Do you support clinically depressed owning firearms?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Depressed owning firearms

  • Yes across the board, depression and firearms is okay.

  • Civilians should not have access, police should.

  • No across the board, depression is dangerous with firearms

  • Police should not have access, and civilians should


Results are only viewable after voting.

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,403
32,896
136
I wonder if the OP would post something about blacks and firearms. The ignorance of the general public regarding health issues is staggering and about as damning as racist attitudes
from a century ago.

Yes, it's ok for people with depression to own firearms.

Clinical depression is an abnormailty/sickness. Odd you equate that with being black.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
To be honest depression is greatly over diagnosed. In America we have a bad habit of trying to throw medication at anything and everything.

Now roughly half of you want to take away constitutionally protected rights from people who where prescribed medication for depression.

That is alarming.
That is a good point.

EDIT: We test drugs pretty thoroughly, and I'd bet that the majority of depression medications do not cause psychosis and/or violence. For those associated with bouts of psychosis, it's going to be very difficult to accurately determine if the drug actually causes psychosis in some people for some as yet unknown reason, or if the psychosis is merely not stopped by the drug because the initial diagnosis of depression was incorrect and the doctors were merely throwing something against the wall to see if it would stick. If however a drug has a significant correlation with psychosis, violence or rage, it's appropriate to not allow someone on that drug to possess firearms.
 
Last edited:

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
21,063
16,298
136
Surely if you had a rule saying that if someone has <insert vague/broad term here about someone's mental capacity> then they can't have a firearm, people are even less inclined to seek medical attention because they fear they might be disqualified from owning a firearm?
 

Pr0d1gy

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2005
7,774
0
76
I support any non-felon owning a firearm of any type. If you can manage to stay out of trouble in a country where literally almost everything is illegal, you can certainly safely handle a gun.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Clinical depression is an abnormailty/sickness. Odd you equate that with being black.

It's not odd that you miss the point. I voted that this shouldn't be a disqualification. How about you? BTW see the wheelchair post.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
That is a good point.

EDIT: We test drugs pretty thoroughly, and I'd bet that the majority of depression medications do not cause psychosis and/or violence. For those associated with bouts of psychosis, it's going to be very difficult to accurately determine if the drug actually causes psychosis in some people for some as yet unknown reason, or if the psychosis is merely not stopped by the drug because the initial diagnosis of depression was incorrect and the doctors were merely throwing something against the wall to see if it would stick. If however a drug has a significant correlation with psychosis, violence or rage, it's appropriate to not allow someone on that drug to possess firearms.

There needs to be a scientific basis for an exclusion. Obviously ignorance is the preferred mode for some.