yes of course I know that if you look at my comments here. you kept saying the 650 ti and 650 ti boost were not the same chip but they are. you were misusing the word chip which you have already explained in post 23. not sure why you waited an hour to reply to the other part of my post as all of that was there when you first replied.
lol yes I said I understood what you mean now.Ok. All of them are GK106, i know this.
You didn't understood my logic. Go two mine posts back to understood.
you are the one that cant seem to grasp the very reason it would not be called boost. THE CARD ALREADY HAS BOOST. the 650 ti did not so when they added the boost clock they called it boost.
your examples dont help your argument one single bit. calling a card that already has boost, a boost card just because they raise clocks makes no sense at all. even the few people arguing this know there will not actually be a 750 ti boost.
yes I know and already mentioned that. The point was that the card was called boost because it had a boost clock where as the regular 650 Ti did not.
...better than no new low-voltage cards AT ALL... plus SLI tends to work quite well most of the time.Why? As usual with SLI it would properly be less efficient then just having a bigger Maxwell core. Add the usual panoply of SLI driver issues, and I think I'll pass...
by that logic they could call it any stupid name you can pull out of your butt. if you look at this with any common sense and logic though then you know darn well they are not going to call it a boost card if they simply raise the clockspeeds. the only card they call boost was a card they actually added boost to so imagine that. but feel free to argue all you want no matter how unrealistic and ridiculous it is that it will ever happen.
is this really what you are going with? again with that logic it could be called ANYTHING. stop trying to argue for the sake of arguing and be realistic.
by that logic they could call it any stupid name you can pull out of your butt. if you look at this with any common sense and logic though then you know darn well they are not going to call it a boost card if they simply raise the clockspeeds. the only card they call boost was a card they actually added boost to so imagine that. but feel free to argue all you want no matter how unrealistic and ridiculous it is that it will ever happen.
do you truly have nothing better to do then to come with ridiculous ways of arguing such a silly topic?So if they already added Ti to indicate it is faster than regular 750... yet they don't want to go to 755 or 760 for the next fastest card what do you think they will call it? If you are the marketing guy and your boss comes to you with those requirements you honestly think there is no chance they would look back at the previous gen and think Boost could work?
Do you really not see that being a possibility? If I see a 750Ti and a 750Ti Boost Edition for sale I immediately know boost is faster... isn't that the entire point of GPU naming schemes?
Facebook
Twitter