34.26 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.21.34.26: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.21.34.26: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.21.34.26: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=49
Reply from 72.21.34.26: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 72.21.34.26:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 44ms, Maximum = 64ms, Average = 51ms

Pinging 64.27.3.134 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.27.3.134: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=51
Reply from 64.27.3.134: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=51
Reply from 64.27.3.134: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=51
Reply from 64.27.3.134: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 64.27.3.134:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 77ms, Maximum = 81ms, Average = 79ms


Vote for no SF support. Most of us dont have it.. and I dont plan on getting it.
I dont care what version you use, latest version is fine.

32 or 64player would be optimal. Dont care about the rest. I'm a really crappy player so if the server is created be nice to me. I do enjoy participating though.