I know he wasn't, but I was wondering how anyone could think he was responsible given how soft he was (Bin Laden preached non-violence and he was a pacifist; some quotes attributed to him are at odds with earlier quotes from him), given the interviews he gave (denied it three times before they murdered his ass), and given how much they apparently drugged Bush plus Bush's statements.
Bush inadvertently signed off on it (he didn't make it to NY until that evening, the attacks happened that morning; he had to have been drugged to be that calm when reading to the kids in FL that morning) for sure just like Clinton inadvertently signed off on the OKC bombings. Each piece of legislation is extremely long and deals with multiple subjects.
There was also plenty of foreknowledge held by agents of the U.S. gov.
The two terror attacks happened because Bush and Clinton were so incompetent. The fact that most executives will be more like Bush and Clinton while they're surrounded by very competent demons (Bush had Cheney, Clinton had Albright and Gore) who know exactly how to manipulate the sword is not good for civil society. Obama, OTOH, is always in his right mind, has high self control, and above average intelligence so he knows exactly what he's doing. The problem is that Obama is a statist.
All of that said, the Chief Executive will usually represent the common man because they'll have mediocre IQ and low self control like most men do. Until the central executive power is abolished and replaced with nothing, there will be no civilization.
Bush inadvertently signed off on it (he didn't make it to NY until that evening, the attacks happened that morning; he had to have been drugged to be that calm when reading to the kids in FL that morning) for sure just like Clinton inadvertently signed off on the OKC bombings. Each piece of legislation is extremely long and deals with multiple subjects.
There was also plenty of foreknowledge held by agents of the U.S. gov.
The two terror attacks happened because Bush and Clinton were so incompetent. The fact that most executives will be more like Bush and Clinton while they're surrounded by very competent demons (Bush had Cheney, Clinton had Albright and Gore) who know exactly how to manipulate the sword is not good for civil society. Obama, OTOH, is always in his right mind, has high self control, and above average intelligence so he knows exactly what he's doing. The problem is that Obama is a statist.
All of that said, the Chief Executive will usually represent the common man because they'll have mediocre IQ and low self control like most men do. Until the central executive power is abolished and replaced with nothing, there will be no civilization.
Facebook
Twitter