Do You Think NVIDIA WIll Release a GTX 750 Ti Boost?

[NewYorksFinest]

There was the GTX 650 Ti Boost which elevated itself above the disappointing GTX 650 Ti. Will a GTX 750 Ti Boost be released in 2014-2015?

 

[Insert_Nickname]

The 750TI already "boosts". Sorry couldn't resist... :biggrin:

I suppose they could release a higher-clocked version with an 800-series prefix. Nobody really knows anything about Nvidias Maxwell plans...

 

[lehtv]

Five bucks says they won't.

 

[toyota]

lol the 750 ti is already a "boost" card as already mentioned.

 

[Rezist]

650Ti boost though was a 660 core I believe so unless they make a larger maxwell 28nm core it wouldn't really be comparable.

 

[toyota]

650Ti boost though was a 660 core I believe so unless they make a larger maxwell 28nm core it wouldn't really be comparable.

no as the 660, 650 ti and 650 ti boost were ALL GK106 anyway. they called it the boost because the regular 650 ti had a fixed clock. we have the whole internet in front of us so simply look at reviews.

 

[el etro]

So early?? Probably no.

GTX 750//GTX 750 TI was a test Maxwell card. True Maxwell will come at 20nm silicon.

 

[Cloudfire777]

When they feel threatened by AMD.
Meaning when AMD is out with a more efficient architecture than GCN 1.0(1.1).

AMD offer better performance/$ with R9 265, but as long as Nvidia stay ahead in performance/watt, they have no need to do anything.
But this doesnt mean a GTX 750 Ti Boost will even happen. The 750Ti goes up to 1150MHz through GPU Boost 2.0, but overclocking have shown it can do much more than that, so theoretically a GTX 750 Ti Boost is plausible in the future.
But chances are that you would want to buy a 20nm Maxwell low end card instead when that arrives.

 

[toyota]

there will be NO 750 ti boost. AGAIN there was a 650 ti boost because the regular 650 ti did NOT have a boost clock.

 

[Cloudfire777]

Well call it whatever you want, I think OP meant a higher clocked GM107. Looking at Nvidia`s history of rebranding the crap out of any chip, the odds are that they might just release a GM107 that goes higher than 1150MHz.

Depends what their plan with 20nm is.

 

[Madpacket]

I love my 750 TI for power efficient reasons and would be happy if they could pack a few more SMX's into a 20nm refresh. These cards are great for 1080P HTPC's.

 

[TrulyUncouth]

there will be NO 750 ti boost. AGAIN there was a 650 ti boost because the regular 650 ti did NOT have a boost clock.

The guys is asking a simple question, just yelling no at him again and again is not conducive to conversation. He is asking if its reasonable that a slightly faster version of the 750ti might be in the cards. Its perfectly reasonable that Nvidia could reuse the boost name and come up with a beefier card or use the name and simply give the 750ti higher boost clocks.

As much as you wish it were so, you are not capable of saying for certain that they won't- so quit acting as if you know.

 

[toyota]

The guys is asking a simple question, just yelling no at him again and again is not conducive to conversation. He is asking if its reasonable that a slightly faster version of the 750ti might be in the cards. Its perfectly reasonable that Nvidia could reuse the boost name and come up with a beefier card or use the name and simply give the 750ti higher boost clocks.

As much as you wish it were so, you are not capable of saying for certain that they won't- so quit acting as if you know.

perhaps pay more attention as I am not directly replying to the OP with that comment. it is not reasonable at all to make a faster 750 ti card and call it "boost". obviously saying why yet again will not do any good if you have not figured it out by now.

 

[el etro]

650Ti boost is made by a cut-down GTX660 chip(it have a different core count than GTX 650Ti).

 

[toyota]

650Ti boost is made by a cut-down GTX660 chip(it have a different core count than GTX 650Ti).

please take a few seconds to actually look up things as that is not true. as I have already said, BOTH the 650 ti and 650 ti boost are GK106 which is the 660 chip. they were also both 768 cores. the difference was that the 650 ti boost had 24 rops and the 192 bit bus and had boost clock. the 650 ti was 128 bit and had 16 rops and NO boost clock. again it takes only few second to look this stuff up.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6838/nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-boost-review-

 

[SPBHM]

the 650 Ti boost main thing was the additional memory bandwidth/ROPs I think,
and obliviously the boost clock, both had the same GPU, but the 650 Ti had so many parts disabled that it was easy to create a new model between the 650 Ti and the full GPU (660)

but the 650 Ti boost as far as I can remember was a reaction to the 7790,

so I can see nvidia releasing a new product, faster than the 750 Ti around the same price range if needed, but the 750 Ti GPU is close to the limit, so they would need to use a difference GPU, perhaps for now they could release a 750 Ti boost using a full GK106, or call it 760 SE or something, but I don't see it happening although it would make sense to try and beat the R7 265/270 non X, but it wouldn't have the Maxwell architecture efficiency... so I think we are only going to start seeing new interesting things with the 800 series.

 

[TrulyUncouth]

perhaps pay more attention as I am not directly replying to the OP with that comment. it is not reasonable at all to make a faster 750 ti card and call it "boost". obviously saying why yet again will not do any good if you have not figured it out by now.

You are not the arbiter of what is true. Its perfectly reasonable they could reuse the boost name and do what I and others have suggested. Either give it higher clocks with the same chip or release a chip with more ROPs/cores/etc. Its perfectly reasonable to think they might reuse the name.

If you would like to give the "obvious" reasons it absolutely 100% CANNOT be used ever again for a chip that already has boost, I'd love to hear it, oh wise one.

Here's a link to merriam webster just in case you are incapable of figuring out the definition on your own. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/boost See how boost isn't simply defined as "Adding a temporary overclock feature to a graphics card"? But surely Nvidia will never reuse the name ever again... right.

 

[toyota]

You are not the arbiter of what is true. Its perfectly reasonable they could reuse the boost name and do what I and others have suggested. Either give it higher clocks with the same chip or release a chip with more ROPs/cores/etc. Its perfectly reasonable to think they might reuse the name.

If you would like to give the "obvious" reasons it absolutely 100% CANNOT be used ever again for a chip that already has boost, I'd love to hear it, oh wise one.

Here's a link to merriam webster just in case you are incapable of figuring out the definition on your own. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/boost See how boost isn't simply defined as "Adding a temporary overclock feature to a graphics card"? But surely Nvidia will never reuse the name ever again... right.

so in other words you just want to argue for the sake of arguing. Anyone with the least bit of knowledge knows darn well they are not going to call a card that already has boost a boost card from just raising the clocks.

 

[el etro]

please take a few seconds to actually look up things as that is not true. as I have already said, BOTH the 650 ti and 650 ti boost are GK106 which is the 660 chip. they werhttp://forums.anandtech.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=36451785e also both 768 cores. the difference was that the 650 ti boost had 24 rops and the 192 bit bus and had boost clock. the 650 ti was 128 bit and had 16 rops and NO boost clock. again it takes only few second to look this stuff up.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6838/nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-boost-review-

Then 650Ti and 650TiB are not the same chip with different clocks. GTX660 and GTX 650TiB differs only on core count.

 

[toyota]

Then 650Ti and 650TiB are not the same chip with different clocks. GTX660 and GTX 650TiB differs only on core count.

why do you keep saying that when I even provided a link showing you that you are mistaken?

the 650ti and 650ti boost are BOTH on gk106 which is what the 660 uses so please stop saying they are not. you must be thinking about the plain 650.

 

[TrulyUncouth]

so in other words you just want to argue for the sake of arguing. Anyone with the least bit of knowledge knows darn well they are not going to call a card that already has boost a boost card from just raising the clocks.

Yep, because it makes no sense to use a name that was put on probably one of their most purchased cards from the past era... I can only imagine you have a job in marketing with your obviously great grasp of what makes sense

Next thing you are gonna tell me there is no Titanium in any of the Ti cards, genius.

 

[toyota]

Yep, because it makes no sense to use a name that was put on probably one of their most purchased cards from the past era... I can only imagine you have a job in marketing with your obviously great grasp of what makes sense

Next thing you are gonna tell me there is no Titanium in any of the Ti cards, genius.

you are the one that cant seem to grasp the very reason it would not be called boost. THE CARD ALREADY HAS BOOST. the 650 ti did not so when they added the boost clock they called it boost.

 

[el etro]

why do you keep saying that when I even provided a link showing you that you are mistaken?

When i say same chip, i say same core count, TMUs, ROPs... like HD 7850 and R7 265.

 

[SlickR12345]

Absolutely not, but you can get an AMD R7 265 for the same price now that is 15%-20% percent faster than the GTX 750 TI.

So just get a $150 R7 265 and be happy with 15%-20% performance over the 750TI or for about $30 cheaper you could go for the R7 260x and have 10% slower card than the 750TI for $30 less.

 

[el etro]

the 650ti and 650ti boost are BOTH on gk106 which is what the 660 uses so please stop saying they are not. you must be thinking about the plain 650.

650Ti -> Same core count -> 650TiB -> Only different core count -> GTX 660 (960 vs 768 cores but all the other parts of the chip is activated).