• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Do you think this guy will ever be invited back to Fox News?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
HomerJS said:
Since the intelligence was in error why don't those spinless Republicans pick a fight with Gen. Patraeus or James Clapper the people who signed off on the talking points???????
Click to expand...

Last I checked Patraeus conveniently quit

And while they signed off on said talking points they didn't push them in the media and shovel that shit to the American people.

Its nice that people here just want to wash it away because the messiah's team was running with it though, the irony is that the same crowd bitches about fox
 
It is lovely seeing both the radio and TV arms of the Radical Republican Party getting their collective Asses kicked :thumbsup:
 
dmcowen674 said:
It is lovely seeing both the radio and TV arms of the Radical Republican Party getting their collective Asses kicked :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

This guy not only diverted to Iraq when asked about Benghazi, he also doesn't even get his "facts" straight about contractors killed in Iraq. Here is a list of the contractors killed in Iraq and what they did.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_private_contractor_deaths_in_Iraq

This is either a ratard for going on TV without even doing 20 seconds or research, or he flat out lied.
 
Ausm said:
But you watch Fox so where does that leave you? LMFAO....
Click to expand...

I don't think I can bring myself down far enough to debate on your level. Sit back and watch as the big kids actually present facts and not the rantings of a 3rd grader.
 
What facts? The fact is nobody cared about the hundreds of contractors that died in Iraq under the orders of your leaders but a few guys die in a gunfight under the Antichrist NegrObama and you racist dipshits never let it go. Go make another youtube video about Obama being named in the Bible and the End Times being upon us FFS.
 
Pr0d1gy said:
What facts? The fact is nobody cared about the hundreds of contractors that died in Iraq under the orders of your leaders but a few guys die in a gunfight under the Antichrist NegrObama and you racist dipshits never let it go. Go make another youtube video about Obama being named in the Bible and the End Times being upon us FFS.
Click to expand...

Don't get mad, just put them on your ignore list. That way you only have to be presented with the facts that you agree with.
 
bozack said:
Last I checked Patraeus conveniently quit

And while they signed off on said talking points they didn't push them in the media and shovel that shit to the American people.

Its nice that people here just want to wash it away because the messiah's team was running with it though, the irony is that the same crowd bitches about fox
Click to expand...

So basically you want to shoot the person who delivered the message not the one who created it. Makes all the sense in the world since a UN ambassador is in a position to vet intelligence. So why are you guys afraid of James Clapper? Too tough to pick on? Why are you guys afraid of Patraeus? He can be called back to congress at anytime even though he quit. Afraid of him too?

Again I ask where is the outrage for the actual killings? Oh yeah that wouldn't fit people's agenda.
 
Matt1970 said:
Don't get mad, just put them on your ignore list. That way you only have to be presented with the facts that you agree with.
Click to expand...

Yeah or I could completely ignore the facts laid out in front of me, just like you. How clever...pfft
 
Matt1970 said:
I don't think I can bring myself down far enough to debate on your level. Sit back and watch as the big kids actually present facts and not the rantings of a 3rd grader.
Click to expand...

lmao That's really rich coming from the likes of your and your other Rethuglicant brethren on this forum.
 
Matt1970 said:
This guy not only diverted to Iraq when asked about Benghazi, he also doesn't even get his "facts" straight about contractors killed in Iraq. Here is a list of the contractors killed in Iraq and what they did.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_private_contractor_deaths_in_Iraq

This is either a ratard for going on TV without even doing 20 seconds or research, or he flat out lied.
Click to expand...

Matt, here is his bio.

Thomas E. Ricks covered the U.S. military for the Washington Post from 2000 through 2008. Until the end of 1999 he had the same beat at the Wall Street Journal, where he was a reporter for 17 years.
He reported on U.S. military activities in Somalia, Haiti, Korea, Bosnia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Kuwait, Turkey, Afghanistan, and Iraq. He was part of a Wall Street Journal team that won the Pulitzer Prize for national reporting in 2000 for a series of articles on how the U.S. military might change to meet the new demands of the 21st century
Click to expand...

But, you're arguing that your 10 seconds of googling is superior to his reporting. Typical of your brain dead posts.
 
emperus said:
Matt, here is his bio.



But, you're arguing that your 10 seconds of googling is superior to his reporting. Typical of your brain dead posts.
Click to expand...

Yup looks like he is a complete hack ...hence the Faux noise freak out! :biggrin::whiste:
 
emperus said:
Matt, here is his bio.



But, you're arguing that your 10 seconds of googling is superior to his reporting. Typical of your brain dead posts.
Click to expand...

Sorry he didn't work for Fox News, the only credible reporting gig on a resume to him.
 
emperus said:
Matt, here is his bio.



But, you're arguing that your 10 seconds of googling is superior to his reporting. Typical of your brain dead posts.
Click to expand...

You would think someone like that would be able to find the data he claims doesn't exists. Well, the braindead guy found it. It took me 10 seconds on Google.
 
Pr0d1gy said:
Yeah or I could completely ignore the facts laid out in front of me, just like you. How clever...pfft
Click to expand...
Lets assume that people did wrongly ignore contractor deaths in Iraq. Should we then ignore every death that may have been the result of shitty leadership? Does it give us carte blanche to ignore every single possible failure where Americans die in the future?
 
buckshot24 said:
Lets assume that people did wrongly ignore contractor deaths in Iraq. Should we then ignore every death that may have been the result of shitty leadership? Does it give us carte blanche to ignore every single possible failure where Americans die in the future?
Click to expand...

Are you referring to the Rethuglicants who cut the funding for embassy security or President Obama for not personally sitting on the wire?
 
Matt1970 said:
You would think someone like that would be able to find the data he claims doesn't exists. Well, the braindead guy found it. It took me 10 seconds on Google.
Click to expand...

This is what he said. "No, Nobody does, because nobody cared. We know that several hundred died but there has never been an official count done."

You referenced a list from Wiki. If you look at the references in the list. You will notice two things. 1.) there is no Official US document with the listed names 2.) If you actually go to the site in the first citation which accounts for the names, this is what you will find.

Iraq Coalition Casualties: Contractors - A Partial List


It is understood that the above lists is incomplete.
Please contact us if you have sourced information that would help to fill in blanks.
Click to expand...

So, who would have thought that 10 seconds of research derived from googling Wikipedia might not have been totally accurate?
 
Last edited:
Matt1970 said:
LOL, you guys are pathetic. This guys spins, diverts to Iraq and gives nothing but opinion and you guys gobble it up as truth.
Click to expand...

Need a mirror?
buckshot24 said:
Was the ambassador killed in Iraq?
Click to expand...

The guest's point was that for Fox they'll hype American deaths as long as it helps Republicans... hyping the contractor deaths would not have accomplished that goal.

Whether or not you agree with the guest is of course up to you.
 
blankslate said:
The guest's point was that for Fox they'll hype American deaths as long as it helps Republicans... hyping the contractor deaths would not have accomplished that goal.

Whether or not you agree with the guest is of course up to you.
Click to expand...
Fine and dandy but the cases aren't comparable as an ambassador was killed in this one. This should get more attention.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top