Originally posted by: Zap Brannigan
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Zap Brannigan
"Many that live deserve death. Some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them, Frodo? Do not be too eager to deal out death and judgment. Even the very wise cannot see all ends."
-Gandalf
And yet Gandalf himself took quite a bit of life. I think you missed the point of that quote. I would not say that 25 years of appeals was "eager," or that Tookie was going to be the instrument to destroy the One Ring.
Fixed your typo too.
Gandalf fought in self defense. He was'nt all reigning down death sentences left and right to anyone. It's not his fault orcs kept rushinhg to impaling themselves on his sword. lol
Golem was a murderer too and alive longer than 25 years after his crimes too. Golem even tried to kill Gandalfs good friend Bilbo and niether Bilbo nor Gandalf sentenced Golem to death by hanging or what not.
Face it, the death penalty is not only cruel and unusual, it's ****** retarded. All in favor of eye for an eye are blind in more than one way.
In a way, capital punishment is self-defense in the same fashion you describe. We are protecting ourselves from and removing ourselves of a proven threat that has murdered innocent people.
It's not our fault that Tookie choose to murder innocent people. It's not raining (fixed your spelling) down death sentences left and right. That shows extreme disrespect for our laws and our democratic process. He received a fair and impartial trial and was found guilty by a jury based upon evidence providing proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Beyond that, he got 25 years of appeals.
As to "cruel and unusual," that is just ignorant. I already addressed this abuse of the 8th Amendment earlier in this thread. At the time of the writing of the Constitution, there were no prisons in the modern sense, and the 2 principal forms of punishment were either corporal (whipping or stockade) or capital (primarily hanging). If hanging was not "cruel and unusual" to the people who actually wrote that phrase in the Constitution, how can it be now?
I have an idea: let's avoid this whole eye-for-an-eye thing and not punish criminals at all. Just let 'em run wild. Because no matter what punishment we mete out, it's all still eye-for-an-eye, is it not? Oh yeah, that'll work...
Retard... :roll: